TSTP Solution File: NUM427+3 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUM427+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:32:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.24s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   14 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   27 (  12   ~;   9   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    8 (   0 sgn   3   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(m__,conjecture,
    ( ? [X1] :
        ( aInteger0(X1)
        & sdtasdt0(xq,X1) = sdtpldt0(xb,smndt0(xa)) )
    | aDivisorOf0(xq,sdtpldt0(xb,smndt0(xa)))
    | sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xb,xa,xq) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__) ).

fof(m__767,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xq,smndt0(xn)) = sdtpldt0(xb,smndt0(xa)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__767) ).

fof(mIntNeg,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aInteger0(X1)
     => aInteger0(smndt0(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',mIntNeg) ).

fof(m__747,hypothesis,
    ( aInteger0(xn)
    & sdtasdt0(xq,xn) = sdtpldt0(xa,smndt0(xb)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',m__747) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ? [X1] :
          ( aInteger0(X1)
          & sdtasdt0(xq,X1) = sdtpldt0(xb,smndt0(xa)) )
      | aDivisorOf0(xq,sdtpldt0(xb,smndt0(xa)))
      | sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xb,xa,xq) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[m__]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( ~ aInteger0(X2)
        | sdtasdt0(xq,X2) != sdtpldt0(xb,smndt0(xa)) )
      & ~ aDivisorOf0(xq,sdtpldt0(xb,smndt0(xa)))
      & ~ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xb,xa,xq) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(xq,X1) != sdtpldt0(xb,smndt0(xa))
    | ~ aInteger0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,hypothesis,
    sdtasdt0(xq,smndt0(xn)) = sdtpldt0(xb,smndt0(xa)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__767]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( sdtasdt0(xq,X1) != sdtasdt0(xq,smndt0(xn))
    | ~ aInteger0(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ aInteger0(X2)
      | aInteger0(smndt0(X2)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mIntNeg])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aInteger0(smndt0(xn)),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( aInteger0(smndt0(X1))
    | ~ aInteger0(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    aInteger0(xn),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[m__747]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : NUM427+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 12:20:14 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.24/1.41  
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 14
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 7
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 7
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 7
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 4
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 0.24/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 0.24/1.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 25
% 0.24/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
% 0.24/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 40
% 0.24/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
% 0.24/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 39
% 0.24/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 45
% 0.24/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.24/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 44
% 0.24/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.24/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 5
% 0.24/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 120
% 0.24/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 113
% 0.24/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 117
% 0.24/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 39
% 0.24/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 10
% 0.24/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.24/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 25
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 102
% 0.24/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 403
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 5
% 0.24/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 160
% 0.24/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 83
% 0.24/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 28
% 0.24/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 4
% 0.24/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 4
% 0.24/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.24/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3993
% 0.24/1.42  
% 0.24/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42  # User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.24/1.42  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.24/1.42  # Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.24/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 3060 pages
% 0.24/23.41  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.24/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------