TSTP Solution File: NUM414+1 by Princess---230619

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : NUM414+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 11:47:37 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 11.29s 2.33s
% Output   : Proof 14.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : NUM414+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 10:18:22 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.60  ________       _____
% 0.18/0.60  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.18/0.60  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.18/0.60  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.18/0.60  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.18/0.60  
% 0.18/0.60  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.18/0.60  (2023-06-19)
% 0.18/0.60  
% 0.18/0.60  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.18/0.60  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.18/0.60                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.18/0.60  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.18/0.60  
% 0.18/0.60  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.18/0.60  
% 0.18/0.60  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.18/0.61  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.18/0.62  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.18/0.62  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.18/0.62  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.18/0.62  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.18/0.62  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.18/0.62  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.18/0.62  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 2.75/1.11  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 2.75/1.11  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.18/1.15  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 3.18/1.15  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 3.18/1.15  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 3.18/1.15  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 3.18/1.15  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 5.22/1.51  Prover 2: Proving ...
% 5.22/1.51  Prover 5: Proving ...
% 6.12/1.58  Prover 1: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.48/1.63  Prover 6: Proving ...
% 6.48/1.63  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.48/1.64  Prover 3: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.48/1.65  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 6.66/1.65  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 6.66/1.67  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.17/1.76  Prover 0: Proving ...
% 8.27/1.91  Prover 1: gave up
% 8.27/1.92  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 8.27/1.92  Prover 3: gave up
% 8.27/1.92  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 8.85/2.00  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 8.85/2.01  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 8.85/2.14  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 8.85/2.15  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.05/2.19  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 10.71/2.21  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.29/2.33  Prover 0: proved (1713ms)
% 11.29/2.33  
% 11.29/2.33  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 11.29/2.33  
% 11.29/2.33  Prover 5: stopped
% 11.29/2.35  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 11.29/2.35  Prover 2: stopped
% 11.29/2.36  Prover 6: stopped
% 11.29/2.37  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 11.29/2.37  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 11.29/2.37  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 11.92/2.37  Prover 16: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683
% 12.24/2.41  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 12.24/2.42  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 12.33/2.42  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 12.33/2.44  Prover 16: Preprocessing ...
% 12.33/2.45  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.33/2.45  Prover 8: gave up
% 12.33/2.46  Prover 19: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=-1780594085
% 12.33/2.50  Prover 19: Preprocessing ...
% 12.97/2.53  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 12.97/2.54  Prover 16: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 12.97/2.55  Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.97/2.55  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.53/2.66  Prover 11: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 13.53/2.66  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.30/2.70  Prover 19: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 14.30/2.74  Prover 19: Constructing countermodel ...
% 14.30/2.76  Prover 10: Found proof (size 17)
% 14.30/2.76  Prover 10: proved (425ms)
% 14.30/2.76  Prover 16: stopped
% 14.30/2.76  Prover 19: stopped
% 14.30/2.76  Prover 13: stopped
% 14.30/2.76  Prover 7: stopped
% 14.30/2.76  Prover 4: stopped
% 14.30/2.76  Prover 11: stopped
% 14.30/2.76  
% 14.30/2.76  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 14.30/2.76  
% 14.30/2.76  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 14.30/2.77  Assumptions after simplification:
% 14.30/2.77  ---------------------------------
% 14.30/2.77  
% 14.30/2.77    (connectedness_r1_ordinal1)
% 14.30/2.77     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ ordinal(v1) |  ~
% 14.30/2.77      ordinal(v0) | ordinal_subset(v1, v0) | ordinal_subset(v0, v1))
% 14.30/2.77  
% 14.30/2.77    (d8_xboole_0)
% 14.30/2.78     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ subset(v0,
% 14.30/2.78        v1) | proper_subset(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~
% 14.30/2.78      $i(v0) |  ~ proper_subset(v0, v1) | subset(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0: $i] : ( ~
% 14.30/2.78      $i(v0) |  ~ proper_subset(v0, v0))
% 14.30/2.78  
% 14.30/2.78    (redefinition_r1_ordinal1)
% 14.30/2.78     ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ subset(v0, v1) |  ~
% 14.30/2.78      ordinal(v1) |  ~ ordinal(v0) | ordinal_subset(v0, v1)) &  ! [v0: $i] :  !
