TSTP Solution File: NUM343+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : NUM343+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:24:22 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 8.58s 2.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 8.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 4 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 8 ( 2 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_13,plain,
( X1 != X2
| ~ less(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z10axwc4/input.p',i_0_13) ).
cnf(i_0_162,negated_conjecture,
less(nn1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-z10axwc4/input.p',i_0_162) ).
cnf(c_0_165,plain,
( X1 != X2
| ~ less(X2,X1) ),
i_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_166,plain,
~ less(X1,X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_165]) ).
cnf(c_0_167,negated_conjecture,
less(nn1,X1),
i_0_162 ).
cnf(c_0_168,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_166,c_0_167]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : NUM343+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jul 6 06:39:39 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.20/0.47 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.20/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.20/0.47 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 8.58/2.58 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 8.58/2.58 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 8.58/2.58 # Preprocessing time : 0.011 s
% 8.58/2.58
% 8.58/2.58 # Proof found!
% 8.58/2.58 # SZS status Theorem
% 8.58/2.58 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 8.58/2.58 # Proof object total steps : 6
% 8.58/2.58 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 8.58/2.58 # Proof object formula steps : 2
% 8.58/2.58 # Proof object conjectures : 3
% 8.58/2.58 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 8.58/2.58 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 8.58/2.58 # Proof object initial clauses used : 2
% 8.58/2.58 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 8.58/2.58 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 8.58/2.58 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 8.58/2.58 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 8.58/2.58 # Parsed axioms : 165
% 8.58/2.58 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 8.58/2.58 # Initial clauses : 165
% 8.58/2.58 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 8.58/2.58 # Initial clauses in saturation : 165
% 8.58/2.58 # Processed clauses : 169
% 8.58/2.58 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 8.58/2.58 # ...subsumed : 0
% 8.58/2.58 # ...remaining for further processing : 169
% 8.58/2.58 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 8.58/2.58 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 8.58/2.58 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 8.58/2.58 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 8.58/2.58 # Generated clauses : 235
% 8.58/2.58 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 224
% 8.58/2.58 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 8.58/2.58 # Paramodulations : 231
% 8.58/2.58 # Factorizations : 2
% 8.58/2.58 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 8.58/2.58 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 8.58/2.58 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 8.58/2.58 # Current number of processed clauses : 167
% 8.58/2.58 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 133
% 8.58/2.58 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 8.58/2.58 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 8.58/2.58 # Non-unit-clauses : 32
% 8.58/2.58 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 220
% 8.58/2.58 # ...number of literals in the above : 955
% 8.58/2.58 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 8.58/2.58 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 8.58/2.58 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 616
% 8.58/2.58 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 197
% 8.58/2.58 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 8.58/2.58 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 39
% 8.58/2.58 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 8.58/2.58 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 8.58/2.58 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 8.58/2.58 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 8.58/2.58 # Condensation successes : 0
% 8.58/2.58 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9305
% 8.58/2.58
% 8.58/2.58 # -------------------------------------------------
% 8.58/2.58 # User time : 0.011 s
% 8.58/2.58 # System time : 0.005 s
% 8.58/2.58 # Total time : 0.016 s
% 8.58/2.58 # ...preprocessing : 0.011 s
% 8.58/2.58 # ...main loop : 0.005 s
% 8.58/2.58 # Maximum resident set size: 7136 pages
% 8.58/2.58
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------