TSTP Solution File: NUM335+1 by SInE---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : NUM335+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : n119.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz
% Memory : 32218.625MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jan 8 15:02:09 EST 2018
% Result : Theorem 0.33s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 44 ( 17 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 101 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 103 ( 46 ~; 41 |; 10 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 5 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 90 ( 0 sgn 56 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(2,axiom,
rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n2),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_4',rdn_digit_add_n3_n2_n5_n0) ).
fof(47,axiom,
! [X1,X14,X15,X13] :
( ( sum(X1,X14,X13)
& sum(X1,X15,X13) )
=> equal(X14,X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_4',unique_RHS) ).
fof(54,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X13,X16,X17,X18] :
( ( rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X16))
& rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X17))
& rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X16,X17,X18)
& rdn_translate(X13,rdn_pos(X18)) )
=> sum(X1,X2,X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_4',sum_entry_point_pos_pos) ).
fof(65,axiom,
rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_4',rdn5) ).
fof(70,axiom,
rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_4',rdn2) ).
fof(71,axiom,
rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_4',rdn3) ).
fof(130,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X13] :
( sum(X2,X13,X1)
<=> difference(X1,X2,X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_4',minus_entry_point) ).
fof(132,axiom,
! [X5,X6,X8,X9,X20] :
( ( rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X6),rdnn(X8),rdnn(X20),rdnn(n0))
& rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X20),rdnn(X5),rdnn(X9),rdnn(n0)) )
=> rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X5),rdnn(X6),rdnn(X8),rdnn(X9)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_4',add_digit_digit_digit) ).
fof(141,axiom,
rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_4',rdn_digit_add_n5_n0_n5_n0) ).
fof(150,conjecture,
! [X1] :
( difference(n5,n3,X1)
=> equal(X1,n2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_4',diff_n5_n3_only_n2) ).
fof(151,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X1] :
( difference(n5,n3,X1)
=> equal(X1,n2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[150]) ).
cnf(153,plain,
rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n2),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
fof(206,plain,
! [X1,X14,X15,X13] :
( ~ sum(X1,X14,X13)
| ~ sum(X1,X15,X13)
| equal(X14,X15) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[47]) ).
fof(207,plain,
! [X16,X17,X18,X19] :
( ~ sum(X16,X17,X19)
| ~ sum(X16,X18,X19)
| equal(X17,X18) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[206]) ).
cnf(208,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ sum(X3,X2,X4)
| ~ sum(X3,X1,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[207]) ).
fof(215,plain,
! [X1,X2,X13,X16,X17,X18] :
( ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X16))
| ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X17))
| ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X16,X17,X18)
| ~ rdn_translate(X13,rdn_pos(X18))
| sum(X1,X2,X13) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[54]) ).
fof(216,plain,
! [X19,X20,X21,X22,X23,X24] :
( ~ rdn_translate(X19,rdn_pos(X22))
| ~ rdn_translate(X20,rdn_pos(X23))
| ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X22,X23,X24)
| ~ rdn_translate(X21,rdn_pos(X24))
| sum(X19,X20,X21) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[215]) ).
cnf(217,plain,
( sum(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X4))
| ~ rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),X5,X6,X4)
| ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X6))
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X5)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[216]) ).
cnf(228,plain,
rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[65]) ).
cnf(233,plain,
rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[70]) ).
cnf(234,plain,
rdn_translate(n3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[71]) ).
fof(313,plain,
! [X1,X2,X13] :
( ( ~ sum(X2,X13,X1)
| difference(X1,X2,X13) )
& ( ~ difference(X1,X2,X13)
| sum(X2,X13,X1) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[130]) ).
fof(314,plain,
! [X14,X15,X16] :
( ( ~ sum(X15,X16,X14)
| difference(X14,X15,X16) )
& ( ~ difference(X14,X15,X16)
| sum(X15,X16,X14) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[313]) ).
cnf(315,plain,
( sum(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ difference(X3,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[314]) ).
fof(320,plain,
! [X5,X6,X8,X9,X20] :
( ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X6),rdnn(X8),rdnn(X20),rdnn(n0))
| ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X20),rdnn(X5),rdnn(X9),rdnn(n0))
| rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X5),rdnn(X6),rdnn(X8),rdnn(X9)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[132]) ).
