TSTP Solution File: NUM403+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUM403+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:32:08 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.25s 6.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  157 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   20 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  192 (  76   ~;  79   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   1 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   84 (   5 sgn  42   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t34_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ordinal(X1)
     => ! [X2] :
          ( ordinal(X2)
         => ( in(X1,succ(X2))
          <=> ordinal_subset(X1,X2) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t34_ordinal1) ).

fof(d1_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1] : succ(X1) = set_union2(X1,singleton(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d1_ordinal1) ).

fof(d4_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X2 = union(X1)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X2)
        <=> ? [X4] :
              ( in(X3,X4)
              & in(X4,X1) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d4_tarski) ).

fof(d3_tarski,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( in(X3,X1)
         => in(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',d3_tarski) ).

fof(redefinition_r1_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( ordinal(X1)
        & ordinal(X2) )
     => ( ordinal_subset(X1,X2)
      <=> subset(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',redefinition_r1_ordinal1) ).

fof(t36_ordinal1,conjecture,
    ! [X1] :
      ~ ( ! [X2] :
            ( in(X2,X1)
           => ordinal(X2) )
        & ! [X2] :
            ( ordinal(X2)
           => ~ subset(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t36_ordinal1) ).

fof(fc3_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ordinal(X1)
     => ( ~ empty(succ(X1))
        & epsilon_transitive(succ(X1))
        & epsilon_connected(succ(X1))
        & ordinal(succ(X1)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fc3_ordinal1) ).

fof(t35_ordinal1,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ! [X2] :
          ( in(X2,X1)
         => ordinal(X2) )
     => ordinal(union(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',t35_ordinal1) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ in(X3,succ(X4))
        | ordinal_subset(X3,X4)
        | ~ ordinal(X4)
        | ~ ordinal(X3) )
      & ( ~ ordinal_subset(X3,X4)
        | in(X3,succ(X4))
        | ~ ordinal(X4)
        | ~ ordinal(X3) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t34_ordinal1])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X2] : succ(X2) = set_union2(X2,singleton(X2)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[d1_ordinal1]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X7,X9,X5,X6,X11] :
      ( ( in(X7,esk2_3(X5,X6,X7))
        | ~ in(X7,X6)
        | X6 != union(X5) )
      & ( in(esk2_3(X5,X6,X7),X5)
        | ~ in(X7,X6)
        | X6 != union(X5) )
      & ( ~ in(X7,X9)
        | ~ in(X9,X5)
        | in(X7,X6)
        | X6 != union(X5) )
      & ( ~ in(esk3_2(X5,X6),X6)
        | ~ in(esk3_2(X5,X6),X11)
        | ~ in(X11,X5)
        | X6 = union(X5) )
      & ( in(esk3_2(X5,X6),esk4_2(X5,X6))
        | in(esk3_2(X5,X6),X6)
        | X6 = union(X5) )
      & ( in(esk4_2(X5,X6),X5)
        | in(esk3_2(X5,X6),X6)
        | X6 = union(X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d4_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X4,X5)
        | ~ in(X6,X4)
        | in(X6,X5) )
      & ( in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X4)
        | subset(X4,X5) )
      & ( ~ in(esk1_2(X4,X5),X5)
        | subset(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d3_tarski])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( in(X1,succ(X2))
    | ~ ordinal(X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X2)
    | ~ ordinal_subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    succ(X1) = set_union2(X1,singleton(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] :
      ( ( ~ ordinal_subset(X3,X4)
        | subset(X3,X4)
        | ~ ordinal(X3)
        | ~ ordinal(X4) )
      & ( ~ subset(X3,X4)
        | ordinal_subset(X3,X4)
        | ~ ordinal(X3)
        | ~ ordinal(X4) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[redefinition_r1_ordinal1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( in(X3,X1)
    | X1 != union(X2)
    | ~ in(X4,X2)
    | ~ in(X3,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( in(X1,set_union2(X2,singleton(X2)))
    | ~ ordinal(X2)
    | ~ ordinal(X1)
    | ~ ordinal_subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ordinal_subset(X2,X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | in(X3,X4)
    | X4 != union(X1)
    | ~ in(X3,esk1_2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] :
        ~ ( ! [X2] :
              ( in(X2,X1)
             => ordinal(X2) )
          & ! [X2] :
              ( ordinal(X2)
             => ~ subset(X1,X2) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t36_ordinal1]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ in(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( in(X1,set_union2(X2,singleton(X2)))
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ ordinal(X2)
    | ~ ordinal(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( subset(esk1_2(X1,X2),X3)
    | subset(X1,X2)
    | in(esk1_2(esk1_2(X1,X2),X3),X4)
    | X4 != union(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ( ~ in(X4,esk20_0)
        | ordinal(X4) )
      & ( ~ ordinal(X5)
        | ~ subset(esk20_0,X5) ) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( subset(X1,set_union2(X2,singleton(X2)))
    | ~ subset(esk1_2(X1,set_union2(X2,singleton(X2))),X2)
    | ~ ordinal(esk1_2(X1,set_union2(X2,singleton(X2))))
    | ~ ordinal(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( subset(esk1_2(X1,X2),X3)
    | subset(X1,X2)
    | X3 != union(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ordinal(X1)
    | ~ in(X1,esk20_0) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

