TSTP Solution File: NUM298+1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : NUM298+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:46:17 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 17 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 35 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 17 ~; 10 |; 5 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 3 sgn; 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(less_property,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( less(X1,X2)
<=> ( ~ less(X2,X1)
& X2 != X1 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9y4S931sb5/E---3.1_17147.p',less_property) ).
fof(less_entry_point_neg_pos,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X10,X11] :
( ( rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X10))
& rdn_translate(X2,rdn_pos(X11)) )
=> less(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9y4S931sb5/E---3.1_17147.p',less_entry_point_neg_pos) ).
fof(n2_not_less_nn2,conjecture,
~ less(n2,nn2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9y4S931sb5/E---3.1_17147.p',n2_not_less_nn2) ).
fof(rdn2,axiom,
rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9y4S931sb5/E---3.1_17147.p',rdn2) ).
fof(rdnn2,axiom,
rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9y4S931sb5/E---3.1_17147.p',rdnn2) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X1,X2] :
( less(X1,X2)
<=> ( ~ less(X2,X1)
& X2 != X1 ) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[less_property]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X37,X38,X39,X40] :
( ~ rdn_translate(X37,rdn_neg(X39))
| ~ rdn_translate(X38,rdn_pos(X40))
| less(X37,X38) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[less_entry_point_neg_pos])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X45,X46] :
( ( ~ less(X46,X45)
| ~ less(X45,X46) )
& ( X46 != X45
| ~ less(X45,X46) )
& ( less(X46,X45)
| X46 = X45
| less(X45,X46) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
less(n2,nn2),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[n2_not_less_nn2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( less(X1,X3)
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X2))
| ~ rdn_translate(X3,rdn_pos(X4)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
rdn_translate(n2,rdn_pos(rdnn(n2))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn2]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ less(X1,X2)
| ~ less(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
less(n2,nn2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( less(X1,n2)
| ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdnn2]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ less(nn2,n2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : NUM298+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 15:21:59 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9y4S931sb5/E---3.1_17147.p
% 0.17/0.47 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # new_bool_1 with pid 17296 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.17/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.47 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 325s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 61s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with pid 17300 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v
% 0.17/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.47 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2v with 325s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.47
% 0.17/0.47 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.47 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 402
% 0.17/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 275
% 0.17/0.47 # Initial clauses : 129
% 0.17/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 129
% 0.17/0.47 # Processed clauses : 161
% 0.17/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 161
% 0.17/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.17/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Generated clauses : 19
% 0.17/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 12
% 0.17/0.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Paramodulations : 16
% 0.17/0.47 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.17/0.47 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.17/0.47 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 31
% 0.17/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 25
% 0.17/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.17/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.17/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 109
% 0.17/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 127
% 0.17/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 129
% 0.17/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 28
% 0.17/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21
% 0.17/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.17/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8272
% 0.17/0.47
% 0.17/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.47 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.17/0.47 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.47 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.17/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 2700 pages
% 0.17/0.47
% 0.17/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.47 # User time : 0.022 s
% 0.17/0.47 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.17/0.47 # Total time : 0.028 s
% 0.17/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 2032 pages
% 0.17/0.47 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.17/0.47 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------