TSTP Solution File: NUM386+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : NUM386+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:25:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 3.73s 3.90s
% Output   : Refutation 3.73s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   40 (  14 unt;  11 nHn;  40 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   78 (   0 equ;  37 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(29,axiom,
    element(skf5(u),u),
    file('NUM386+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(37,axiom,
    equal(set_union2(u,singleton(u)),succ(u)),
    file('NUM386+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(41,axiom,
    ( ~ empty(u)
    | ~ in(v,u) ),
    file('NUM386+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(43,axiom,
    ( ~ in(skc12,skc13)
    | ~ in(skc12,succ(skc13)) ),
    file('NUM386+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(44,axiom,
    ( ~ equal(skc13,skc12)
    | ~ in(skc12,succ(skc13)) ),
    file('NUM386+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(45,axiom,
    ( ~ element(u,v)
    | empty(v)
    | in(u,v) ),
    file('NUM386+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(47,axiom,
    ( equal(skc13,skc12)
    | in(skc12,skc13)
    | in(skc12,succ(skc13)) ),
    file('NUM386+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(51,axiom,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | ~ equal(v,singleton(w))
    | equal(u,w) ),
    file('NUM386+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(52,axiom,
    ( ~ equal(u,v)
    | ~ equal(w,singleton(v))
    | in(u,w) ),
    file('NUM386+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(53,axiom,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | ~ equal(w,set_union2(v,x))
    | in(u,w) ),
    file('NUM386+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(54,axiom,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | ~ equal(w,set_union2(x,v))
    | in(u,w) ),
    file('NUM386+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(56,axiom,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | ~ equal(v,set_union2(w,x))
    | in(u,x)
    | in(u,w) ),
    file('NUM386+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(61,plain,
    equal(skc13,skc12),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s1)])],[47]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:47.0')] ).

cnf(62,plain,
    ( ~ equal(skc12,skc12)
    | ~ in(skc12,succ(skc13)) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[61,44]),
    [iquote('1:Rew:61.0,44.0')] ).

cnf(64,plain,
    ~ in(skc12,succ(skc13)),
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[62]),
    [iquote('1:Obv:62.0')] ).

cnf(65,plain,
    ~ in(skc12,succ(skc12)),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[61,64]),
    [iquote('1:Rew:61.0,64.0')] ).

cnf(113,plain,
    ( empty(u)
    | in(skf5(u),u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[29,45]),
    [iquote('0:Res:29.0,45.0')] ).

cnf(129,plain,
    ( ~ equal(u,v)
    | in(u,singleton(v)) ),
    inference(eqr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[52]),
    [iquote('0:EqR:52.1')] ).

cnf(132,plain,
    ( ~ empty(singleton(u))
    | ~ equal(v,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[129,41]),
    [iquote('0:Res:129.1,41.1')] ).

cnf(134,plain,
    ~ empty(singleton(u)),
    inference(aed,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[132]),
    [iquote('0:AED:132.1')] ).

cnf(135,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,singleton(v))
    | equal(u,v) ),
    inference(eqr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[51]),
    [iquote('0:EqR:51.1')] ).

cnf(141,plain,
    ( empty(singleton(u))
    | equal(skf5(singleton(u)),u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[113,135]),
    [iquote('0:Res:113.1,135.0')] ).

cnf(144,plain,
    equal(skf5(singleton(u)),u),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[141,134]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:141.0,134.0')] ).

cnf(148,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,singleton(v))
    | ~ equal(w,succ(v))
    | in(u,w) ),
    inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[37,54]),
    [iquote('0:SpL:37.0,54.1')] ).

cnf(154,plain,
    ( empty(singleton(u))
    | in(u,singleton(u)) ),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[144,113]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:144.0,113.1')] ).

cnf(158,plain,
    in(u,singleton(u)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[154,134]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:154.0,134.0')] ).

cnf(166,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | in(u,set_union2(v,w)) ),
    inference(eqr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[53]),
    [iquote('0:EqR:53.1')] ).

cnf(196,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,set_union2(v,w))
    | in(u,w)
    | in(u,v) ),
    inference(eqr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[56]),
    [iquote('0:EqR:56.1')] ).

cnf(304,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | in(u,succ(v)) ),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[37,166]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:37.0,166.1')] ).

cnf(396,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,succ(v))
    | in(u,singleton(v))
    | in(u,v) ),
    inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[37,196]),
    [iquote('0:SpL:37.0,196.0')] ).

cnf(437,plain,
    ( ~ equal(u,succ(v))
    | in(v,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[158,148]),
    [iquote('0:Res:158.0,148.0')] ).

cnf(665,plain,
    ~ equal(succ(skc12),succ(skc12)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[437,65]),
    [iquote('1:Res:437.1,65.0')] ).

cnf(694,plain,
    $false,
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[665]),
    [iquote('1:Obv:665.0')] ).

cnf(695,plain,
    ~ equal(skc13,skc12),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(sa)])],[694,61]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:694.0,47.0,61.0')] ).

cnf(696,plain,
    ( in(skc12,skc13)
    | in(skc12,succ(skc13)) ),
    inference(spt,[spt(split,[position(s2)])],[47]),
    [iquote('1:Spt:694.0,47.1,47.2')] ).

cnf(697,plain,
    in(skc12,succ(skc13)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[696,304]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:696.0,304.0')] ).

cnf(698,plain,
    ~ in(skc12,skc13),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[43,304]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:43.1,304.1')] ).

cnf(1815,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,succ(v))
    | in(u,v)
    | equal(u,v) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[396,135]),
    [iquote('0:Res:396.1,135.0')] ).

cnf(13496,plain,
    ( in(skc12,skc13)
    | equal(skc13,skc12) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[697,1815]),
    [iquote('1:Res:697.0,1815.0')] ).

cnf(13511,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[13496,698,695]),
    [iquote('1:MRR:13496.0,13496.1,698.0,695.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : NUM386+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Jul  7 06:44:44 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.73/3.90  
% 3.73/3.90  SPASS V 3.9 
% 3.73/3.90  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 3.73/3.90  % SZS status Theorem
% 3.73/3.90  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 3.73/3.90  SPASS derived 11495 clauses, backtracked 22 clauses, performed 3 splits and kept 3215 clauses.
% 3.73/3.90  SPASS allocated 107763 KBytes.
% 3.73/3.90  SPASS spent	0:00:03.46 on the problem.
% 3.73/3.90  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 3.73/3.90  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 3.73/3.90  		0:00:00.16 for inferences.
% 3.73/3.90  		0:00:00.07 for the backtracking.
% 3.73/3.90  		0:00:03.11 for the reduction.
% 3.73/3.90  
% 3.73/3.90  
% 3.73/3.90  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 40 :
% 3.73/3.90  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 3.73/3.90  Formulae used in the proof : existence_m1_subset_1 d1_ordinal1 t7_boole t13_ordinal1 t2_subset d1_tarski t1_boole d2_xboole_0
% 3.73/3.90  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------