TSTP Solution File: NUM318+1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : NUM318+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May 5 08:09:18 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.62s 0.79s
% Output : Refutation 0.62s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 10 unt; 1 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 78 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 23 ( 12 ~; 7 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 51 ( 51 fml; 0 var)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 2 ( 1 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 10 ( 9 usr; 4 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 17 ( 16 !; 0 ?; 5 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_11,type,
sQ0_eqProxy:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * X0 ) > $o ) ).
tff(f521,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f520,f511]) ).
tff(f511,plain,
rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
tff(f6,axiom,
rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ciP3ozKYOR/Vampire---4.8_11365',rdn5) ).
tff(f520,plain,
~ rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),
inference(resolution,[],[f519,f512]) ).
tff(f512,plain,
rdn_translate(nn5,rdn_neg(rdnn(n5))),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f133]) ).
tff(f133,axiom,
rdn_translate(nn5,rdn_neg(rdnn(n5))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ciP3ozKYOR/Vampire---4.8_11365',rdnn5) ).
tff(f519,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ rdn_translate(nn5,rdn_neg(X0))
| ~ rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(X0)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f510,f504]) ).
tff(f504,plain,
~ sum(n5,nn5,n0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f404]) ).
tff(f404,plain,
~ sum(n5,nn5,n0),
inference(flattening,[],[f403]) ).
tff(f403,negated_conjecture,
~ sum(n5,nn5,n0),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f402]) ).
tff(f402,conjecture,
sum(n5,nn5,n0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ciP3ozKYOR/Vampire---4.8_11365',sum_n5_nn5_n0) ).
tff(f510,plain,
! [X2: $i,X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( sum(X0,X1,n0)
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X2))
| ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_pos(X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f503]) ).
tff(f503,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( sum(X0,X1,n0)
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X2))
| ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_pos(X2)) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f502]) ).
tff(f502,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( sum(X0,X1,n0)
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X2))
| ~ rdn_translate(X0,rdn_pos(X2)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f409]) ).
tff(f409,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X2))
& rdn_translate(X0,rdn_pos(X2)) )
=> sum(X0,X1,n0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f291]) ).
tff(f291,axiom,
! [X12,X13,X9] :
( ( rdn_translate(X13,rdn_neg(X9))
& rdn_translate(X12,rdn_pos(X9)) )
=> sum(X12,X13,n0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ciP3ozKYOR/Vampire---4.8_11365',sum_entry_point_posx_negx) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.15 % Problem : NUM318+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.17 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.17/0.39 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.39 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.39 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.39 % DateTime : Fri May 3 15:07:08 EDT 2024
% 0.17/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.39 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.17/0.39 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.ciP3ozKYOR/Vampire---4.8_11365
% 0.62/0.78 % (11481)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.62/0.78 % (11474)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.78 % (11479)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.62/0.78 % (11478)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.62/0.79 % (11474)First to succeed.
% 0.62/0.79 % (11480)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.62/0.79 % (11475)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.62/0.79 % (11479)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.79 % (11474)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-11473"
% 0.62/0.79 % (11481)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.62/0.79 % (11474)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.62/0.79 % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.62/0.79 % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.62/0.79 % (11474)------------------------------
% 0.62/0.79 % (11474)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.62/0.79 % (11474)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.62/0.79
% 0.62/0.79 % (11474)Memory used [KB]: 1281
% 0.62/0.79 % (11474)Time elapsed: 0.005 s
% 0.62/0.79 % (11474)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.62/0.79 % (11473)Success in time 0.392 s
% 0.62/0.79 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------