TSTP Solution File: NUM298+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : NUM298+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 08:24:08 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.16s 2.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 0 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_7,plain,
( less(X1,X2)
| ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X3))
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3q8k11n7/input.p',i_0_7) ).
cnf(i_0_21,plain,
rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3q8k11n7/input.p',i_0_21) ).
cnf(i_0_14,plain,
( ~ less(X1,X2)
| ~ less(X2,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3q8k11n7/input.p',i_0_14) ).
cnf(i_0_18,negated_conjecture,
less(n2,nn2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3q8k11n7/input.p',i_0_18) ).
cnf(i_0_139,plain,
rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-3q8k11n7/input.p',i_0_139) ).
cnf(c_0_145,plain,
( less(X1,X2)
| ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X3))
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X4)) ),
i_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_146,plain,
rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
i_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_147,plain,
( ~ less(X1,X2)
| ~ less(X2,X1) ),
i_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_148,negated_conjecture,
less(n2,nn2),
i_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_149,plain,
( less(X1,n2)
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_145,c_0_146]) ).
cnf(c_0_150,plain,
rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
i_0_139 ).
cnf(c_0_151,negated_conjecture,
~ less(nn2,n2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_147,c_0_148]) ).
cnf(c_0_152,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_149,c_0_150]),c_0_151]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : NUM298+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jul 8 01:44:00 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.18/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.18/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.16/2.36 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 7.16/2.36 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.16/2.36 # Preprocessing time : 0.019 s
% 7.16/2.36
% 7.16/2.36 # Proof found!
% 7.16/2.36 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.16/2.36 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.16/2.36 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 7.16/2.36 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 7.16/2.36 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 7.16/2.36 # Proof object conjectures : 3
% 7.16/2.36 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 7.16/2.36 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 7.16/2.36 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 7.16/2.36 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 7.16/2.36 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 7.16/2.36 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 7.16/2.36 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.16/2.36 # Parsed axioms : 162
% 7.16/2.36 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.16/2.36 # Initial clauses : 162
% 7.16/2.36 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.16/2.36 # Initial clauses in saturation : 162
% 7.16/2.36 # Processed clauses : 166
% 7.16/2.36 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 7.16/2.36 # ...subsumed : 0
% 7.16/2.36 # ...remaining for further processing : 166
% 7.16/2.36 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 7.16/2.36 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.16/2.36 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 7.16/2.36 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 7.16/2.36 # Generated clauses : 220
% 7.16/2.36 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 211
% 7.16/2.36 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 7.16/2.36 # Paramodulations : 216
% 7.16/2.36 # Factorizations : 2
% 7.16/2.36 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 7.16/2.36 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.16/2.36 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.16/2.36 # Current number of processed clauses : 164
% 7.16/2.36 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 131
% 7.16/2.36 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.16/2.36 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 7.16/2.36 # Non-unit-clauses : 31
% 7.16/2.36 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 207
% 7.16/2.36 # ...number of literals in the above : 932
% 7.16/2.36 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.16/2.36 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 7.16/2.36 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 624
% 7.16/2.36 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 187
% 7.16/2.36 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 7.16/2.36 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 65
% 7.16/2.36 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.16/2.36 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 7.16/2.36 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 7.16/2.36 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.16/2.36 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.16/2.36 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9077
% 7.16/2.36
% 7.16/2.36 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.16/2.36 # User time : 0.021 s
% 7.16/2.36 # System time : 0.006 s
% 7.16/2.36 # Total time : 0.027 s
% 7.16/2.36 # ...preprocessing : 0.019 s
% 7.16/2.36 # ...main loop : 0.008 s
% 7.16/2.36 # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 7.16/2.36
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------