% 14.30/2.78    [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~ ordinal_subset(v0, v1) |  ~ ordinal(v1)
% 14.30/2.78      |  ~ ordinal(v0) | subset(v0, v1))
% 14.30/2.78  
% 14.30/2.78    (t50_ordinal1)
% 14.30/2.78     ? [v0: $i] :  ? [v1: $i] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & ordinal(v1) &
% 14.30/2.78      ordinal(v0) &  ~ proper_subset(v1, v0) &  ~ proper_subset(v0, v1))
% 14.30/2.78  
% 14.30/2.78  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 14.30/2.78  --------------------------------------------
% 14.30/2.78  antisymmetry_r2_hidden, antisymmetry_r2_xboole_0, cc1_funct_1, cc1_ordinal1,
% 14.30/2.78  cc1_relat_1, cc2_funct_1, cc2_ordinal1, cc3_ordinal1, existence_m1_subset_1,
% 14.30/2.78  fc12_relat_1, fc1_xboole_0, fc2_ordinal1, fc4_relat_1,
% 14.30/2.78  irreflexivity_r2_xboole_0, rc1_funct_1, rc1_ordinal1, rc1_relat_1, rc1_xboole_0,
% 14.30/2.78  rc2_funct_1, rc2_ordinal1, rc2_relat_1, rc2_xboole_0, rc3_funct_1, rc3_ordinal1,
% 14.30/2.78  rc3_relat_1, rc4_funct_1, rc4_ordinal1, rc5_funct_1, reflexivity_r1_ordinal1,
% 14.30/2.78  reflexivity_r1_tarski, t1_subset, t2_subset, t3_subset, t4_subset, t5_subset,
% 14.30/2.78  t6_boole, t7_boole, t8_boole
% 14.30/2.78  
% 14.30/2.78  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 14.30/2.78  ---------------------------------
% 14.30/2.78  
% 14.30/2.78  Begin of proof
% 14.30/2.78  | 
% 14.30/2.78  | ALPHA: (d8_xboole_0) implies:
% 14.30/2.78  |   (1)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : (v1 = v0 |  ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 14.30/2.78  |          subset(v0, v1) | proper_subset(v0, v1))
% 14.30/2.78  | 
% 14.30/2.78  | ALPHA: (redefinition_r1_ordinal1) implies:
% 14.30/2.79  |   (2)   ! [v0: $i] :  ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) |  ~ $i(v0) |  ~
% 14.30/2.79  |          ordinal_subset(v0, v1) |  ~ ordinal(v1) |  ~ ordinal(v0) | subset(v0,
% 14.30/2.79  |            v1))
% 14.30/2.79  | 
% 14.30/2.79  | DELTA: instantiating (t50_ordinal1) with fresh symbols all_53_0, all_53_1
% 14.30/2.79  |        gives:
% 14.30/2.79  |   (3)   ~ (all_53_0 = all_53_1) & $i(all_53_0) & $i(all_53_1) &
% 14.30/2.79  |        ordinal(all_53_0) & ordinal(all_53_1) &  ~ proper_subset(all_53_0,
% 14.30/2.79  |          all_53_1) &  ~ proper_subset(all_53_1, all_53_0)
% 14.30/2.79  | 
% 14.30/2.79  | ALPHA: (3) implies:
% 14.30/2.79  |   (4)   ~ (all_53_0 = all_53_1)
% 14.30/2.79  |   (5)   ~ proper_subset(all_53_1, all_53_0)
% 14.30/2.79  |   (6)   ~ proper_subset(all_53_0, all_53_1)
% 14.30/2.79  |   (7)  ordinal(all_53_1)
% 14.30/2.79  |   (8)  ordinal(all_53_0)
% 14.30/2.79  |   (9)  $i(all_53_1)
% 14.30/2.79  |   (10)  $i(all_53_0)
% 14.30/2.79  | 
% 14.30/2.79  | GROUND_INST: instantiating (connectedness_r1_ordinal1) with all_53_1,
% 14.30/2.79  |              all_53_0, simplifying with (7), (8), (9), (10) gives:
% 14.30/2.79  |   (11)  ordinal_subset(all_53_0, all_53_1) | ordinal_subset(all_53_1,
% 14.30/2.79  |           all_53_0)
% 14.30/2.79  | 
% 14.30/2.79  | BETA: splitting (11) gives:
% 14.30/2.79  | 
% 14.30/2.79  | Case 1:
% 14.30/2.79  | | 
% 14.30/2.79  | |   (12)  ordinal_subset(all_53_0, all_53_1)
% 14.30/2.79  | | 
% 14.30/2.79  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_53_0, all_53_1, simplifying with
% 14.30/2.79  | |              (7), (8), (9), (10), (12) gives:
% 14.30/2.79  | |   (13)  subset(all_53_0, all_53_1)
% 14.30/2.79  | | 
% 14.30/2.79  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_53_0, all_53_1, simplifying with
% 14.30/2.79  | |              (6), (9), (10), (13) gives:
% 14.30/2.79  | |   (14)  all_53_0 = all_53_1
% 14.30/2.79  | | 
% 14.30/2.79  | | REDUCE: (4), (14) imply:
% 14.30/2.79  | |   (15)  $false
% 14.30/2.79  | | 
% 14.30/2.79  | | CLOSE: (15) is inconsistent.
% 14.30/2.79  | | 
% 14.30/2.79  | Case 2:
% 14.30/2.79  | | 
% 14.30/2.79  | |   (16)  ordinal_subset(all_53_1, all_53_0)
% 14.30/2.79  | | 
% 14.30/2.79  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_53_1, all_53_0, simplifying with
% 14.30/2.79  | |              (7), (8), (9), (10), (16) gives:
% 14.30/2.80  | |   (17)  subset(all_53_1, all_53_0)
% 14.30/2.80  | | 
% 14.30/2.80  | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_53_1, all_53_0, simplifying with
% 14.30/2.80  | |              (5), (9), (10), (17) gives:
% 14.30/2.80  | |   (18)  all_53_0 = all_53_1
% 14.30/2.80  | | 
% 14.30/2.80  | | REDUCE: (4), (18) imply:
% 14.30/2.80  | |   (19)  $false
% 14.30/2.80  | | 
% 14.30/2.80  | | CLOSE: (19) is inconsistent.
% 14.30/2.80  | | 
% 14.30/2.80  | End of split
% 14.30/2.80  | 
% 14.30/2.80  End of proof
% 14.30/2.80  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 14.30/2.80  
% 14.30/2.80  2200ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------