TSTP Solution File: NUM183-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : NUM183-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:06:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.76s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   11 (   8 unt;   1 nHn;   9 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   17 (   1 equ;   7 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    9 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( ~ subclass(X,Y)
    | ~ member(Z,X)
    | member(Z,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(intersection3,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X,Y)
    | ~ member(X,Z)
    | member(X,intersection(Y,Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection3) ).

cnf(complement2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X,universal_class)
    | member(X,complement(Y))
    | member(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement2) ).

cnf(limit_ordinals,axiom,
    intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers) = limit_ordinals,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM004-0.ax',limit_ordinals) ).

cnf(prove_ordinals_are_kind_1_or_limit_1,negated_conjecture,
    member(x,ordinal_numbers),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ordinals_are_kind_1_or_limit_1) ).

cnf(prove_ordinals_are_kind_1_or_limit_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(x,kind_1_ordinals),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ordinals_are_kind_1_or_limit_2) ).

cnf(prove_ordinals_are_kind_1_or_limit_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(x,limit_ordinals),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ordinals_are_kind_1_or_limit_3) ).

cnf(238,plain,
    member(x,universal_class),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[subclass_members,class_elements_are_sets,prove_ordinals_are_kind_1_or_limit_1]) ).

cnf(496,plain,
    member(x,complement(kind_1_ordinals)),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[complement2,238,prove_ordinals_are_kind_1_or_limit_2]) ).

cnf(1152,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[intersection3,496,prove_ordinals_are_kind_1_or_limit_1]),prove_ordinals_are_kind_1_or_limit_3,limit_ordinals,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : NUM183-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 06:34:29 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-05T06:34:29
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n024.cluster.edu at 2022-07-05T06:34:29
% 0.56/0.76  
% 0.56/0.76  
% 0.56/0.76  #||
% 0.56/0.76  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.56/0.76  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.76  ||#
% 0.56/0.76  
% 0.56/0.76  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.56/0.76  ;      2144 formulas have been input or derived (from 210 formulas).
% 0.56/0.76  ;      1152 (54%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.56/0.76  ;           35 ( 3%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.56/0.76  ;         1117 (97%) are still being kept.
% 0.56/0.76  ; 
% 0.56/0.76  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.031  11%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.004   1%   Assert                       (161 calls)
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.089  32%   Process new row              (1,866 calls)
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.057  20%   Resolution                   (418 calls)
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.006   2%   Paramodulation               (209 calls)
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (4 calls)
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.004   1%   Condensing                   (483 calls)
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.013   5%   Forward subsumption          (483 calls)
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.021   7%   Backward subsumption         (439 calls)
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (368 calls)
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.016   6%   Forward simplification       (1,866 calls)
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.007   2%   Backward simplification      (1,118 calls)
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.004   1%   Ordering                     (923 calls)
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.029  10%   Other
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.281        Total
% 0.56/0.76  ;     0.282        Real time
% 0.56/0.76  ; 
% 0.56/0.76  ; Term-hash-array has 2,523 terms in all.
% 0.56/0.76  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 439 entries (439 at peak, 439 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.56/0.76  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 2,804 nodes (2,804 at peak, 2,804 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.56/0.76  ;  Retrieved 348 possibly forward subsuming rows in 483 calls.
% 0.56/0.76  ;  Retrieved 113 possibly backward subsumed rows in 439 calls.
% 0.56/0.76  ; Path-index has 2,541 entries (2,541 at peak, 2,542 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.56/0.76  ; Path-index has 5,742 nodes (5,742 at peak, 5,743 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.56/0.76  ; Trie-index has 2,541 entries (2,541 at peak, 2,542 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.56/0.76  ; Trie-index has 7,928 nodes (7,928 at peak, 7,929 added, 1 deleted).
% 0.56/0.76  ; Retrieved 1,260 generalization terms in 4,809 calls.
% 0.56/0.76  ; Retrieved 719 instance terms in 681 calls.
% 0.56/0.76  ; Retrieved 60,650 unifiable terms in 3,158 calls.
% 0.56/0.76  ; 
% 0.56/0.76  ; The agenda of rows to process has 90 entries:
% 0.56/0.76  ;     5 with value 12             28 with value 16               2 with value 19
% 0.56/0.76  ;     1 with value 13              1 with value 17               2 with value 20
% 0.56/0.76  ;    24 with value 14              2 with value 18               1 with value 23
% 0.56/0.76  ;    24 with value 15
% 0.56/0.76  ; The agenda of rows to give has 907 entries:
% 0.56/0.76  ;    10 with value (4 8)           8 with value (4 23)           3 with value (4 38)
% 0.56/0.76  ;    44 with value (4 9)           9 with value (4 24)           3 with value (4 39)
% 0.56/0.76  ;    60 with value (4 10)          3 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 41)
% 0.56/0.76  ;    75 with value (4 11)         14 with value (4 26)           3 with value (4 42)
% 0.56/0.76  ;    58 with value (4 12)          5 with value (4 27)           1 with value (4 43)
% 0.56/0.76  ;    55 with value (4 13)          2 with value (4 28)           1 with value (4 44)
% 0.56/0.76  ;   141 with value (4 14)          6 with value (4 29)           2 with value (4 45)
% 0.56/0.76  ;    93 with value (4 15)          3 with value (4 30)           6 with value (4 46)
% 0.56/0.76  ;   107 with value (4 16)          1 with value (4 31)           3 with value (4 49)
% 0.56/0.76  ;    20 with value (4 17)          4 with value (4 32)           1 with value (4 51)
% 0.56/0.76  ;    40 with value (4 18)          4 with value (4 33)           1 with value (4 53)
% 0.56/0.76  ;    53 with value (4 19)          9 with value (4 34)           1 with value (4 55)
% 0.56/0.76  ;    29 with value (4 20)          1 with value (4 35)           1 with value (4 57)
% 0.56/0.76  ;     9 with value (4 21)          1 with value (4 36)           1 with value (4 59)
% 0.56/0.76  ;    11 with value (4 22)          3 with value (4 37)           1 with value (4 63)
% 0.56/0.76  Evaluation took:
% 0.56/0.76    0.282 seconds of real time
% 0.56/0.76    0.259172 seconds of user run time
% 0.56/0.76    0.023308 seconds of system run time
% 0.56/0.76    [Run times include 0.012 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.56/0.76    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.56/0.76    0 page faults and
% 0.56/0.76    18,414,336 bytes consed.
% 0.56/0.76  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.56/0.76  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-05T06:34:30
% 0.56/0.76  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.56/0.76  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------