fof(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ( ~ empty(succ(X2))
        | ~ ordinal(X2) )
      & ( epsilon_transitive(succ(X2))
        | ~ ordinal(X2) )
      & ( epsilon_connected(succ(X2))
        | ~ ordinal(X2) )
      & ( ordinal(succ(X2))
        | ~ ordinal(X2) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fc3_ordinal1])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( subset(X1,set_union2(X2,singleton(X2)))
    | X2 != union(X1)
    | ~ ordinal(esk1_2(X1,set_union2(X2,singleton(X2))))
    | ~ ordinal(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk20_0,X1)
    | ordinal(esk1_2(esk20_0,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ordinal(succ(X1))
    | ~ ordinal(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

fof(c_0_32,plain,
    ! [X3] :
      ( ( in(esk19_1(X3),X3)
        | ordinal(union(X3)) )
      & ( ~ ordinal(esk19_1(X3))
        | ordinal(union(X3)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t35_ordinal1])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(esk20_0,X1)
    | ~ ordinal(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( subset(esk20_0,set_union2(X1,singleton(X1)))
    | X1 != union(esk20_0)
    | ~ ordinal(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ordinal(set_union2(X1,singleton(X1)))
    | ~ ordinal(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ordinal(union(X1))
    | in(esk19_1(X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ordinal(union(X1))
    | ~ ordinal(esk19_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( X1 != union(esk20_0)
    | ~ ordinal(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ordinal(union(esk20_0)),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_36]),c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]),c_0_39])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : NUM403+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 22:57:20 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.25/6.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/6.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.018 s
% 0.25/6.42  
% 0.25/6.42  # Proof found!
% 0.25/6.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/6.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/6.42  # Proof object total steps             : 41
% 0.25/6.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 24
% 0.25/6.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 17
% 0.25/6.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 10
% 0.25/6.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 7
% 0.25/6.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.25/6.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 11
% 0.25/6.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 8
% 0.25/6.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 11
% 0.25/6.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 6
% 0.25/6.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/6.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 53
% 0.25/6.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.25/6.42  # Initial clauses                      : 108
% 0.25/6.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 3
% 0.25/6.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 105
% 0.25/6.42  # Processed clauses                    : 9083
% 0.25/6.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 21
% 0.25/6.42  # ...subsumed                          : 3929
% 0.25/6.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 5133
% 0.25/6.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.25/6.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 234909
% 0.25/6.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 137
% 0.25/6.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 35
% 0.25/6.42  # Generated clauses                    : 361931
% 0.25/6.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 360785
% 0.25/6.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3900
% 0.25/6.42  # Paramodulations                      : 361399
% 0.25/6.42  # Factorizations                       : 16
% 0.25/6.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 375
% 0.25/6.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 4906
% 0.25/6.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 102
% 0.25/6.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.25/6.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 65
% 0.25/6.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4738
% 0.25/6.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 105938
% 0.25/6.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 531499
% 0.25/6.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.25/6.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 173
% 0.25/6.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3256137
% 0.25/6.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1230702
% 0.25/6.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 7371
% 0.25/6.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 35100
% 0.25/6.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.25/6.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 253
% 0.25/6.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 19
% 0.25/6.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.25/6.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.25/6.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 6200503
% 0.25/6.42  
% 0.25/6.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/6.42  # User time                : 4.962 s
% 0.25/6.42  # System time              : 0.099 s
% 0.25/6.42  # Total time               : 5.061 s
% 0.25/6.42  # Maximum resident set size: 132488 pages
% 0.25/23.38  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.39  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.40  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.40  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.40  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.40  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.40  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.40  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.40  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.40  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.47  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.48  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.49  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.50  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------