TSTP Solution File: NUM297+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : NUM297+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 09:31:29 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   40 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   35 (  17   ~;  13   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn  14   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(less_entry_point_neg_neg,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X10,X11] :
      ( ( rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X10))
        & rdn_translate(X2,rdn_neg(X11))
        & rdn_positive_less(X11,X10) )
     => less(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',less_entry_point_neg_neg) ).

fof(nn4_less_nn2,conjecture,
    less(nn4,nn2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',nn4_less_nn2) ).

fof(rdnn2,axiom,
    rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdnn2) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less_transitivity,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2))
        & rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X2),rdnn(X3)) )
     => rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less_transitivity) ).

fof(rdnn4,axiom,
    rdn_translate(nn4,rdn_neg(rdnn(n4))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+0.ax',rdnn4) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less34,axiom,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less34) ).

fof(rdn_positive_less23,axiom,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM005+1.ax',rdn_positive_less23) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X12,X13,X14,X15] :
      ( ~ rdn_translate(X12,rdn_neg(X14))
      | ~ rdn_translate(X13,rdn_neg(X15))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(X15,X14)
      | less(X12,X13) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[less_entry_point_neg_neg])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less(nn4,nn2),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[nn4_less_nn2]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( less(X1,X2)
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(X3,X4)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X2,rdn_neg(X3))
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X4)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    rdn_translate(nn2,rdn_neg(rdnn(n2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdnn2]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less(nn4,nn2),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X4),rdnn(X5))
      | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X5),rdnn(X6))
      | rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X4),rdnn(X6)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less_transitivity])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( less(X1,nn2)
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),X2)
    | ~ rdn_translate(X1,rdn_neg(X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    rdn_translate(nn4,rdn_neg(rdnn(n4))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdnn4]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less(nn4,nn2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X2))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X3),rdnn(X2))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n3),rdnn(n4)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less34]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n4)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(n4))
    | ~ rdn_positive_less(rdnn(X1),rdnn(n3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    rdn_positive_less(rdnn(n2),rdnn(n3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[rdn_positive_less23]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : NUM297+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jul  8 00:19:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.41  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.021 s
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object total steps             : 22
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause steps            : 11
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 7
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 0.23/1.41  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 0.23/1.41  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 402
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 301
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses                      : 103
% 0.23/1.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 103
% 0.23/1.41  # Processed clauses                    : 201
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # ...subsumed                          : 23
% 0.23/1.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 178
% 0.23/1.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.23/1.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # Generated clauses                    : 144
% 0.23/1.41  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 117
% 0.23/1.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 18
% 0.23/1.41  # Paramodulations                      : 141
% 0.23/1.41  # Factorizations                       : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 175
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 108
% 0.23/1.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 22
% 0.23/1.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 45
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15
% 0.23/1.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 32
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 372
% 0.23/1.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 334
% 0.23/1.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 38
% 0.23/1.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 312
% 0.23/1.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 8638
% 0.23/1.41  
% 0.23/1.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.41  # User time                : 0.020 s
% 0.23/1.41  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Total time               : 0.029 s
% 0.23/1.41  # Maximum resident set size: 4196 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------