TSTP Solution File: NUM395+1 by CSE---1.6

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.6
% Problem  : NUM395+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 10:21:55 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : NUM395+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri Aug 25 14:25:07 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.57  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62  % File        :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.62  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.62  % Transform   :cnf
% 0.20/0.62  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.62  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  % Result      :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.62  % Output      :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.62  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62  % File     : NUM395+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.20/0.62  % Domain   : Number Theory (Ordinals)
% 0.20/0.62  % Problem  : Ordinal numbers, theorem 27
% 0.20/0.62  % Version  : [Urb06] axioms : Especial.
% 0.20/0.62  % English  :
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  % Refs     : [Ban90] Bancerek (1990), The Ordinal Numbers
% 0.20/0.62  %            [Urb06] Urban (2006), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 0.20/0.62  % Source   : [Urb06]
% 0.20/0.62  % Names    : ordinal1__t27_ordinal1 [Urb06]
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.20/0.62  % Rating   : 0.06 v8.1.0, 0.03 v7.4.0, 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.04 v6.1.0, 0.10 v6.0.0, 0.09 v5.5.0, 0.07 v5.3.0, 0.15 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.2.0
% 0.20/0.62  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (   5 unt;   0 def)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Number of atoms       :   68 (   2 equ)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Number of connectives :   45 (   6   ~;   1   |;  28   &)
% 0.20/0.62  %                                         (   1 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Number of predicates  :   12 (  11 usr;   0 prp; 1-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.20/0.62  %            Number of variables   :   30 (  18   !;  12   ?)
% 0.20/0.62  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  % Comments : Translated by MPTP 0.2 from the original problem in the Mizar
% 0.20/0.62  %            library, www.mizar.org
% 0.20/0.62  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.62  fof(existence_m1_subset_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ! [A] :
% 0.20/0.62      ? [B] : element(B,A) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(t2_subset,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ! [A,B] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( element(A,B)
% 0.20/0.62       => ( empty(B)
% 0.20/0.62          | in(A,B) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(antisymmetry_r2_hidden,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ! [A,B] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( in(A,B)
% 0.20/0.62       => ~ in(B,A) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(t1_subset,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ! [A,B] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( in(A,B)
% 0.20/0.62       => element(A,B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(cc1_funct_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ! [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( empty(A)
% 0.20/0.62       => function(A) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(cc2_funct_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ! [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( ( relation(A)
% 0.20/0.62          & empty(A)
% 0.20/0.62          & function(A) )
% 0.20/0.62       => ( relation(A)
% 0.20/0.62          & function(A)
% 0.20/0.62          & one_to_one(A) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(cc1_relat_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ! [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( empty(A)
% 0.20/0.62       => relation(A) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(t7_boole,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ! [A,B] :
% 0.20/0.62        ~ ( in(A,B)
% 0.20/0.62          & empty(B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(t8_boole,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ! [A,B] :
% 0.20/0.62        ~ ( empty(A)
% 0.20/0.62          & A != B
% 0.20/0.62          & empty(B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(cc1_ordinal1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ! [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( ordinal(A)
% 0.20/0.62       => ( epsilon_transitive(A)
% 0.20/0.62          & epsilon_connected(A) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(cc2_ordinal1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ! [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( ( epsilon_transitive(A)
% 0.20/0.62          & epsilon_connected(A) )
% 0.20/0.62       => ordinal(A) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(rc1_ordinal1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ? [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( epsilon_transitive(A)
% 0.20/0.62        & epsilon_connected(A)
% 0.20/0.62        & ordinal(A) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(rc1_funct_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ? [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( relation(A)
% 0.20/0.62        & function(A) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(rc2_funct_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ? [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( relation(A)
% 0.20/0.62        & empty(A)
% 0.20/0.62        & function(A) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(rc3_funct_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ? [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( relation(A)
% 0.20/0.62        & function(A)
% 0.20/0.62        & one_to_one(A) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(rc4_funct_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ? [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( relation(A)
% 0.20/0.62        & relation_empty_yielding(A)
% 0.20/0.62        & function(A) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(rc5_funct_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ? [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( relation(A)
% 0.20/0.62        & relation_non_empty(A)
% 0.20/0.62        & function(A) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(fc4_relat_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ( empty(empty_set)
% 0.20/0.62      & relation(empty_set) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(fc12_relat_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ( empty(empty_set)
% 0.20/0.62      & relation(empty_set)
% 0.20/0.62      & relation_empty_yielding(empty_set) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(rc1_relat_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ? [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( empty(A)
% 0.20/0.62        & relation(A) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(rc2_relat_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ? [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( ~ empty(A)
% 0.20/0.62        & relation(A) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(rc3_relat_1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ? [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( relation(A)
% 0.20/0.62        & relation_empty_yielding(A) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(fc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      empty(empty_set) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(rc1_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ? [A] : empty(A) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(rc2_xboole_0,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ? [A] : ~ empty(A) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(t6_boole,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ! [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( empty(A)
% 0.20/0.62       => A = empty_set ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(t27_ordinal1,conjecture,
% 0.20/0.62      ordinal(empty_set) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.62  fof(d4_ordinal1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.62      ! [A] :
% 0.20/0.62        ( ordinal(A)
% 0.20/0.62      <=> ( epsilon_transitive(A)
% 0.20/0.62          & epsilon_connected(A) ) ) ).
