TSTP Solution File: NUM385+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : NUM385+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:25:48 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 4.47s 4.67s
% Output   : Refutation 4.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   22 (   8 unt;   8 nHn;  22 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   48 (   0 equ;  22 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(29,axiom,
    ~ equal(skc13,skc12),
    file('NUM385+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(32,axiom,
    in(u,succ(u)),
    file('NUM385+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(33,axiom,
    equal(succ(skc13),succ(skc12)),
    file('NUM385+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(40,axiom,
    equal(set_union2(u,singleton(u)),succ(u)),
    file('NUM385+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(45,axiom,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | ~ in(v,u) ),
    file('NUM385+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(51,axiom,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | ~ equal(v,singleton(w))
    | equal(u,w) ),
    file('NUM385+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(58,axiom,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | ~ equal(v,set_union2(w,x))
    | in(u,x)
    | in(u,w) ),
    file('NUM385+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(64,plain,
    ( ~ equal(u,singleton(skc13))
    | ~ in(skc12,u) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[51,29]),
    [iquote('0:Res:51.2,29.0')] ).

cnf(67,plain,
    in(skc13,succ(skc12)),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[33,32]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:33.0,32.0')] ).

cnf(143,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,singleton(v))
    | equal(u,v) ),
    inference(eqr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[51]),
    [iquote('0:EqR:51.1')] ).

cnf(258,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,set_union2(v,w))
    | in(u,w)
    | in(u,v) ),
    inference(eqr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[58]),
    [iquote('0:EqR:58.1')] ).

cnf(261,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | ~ equal(v,succ(w))
    | in(u,singleton(w))
    | in(u,w) ),
    inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[40,58]),
    [iquote('0:SpL:40.0,58.1')] ).

cnf(380,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,succ(v))
    | in(u,singleton(v))
    | in(u,v) ),
    inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[40,258]),
    [iquote('0:SpL:40.0,258.0')] ).

cnf(498,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,v)
    | ~ equal(v,succ(skc12))
    | in(u,singleton(skc13))
    | in(u,skc13) ),
    inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[33,261]),
    [iquote('0:SpL:33.0,261.1')] ).

cnf(2199,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,succ(v))
    | in(u,v)
    | equal(u,v) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[380,143]),
    [iquote('0:Res:380.1,143.0')] ).

cnf(3055,plain,
    ( ~ in(u,succ(skc12))
    | in(u,singleton(skc13))
    | in(u,skc13) ),
    inference(eqr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[498]),
    [iquote('0:EqR:498.1')] ).

cnf(14401,plain,
    ( in(skc13,skc12)
    | equal(skc13,skc12) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[67,2199]),
    [iquote('0:Res:67.0,2199.0')] ).

cnf(14508,plain,
    in(skc13,skc12),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[14401,29]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:14401.1,29.0')] ).

cnf(14539,plain,
    ~ in(skc12,skc13),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[14508,45]),
    [iquote('0:Res:14508.0,45.0')] ).

cnf(14606,plain,
    ( ~ in(skc12,succ(skc12))
    | ~ equal(singleton(skc13),singleton(skc13))
    | in(skc12,skc13) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[3055,64]),
    [iquote('0:Res:3055.1,64.1')] ).

cnf(14760,plain,
    ( ~ in(skc12,succ(skc12))
    | in(skc12,skc13) ),
    inference(obv,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[14606]),
    [iquote('0:Obv:14606.1')] ).

cnf(14761,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[14760,32,14539]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:14760.0,14760.1,32.0,14539.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : NUM385+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 03:30:42 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 4.47/4.67  
% 4.47/4.67  SPASS V 3.9 
% 4.47/4.67  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 4.47/4.67  % SZS status Theorem
% 4.47/4.67  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 4.47/4.67  SPASS derived 12935 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 3703 clauses.
% 4.47/4.67  SPASS allocated 108724 KBytes.
% 4.47/4.67  SPASS spent	0:00:04.18 on the problem.
% 4.47/4.67  		0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 4.47/4.67  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 4.47/4.67  		0:00:00.20 for inferences.
% 4.47/4.67  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 4.47/4.67  		0:00:03.85 for the reduction.
% 4.47/4.67  
% 4.47/4.67  
% 4.47/4.67  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 22 :
% 4.47/4.67  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 4.47/4.67  Formulae used in the proof : t12_ordinal1 t10_ordinal1 d1_ordinal1 antisymmetry_r2_hidden d1_tarski t1_boole d2_xboole_0
% 4.47/4.67  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------