TSTP Solution File: NUM285-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : NUM285-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:30:37 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP24359/NUM/NUM285-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ...................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 106] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 346] [nf = 4] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 977] [nf = 10] [nu = 10] [ut = 3]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2635] [nf = 94] [nu = 46] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6770] [nf = 243] [nu = 178] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16981] [nf = 1093] [nu = 412] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 42551] [nf = 2851] [nu = 1527] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 106593] [nf = 10141] [nu = 3261] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 269521] [nf = 26643] [nu = 11912] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 685971] [nf = 83838] [nu = 24855] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1766828] [nf = 221898] [nu = 88156] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 14 secs [nr = 4590300] [nf = 654663] [nu = 188146] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 37 secs [nr = 12057374] [nf = 1749791] [nu = 646000] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 98 secs [nr = 31914784] [nf = 4991831] [nu = 1445971] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 39617269] [nf = 6371844] [nu = 1939246] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 39617367] [nf = 6371844] [nu = 1939250] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 39617623] [nf = 6371848] [nu = 1939258] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 39618289] [nf = 6371856] [nu = 1939276] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 39619949] [nf = 6371940] [nu = 1939312] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 39624084] [nf = 6372089] [nu = 1939444] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 39634295] [nf = 6372939] [nu = 1939678] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 39659865] [nf = 6374697] [nu = 1940793] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 39723907] [nf = 6381987] [nu = 1942527] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 39886835] [nf = 6398489] [nu = 1951178] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 125 secs [nr = 40303285] [nf = 6455684] [nu = 1964121] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 128 secs [nr = 41384142] [nf = 6593744] [nu = 2027422] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 136 secs [nr = 44207614] [nf = 7026509] [nu = 2127412] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 159 secs [nr = 51674688] [nf = 8121637] [nu = 2585266] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 221 secs [nr = 71532098] [nf = 11363677] [nu = 3385237] [ut = 4]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 112890848
% resolvents: 97741154 factors: 15149694
% Number of unit clauses generated: 4884554
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 4.33
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2 [4] = 1 [5] = 1
% Total = 4
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 4884554 [2] = 45277984 [3] = 62728310
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] a0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] a1 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] a2 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] a3 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] a4 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] a5 (+)1 (-)0
% [6] b0 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] b1 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] b2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] b3 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] b4 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] b5 (+)1 (-)0
% [12] p1 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] p2 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] p3 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] p4 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] p5 (+)1 (-)0
% [17] q1 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] q2 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] q3 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] q4 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] q5 (+)1 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)4 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 4
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 533227616
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 79174237
% Number of successful unifications: 112890848
% Number of unification failures: 0
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 326802300
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1417023540
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 3102404
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 2
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 56
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 112890848
% ConstructUnitClause() = 3102406
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 2.71 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 376303
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------