% 0.20/0.62  
% 0.20/0.63  fof(l18_ordinal1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.63      ( epsilon_transitive(empty_set)
% 0.20/0.63      & epsilon_connected(empty_set) ) ).
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  % Proof found
% 0.20/0.63  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.63  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.63  %ClaNum:67(EqnAxiom:17)
% 0.20/0.63  %VarNum:39(SingletonVarNum:18)
% 0.20/0.63  %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.20/0.63  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.63  %SharedTerms:43
% 0.20/0.63  %goalClause: 52
% 0.20/0.63  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 0.20/0.63  [20]P1(a1)
% 0.20/0.63  [21]P1(a2)
% 0.20/0.63  [22]P1(a9)
% 0.20/0.63  [23]P1(a3)
% 0.20/0.63  [24]P3(a5)
% 0.20/0.63  [25]P3(a2)
% 0.20/0.63  [26]P3(a10)
% 0.20/0.63  [27]P3(a11)
% 0.20/0.63  [28]P3(a12)
% 0.20/0.63  [30]P6(a1)
% 0.20/0.63  [31]P6(a5)
% 0.20/0.63  [32]P6(a2)
% 0.20/0.63  [33]P6(a10)
% 0.20/0.63  [34]P6(a11)
% 0.20/0.63  [35]P6(a12)
% 0.20/0.63  [36]P6(a9)
% 0.20/0.63  [37]P6(a13)
% 0.20/0.63  [38]P6(a4)
% 0.20/0.63  [39]P7(a10)
% 0.20/0.63  [40]P9(a6)
% 0.20/0.63  [41]P4(a1)
% 0.20/0.63  [42]P4(a6)
% 0.20/0.63  [43]P5(a1)
% 0.20/0.63  [44]P5(a6)
% 0.20/0.63  [45]P10(a1)
% 0.20/0.63  [46]P10(a11)
% 0.20/0.63  [47]P10(a4)
% 0.20/0.63  [48]P11(a12)
% 0.20/0.63  [50]~P1(a13)
% 0.20/0.63  [51]~P1(a8)
% 0.20/0.63  [52]~P9(a1)
% 0.20/0.63  [49]P2(f7(x491),x491)
% 0.20/0.63  [53]~P1(x531)+E(x531,a1)
% 0.20/0.63  [54]~P1(x541)+P3(x541)
% 0.20/0.63  [55]~P1(x551)+P6(x551)
% 0.20/0.63  [57]~P9(x571)+P4(x571)
% 0.20/0.63  [59]~P9(x591)+P5(x591)
% 0.20/0.63  [64]~P1(x641)+~P8(x642,x641)
% 0.20/0.63  [65]~P8(x651,x652)+P2(x651,x652)
% 0.20/0.63  [67]~P8(x672,x671)+~P8(x671,x672)
% 0.20/0.63  [62]~P4(x621)+~P5(x621)+P9(x621)
% 0.20/0.63  [60]~P1(x602)+~P1(x601)+E(x601,x602)
% 0.20/0.63  [66]~P2(x662,x661)+P1(x661)+P8(x662,x661)
% 0.20/0.63  [63]~P1(x631)+~P3(x631)+~P6(x631)+P7(x631)
% 0.20/0.63  %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.63  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 0.20/0.63  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 0.20/0.63  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 0.20/0.63  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f7(x41),f7(x42))
% 0.20/0.63  [5]~P1(x51)+P1(x52)+~E(x51,x52)
% 0.20/0.63  [6]P8(x62,x63)+~E(x61,x62)+~P8(x61,x63)
% 0.20/0.63  [7]P8(x73,x72)+~E(x71,x72)+~P8(x73,x71)
% 0.20/0.63  [8]~P9(x81)+P9(x82)+~E(x81,x82)
% 0.20/0.63  [9]P2(x92,x93)+~E(x91,x92)+~P2(x91,x93)
% 0.20/0.63  [10]P2(x103,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P2(x103,x101)
% 0.20/0.63  [11]~P5(x111)+P5(x112)+~E(x111,x112)
% 0.20/0.63  [12]~P4(x121)+P4(x122)+~E(x121,x122)
% 0.20/0.63  [13]~P3(x131)+P3(x132)+~E(x131,x132)
% 0.20/0.63  [14]~P11(x141)+P11(x142)+~E(x141,x142)
% 0.20/0.63  [15]~P10(x151)+P10(x152)+~E(x151,x152)
% 0.20/0.63  [16]~P6(x161)+P6(x162)+~E(x161,x162)
% 0.20/0.63  [17]~P7(x171)+P7(x172)+~E(x171,x172)
% 0.20/0.63  
% 0.20/0.63  %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.63  cnf(68,plain,
% 0.20/0.63     ($false),
% 0.20/0.63     inference(scs_inference,[],[41,43,52,62]),
% 0.20/0.63     ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.63  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.63  % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------