TSTP Solution File: NUM318+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : NUM318+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:31:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 8 ~; 5 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(sum_n5_nn5_n0,conjecture,
sum(n5,nn5,n0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',sum_n5_nn5_n0) ).
fof(sum_entry_point_posx_negx,axiom,
! [X13,X14,X10] :
( ( rdn_translate(X13,rdn_pos(X10))
& rdn_translate(X14,rdn_neg(X10)) )
=> sum(X13,X14,n0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+2.ax',sum_entry_point_posx_negx) ).
fof(rdnn5,axiom,
rdn_translate(nn5,rdn_neg(rdnn(n5))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdnn5) ).
fof(rdn5,axiom,
rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdn5) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ sum(n5,nn5,n0),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[sum_n5_nn5_n0]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X15,X16,X17] :
( ~ rdn_translate(X15,rdn_pos(X17))
| ~ rdn_translate(X16,rdn_neg(X17))
| sum(X15,X16,n0) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sum_entry_point_posx_negx])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ sum(n5,nn5,n0),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( sum(X1,X2,n0)
| ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_neg(X3))
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(X3)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
rdn_translate(nn5,rdn_neg(rdnn(n5))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdnn5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ sum(n5,nn5,n0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( sum(X1,nn5,n0)
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
rdn_translate(n5,rdn_pos(rdnn(n5))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : NUM318+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jul 7 06:47:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.41 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.41 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.41 # Preprocessing time : 0.022 s
% 0.24/1.41
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.41 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.41 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.24/1.41 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.24/1.41 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.41 # Parsed axioms : 402
% 0.24/1.41 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 301
% 0.24/1.41 # Initial clauses : 101
% 0.24/1.41 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Initial clauses in saturation : 101
% 0.24/1.41 # Processed clauses : 102
% 0.24/1.41 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # ...remaining for further processing : 102
% 0.24/1.41 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Generated clauses : 61
% 0.24/1.41 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 57
% 0.24/1.41 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Paramodulations : 61
% 0.24/1.41 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of processed clauses : 102
% 0.24/1.41 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 86
% 0.24/1.41 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/1.41 # Non-unit-clauses : 15
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 56
% 0.24/1.41 # ...number of literals in the above : 120
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17
% 0.24/1.41 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.24/1.41 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.41 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9397
% 0.24/1.41
% 0.24/1.41 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.41 # User time : 0.021 s
% 0.24/1.41 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.24/1.41 # Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.24/1.41 # Maximum resident set size: 4252 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------