fof(321,plain,
! [X21,X22,X23,X24,X25] :
( ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X25),rdnn(n0))
| ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X25),rdnn(X21),rdnn(X24),rdnn(n0))
| rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X21),rdnn(X22),rdnn(X23),rdnn(X24)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[320]) ).
cnf(322,plain,
( rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3),rdnn(X4))
| ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X5),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X4),rdnn(n0))
| ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3),rdnn(X5),rdnn(n0)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[321]) ).
cnf(333,plain,
rdn_digit_add(rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[141]) ).
fof(344,negated_conjecture,
? [X1] :
( difference(n5,n3,X1)
& ~ equal(X1,n2) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[151]) ).
fof(345,negated_conjecture,
? [X2] :
( difference(n5,n3,X2)
& ~ equal(X2,n2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[344]) ).
fof(346,negated_conjecture,
( difference(n5,n3,esk1_0)
& ~ equal(esk1_0,n2) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[345]) ).
cnf(347,negated_conjecture,
esk1_0 != n2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[346]) ).
cnf(348,negated_conjecture,
difference(n5,n3,esk1_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[346]) ).
cnf(349,negated_conjecture,
sum(n3,esk1_0,n5),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[315,348,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(385,plain,
( rdn_add_with_carry(rdnn(n0),rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n5))
| ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[322,333,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(538,negated_conjecture,
( X1 = esk1_0
| ~ sum(n3,X1,n5) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[208,349,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(583,plain,
( sum(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5)))
| ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(X4)))
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(X5)))
| ~ rdn_digit_add(rdnn(X5),rdnn(X4),rdnn(n5),rdnn(n0)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[217,385,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1432,plain,
( sum(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5)))
| ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2)))
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[583,153,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1438,plain,
( sum(X1,X2,n5)
| ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2)))
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[1432,228,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1439,plain,
( sum(X1,n2,n5)
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n3))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[1438,233,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1440,plain,
sum(n3,n2,n5),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[1439,234,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1444,negated_conjecture,
n2 = esk1_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[538,1440,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1445,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[1444,347,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(1446,negated_conjecture,
$false,
1445,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : NUM335+1 : TPTP v7.0.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% 0.02/0.26 % Computer : n119.star.cs.uiowa.edu
% 0.02/0.26 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.26 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz
% 0.02/0.26 % Memory : 32218.625MB
% 0.02/0.26 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.2.2.el7.x86_64
% 0.02/0.26 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.26 % DateTime : Fri Jan 5 01:13:15 CST 2018
% 0.02/0.26 % CPUTime :
% 0.06/0.30 % SZS status Started for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.06/0.30 --creating new selector for [NUM005+0.ax, NUM005+1.ax, NUM005+2.ax]
% 0.06/0.45 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_1 with time limit 29
% 0.06/0.45 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=29', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_1']
% 0.06/0.45 -prover status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.06/0.45 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_2 with time limit 89
% 0.06/0.45 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=89', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_2']
% 0.06/0.45 -prover status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.06/0.45 --creating new selector for [NUM005+0.ax, NUM005+1.ax, NUM005+2.ax]
% 0.06/0.51 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_3 with time limit 119
% 0.06/0.51 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=119', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_3']
% 0.06/0.51 -prover status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.06/0.51 --creating new selector for [NUM005+0.ax, NUM005+1.ax, NUM005+2.ax]
% 0.33/0.65 -running prover on /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_4 with time limit 149
% 0.33/0.65 -running prover with command ['/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/Source/./Source/PROVER/eproof.working', '-s', '-tLPO4', '-xAuto', '-tAuto', '--memory-limit=768', '--tptp3-format', '--cpu-limit=149', '/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmpvFh4_r/sel_theBenchmark.p_4']
% 0.33/0.65 -prover status Theorem
% 0.33/0.65 Problem theBenchmark.p solved in phase 3.
% 0.33/0.65 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/0.65 % SZS status Ended for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/0.65 Solved 1 out of 1.
% 0.33/0.65 # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% 0.33/0.65 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.33/0.65 # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% 0.33/0.65 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------