TSTP Solution File: NUM423+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NUM423+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:51:37 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 13.74s 4.64s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 13.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   18
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  11 unt;  11 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   65 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   67 (  26   ~;  25   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   13 (   7   >;   6   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (;  16   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0 > aDivisorOf0 > aInteger0 > sdtpldt0 > sdtasdt0 > #nlpp > smndt0 > xq > xa > sz10 > sz00 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(aInteger0,type,
    aInteger0: $i > $o ).

tff(xq,type,
    xq: $i ).

tff(sdtasdt0,type,
    sdtasdt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(xa,type,
    xa: $i ).

tff(sz10,type,
    sz10: $i ).

tff(sz00,type,
    sz00: $i ).

tff(sdtpldt0,type,
    sdtpldt0: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(smndt0,type,
    smndt0: $i > $i ).

tff(aDivisorOf0,type,
    aDivisorOf0: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0,type,
    sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_159,hypothesis,
    ( aInteger0(xa)
    & aInteger0(xq)
    & ( xq != sz00 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__671) ).

tff(f_30,axiom,
    aInteger0(sz00),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mIntZero) ).

tff(f_109,axiom,
    ! [W0] :
      ( aInteger0(W0)
     => ( ( sdtasdt0(W0,sz00) = sz00 )
        & ( sz00 = sdtasdt0(sz00,W0) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mMulZero) ).

tff(f_140,definition,
    ! [W0] :
      ( aInteger0(W0)
     => ! [W1] :
          ( aDivisorOf0(W1,W0)
        <=> ( aInteger0(W1)
            & ( W1 != sz00 )
            & ? [W2] :
                ( aInteger0(W2)
                & ( sdtasdt0(W1,W2) = W0 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mDivisor) ).

tff(f_73,axiom,
    ! [W0] :
      ( aInteger0(W0)
     => ( ( sdtpldt0(W0,smndt0(W0)) = sz00 )
        & ( sz00 = sdtpldt0(smndt0(W0),W0) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mAddNeg) ).

tff(f_153,definition,
    ! [W0,W1,W2] :
      ( ( aInteger0(W0)
        & aInteger0(W1)
        & aInteger0(W2)
        & ( W2 != sz00 ) )
     => ( sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(W0,W1,W2)
      <=> aDivisorOf0(W2,sdtpldt0(W0,smndt0(W1))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mEquMod) ).

tff(f_161,negated_conjecture,
    ~ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xa,xq),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',m__) ).

tff(c_62,plain,
    xq != sz00,
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_159]) ).

tff(c_66,plain,
    aInteger0(xa),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_159]) ).

tff(c_64,plain,
    aInteger0(xq),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_159]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    aInteger0(sz00),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_30]) ).

tff(c_71,plain,
    ! [W0_42] :
      ( ( sdtasdt0(W0_42,sz00) = sz00 )
      | ~ aInteger0(W0_42) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_109]) ).

tff(c_88,plain,
    sdtasdt0(xq,sz00) = sz00,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_71]) ).

tff(c_1231,plain,
    ! [W1_78,W2_79] :
      ( aDivisorOf0(W1_78,sdtasdt0(W1_78,W2_79))
      | ~ aInteger0(W2_79)
      | ( sz00 = W1_78 )
      | ~ aInteger0(W1_78)
      | ~ aInteger0(sdtasdt0(W1_78,W2_79)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_140]) ).

tff(c_1304,plain,
    ( aDivisorOf0(xq,sz00)
    | ~ aInteger0(sz00)
    | ( xq = sz00 )
    | ~ aInteger0(xq)
    | ~ aInteger0(sdtasdt0(xq,sz00)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_88,c_1231]) ).

tff(c_1356,plain,
    ( aDivisorOf0(xq,sz00)
    | ( xq = sz00 ) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_88,c_64,c_4,c_1304]) ).

tff(c_1357,plain,
    aDivisorOf0(xq,sz00),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_1356]) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    ! [W0_13] :
      ( ( sdtpldt0(W0_13,smndt0(W0_13)) = sz00 )
      | ~ aInteger0(W0_13) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_73]) ).

tff(c_1697,plain,
    ! [W0_86,W1_87,W2_88] :
      ( sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(W0_86,W1_87,W2_88)
      | ~ aDivisorOf0(W2_88,sdtpldt0(W0_86,smndt0(W1_87)))
      | ( sz00 = W2_88 )
      | ~ aInteger0(W2_88)
      | ~ aInteger0(W1_87)
      | ~ aInteger0(W0_86) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_153]) ).

tff(c_22951,plain,
    ! [W0_193,W2_194] :
      ( sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(W0_193,W0_193,W2_194)
      | ~ aDivisorOf0(W2_194,sz00)
      | ( sz00 = W2_194 )
      | ~ aInteger0(W2_194)
      | ~ aInteger0(W0_193)
      | ~ aInteger0(W0_193)
      | ~ aInteger0(W0_193) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_24,c_1697]) ).

tff(c_68,plain,
    ~ sdteqdtlpzmzozddtrp0(xa,xa,xq),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_161]) ).

tff(c_22957,plain,
    ( ~ aDivisorOf0(xq,sz00)
    | ( xq = sz00 )
    | ~ aInteger0(xq)
    | ~ aInteger0(xa) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_22951,c_68]) ).

tff(c_22961,plain,
    xq = sz00,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_66,c_64,c_1357,c_22957]) ).

tff(c_22963,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_62,c_22961]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : NUM423+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 14:30:27 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 13.74/4.64  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 13.74/4.65  
% 13.74/4.65  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 13.93/4.67  
% 13.93/4.67  Inference rules
% 13.93/4.67  ----------------------
% 13.93/4.67  #Ref     : 0
% 13.93/4.67  #Sup     : 4852
% 13.93/4.67  #Fact    : 0
% 13.93/4.67  #Define  : 0
% 13.93/4.67  #Split   : 8
% 13.93/4.67  #Chain   : 0
% 13.93/4.67  #Close   : 0
% 13.93/4.67  
% 13.93/4.67  Ordering : KBO
% 13.93/4.67  
% 13.93/4.67  Simplification rules
% 13.93/4.67  ----------------------
% 13.93/4.67  #Subsume      : 603
% 13.93/4.67  #Demod        : 7873
% 13.93/4.67  #Tautology    : 2117
% 13.93/4.67  #SimpNegUnit  : 129
% 13.93/4.67  #BackRed      : 81
% 13.93/4.67  
% 13.93/4.67  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 13.93/4.67  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 13.93/4.67  
% 13.93/4.67  Timing (in seconds)
% 13.93/4.67  ----------------------
% 13.93/4.68  Preprocessing        : 0.55
% 13.93/4.68  Parsing              : 0.29
% 13.93/4.68  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 13.93/4.68  Main loop            : 3.06
% 13.93/4.68  Inferencing          : 0.80
% 13.93/4.68  Reduction            : 1.42
% 13.93/4.68  Demodulation         : 1.17
% 13.93/4.68  BG Simplification    : 0.08
% 13.93/4.68  Subsumption          : 0.58
% 13.93/4.68  Abstraction          : 0.12
% 13.93/4.68  MUC search           : 0.00
% 13.93/4.68  Cooper               : 0.00
% 13.93/4.68  Total                : 3.66
% 13.93/4.68  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 13.93/4.68  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 13.93/4.68  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 13.93/4.68  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------