TSTP Solution File: NUM326+1 by PyRes---1.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.3
% Problem  : NUM326+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 13:35:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 102.02s 102.28s
% Output   : Refutation 102.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : NUM326+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 09:50:13 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 102.02/102.28  # Version:  1.3
% 102.02/102.28  # SZS status Theorem
% 102.02/102.28  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 102.02/102.28  fof(sum_what_nn5_n0,conjecture,(?[X]:sum(X,nn5,n0)),input).
% 102.02/102.28  fof(c14,negated_conjecture,(~(?[X]:sum(X,nn5,n0))),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[sum_what_nn5_n0])).
% 102.02/102.28  fof(c15,negated_conjecture,(![X]:~sum(X,nn5,n0)),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[c14])).
% 102.02/102.28  fof(c16,negated_conjecture,(![X2]:~sum(X2,nn5,n0)),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c15])).
% 102.02/102.28  cnf(c17,negated_conjecture,~sum(X138,nn5,n0),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c16])).
% 102.02/102.28  fof(rdn5,axiom,rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),input).
% 102.02/102.28  cnf(c511,axiom,rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[rdn5])).
% 102.02/102.28  fof(rdnn5,axiom,rdn_translate(nn5,rdn_neg(rdnn(n5))),input).
% 102.02/102.28  cnf(c384,axiom,rdn_translate(nn5,rdn_neg(rdnn(n5))),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[rdnn5])).
% 102.02/102.28  fof(sum_entry_point_posx_negx,axiom,(![POS_X]:(![NEG_X]:(![RDN_X]:((rdn_translate(POS_X,rdn_pos(RDN_X))&rdn_translate(NEG_X,rdn_neg(RDN_X)))=>sum(POS_X,NEG_X,n0))))),input).
% 102.02/102.28  fof(c165,axiom,(![POS_X]:(![NEG_X]:(![RDN_X]:((~rdn_translate(POS_X,rdn_pos(RDN_X))|~rdn_translate(NEG_X,rdn_neg(RDN_X)))|sum(POS_X,NEG_X,n0))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[sum_entry_point_posx_negx])).
% 102.02/102.28  fof(c166,axiom,(![POS_X]:(![NEG_X]:((![RDN_X]:(~rdn_translate(POS_X,rdn_pos(RDN_X))|~rdn_translate(NEG_X,rdn_neg(RDN_X))))|sum(POS_X,NEG_X,n0)))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[c165])).
% 102.02/102.28  fof(c168,axiom,(![X65]:(![X66]:(![X67]:((~rdn_translate(X65,rdn_pos(X67))|~rdn_translate(X66,rdn_neg(X67)))|sum(X65,X66,n0))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c167,axiom,(![X65]:(![X66]:((![X67]:(~rdn_translate(X65,rdn_pos(X67))|~rdn_translate(X66,rdn_neg(X67))))|sum(X65,X66,n0)))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c166])).])).
% 102.02/102.28  cnf(c169,axiom,~rdn_translate(X406,rdn_pos(X408))|~rdn_translate(X407,rdn_neg(X408))|sum(X406,X407,n0),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c168])).
% 102.02/102.28  cnf(c1786,plain,~rdn_translate(X2403,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5)))|sum(X2403,nn5,n0),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c169, c384])).
% 102.02/102.28  cnf(c27018,plain,sum(n5,nn5,n0),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c1786, c511])).
% 102.02/102.28  cnf(c27684,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c27018, c17])).
% 102.02/102.28  # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 102.02/102.28  
% 102.02/102.28  # Initial clauses    : 424
% 102.02/102.28  # Processed clauses  : 4915
% 102.02/102.28  # Factors computed   : 33
% 102.02/102.28  # Resolvents computed: 27135
% 102.02/102.28  # Tautologies deleted: 7
% 102.02/102.28  # Forward subsumed   : 1585
% 102.02/102.28  # Backward subsumed  : 3
% 102.02/102.28  # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 102.02/102.28  # User time          : 101.823 s
% 102.02/102.28  # System time        : 0.085 s
% 102.02/102.28  # Total time         : 101.908 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------