TSTP Solution File: NUM412+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : NUM412+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:25:57 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.44s
% Output   : Refutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  22 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   43 (   0 equ;  25 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ordinal(skc19),
    file('NUM412+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(52,axiom,
    transfinite_sequence_of(skc18,skc17),
    file('NUM412+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(60,axiom,
    ( ~ ordinal(u)
    | epsilon_transitive(u) ),
    file('NUM412+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(61,axiom,
    ( ~ ordinal(u)
    | epsilon_connected(u) ),
    file('NUM412+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(66,axiom,
    ~ transfinite_sequence_of(tseq_dom_restriction(skc18,skc19),skc17),
    file('NUM412+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(67,axiom,
    ( ~ transfinite_sequence_of(u,v)
    | relation(u) ),
    file('NUM412+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(68,axiom,
    ( ~ transfinite_sequence_of(u,v)
    | function(u) ),
    file('NUM412+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(69,axiom,
    ( ~ transfinite_sequence_of(u,v)
    | transfinite_sequence(u) ),
    file('NUM412+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(88,axiom,
    ( ~ transfinite_sequence_of(u,v)
    | ~ subset(v,w)
    | transfinite_sequence_of(u,w) ),
    file('NUM412+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(92,axiom,
    ( ~ transfinite_sequence(u)
    | ~ function(u)
    | ~ relation(u)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(u,v)
    | subset(relation_rng(u),v) ),
    file('NUM412+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(94,axiom,
    ( ~ ordinal(u)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence(v)
    | ~ function(v)
    | ~ relation(v)
    | transfinite_sequence_of(tseq_dom_restriction(v,u),relation_rng(v)) ),
    file('NUM412+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(97,plain,
    ( ~ transfinite_sequence_of(u,v)
    | subset(relation_rng(u),v) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[92,69,68,67]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:92.0,92.1,92.2,69.1,68.1,67.1')] ).

cnf(98,plain,
    epsilon_transitive(skc19),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,60]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,60.0')] ).

cnf(99,plain,
    epsilon_connected(skc19),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[1,61]),
    [iquote('0:Res:1.0,61.0')] ).

cnf(103,plain,
    subset(relation_rng(skc18),skc17),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[52,97]),
    [iquote('0:Res:52.0,97.0')] ).

cnf(104,plain,
    relation(skc18),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[52,67]),
    [iquote('0:Res:52.0,67.0')] ).

cnf(105,plain,
    function(skc18),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[52,68]),
    [iquote('0:Res:52.0,68.0')] ).

cnf(106,plain,
    transfinite_sequence(skc18),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[52,69]),
    [iquote('0:Res:52.0,69.0')] ).

cnf(108,plain,
    ( ~ subset(u,skc17)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence_of(tseq_dom_restriction(skc18,skc19),u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[88,66]),
    [iquote('0:Res:88.2,66.0')] ).

cnf(205,plain,
    ( ~ ordinal(skc19)
    | ~ transfinite_sequence(skc18)
    | ~ function(skc18)
    | ~ relation(skc18)
    | ~ subset(relation_rng(skc18),skc17) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[94,108]),
    [iquote('0:Res:94.4,108.1')] ).

cnf(211,plain,
    ~ subset(relation_rng(skc18),skc17),
    inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[205,106,105,104,1,99,98]),
    [iquote('0:SSi:205.3,205.2,205.1,205.0,106.0,105.0,104.0,106.0,105.0,104.0,106.0,105.0,104.0,1.0,99.0,98.0')] ).

cnf(212,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[211,103]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:211.0,103.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : NUM412+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 19:31:35 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.44  
% 0.16/0.44  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.16/0.44  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.16/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.44  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.16/0.44  SPASS derived 105 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 141 clauses.
% 0.16/0.44  SPASS allocated 97760 KBytes.
% 0.16/0.44  SPASS spent	0:00:00.11 on the problem.
% 0.16/0.44  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.16/0.44  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.16/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.16/0.44  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.16/0.44  		0:00:00.01 for the reduction.
% 0.16/0.44  
% 0.16/0.44  
% 0.16/0.44  Here is a proof with depth 2, length 22 :
% 0.16/0.44  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.44  Formulae used in the proof : t48_ordinal1 cc1_ordinal1 dt_m1_ordinal1 t47_ordinal1 d8_ordinal1 dt_k2_ordinal1
% 0.16/0.44  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------