TSTP Solution File: NUM180-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : NUM180-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 18:03:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.54s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 13 ( 1 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 8 ( 5 ~; 3 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 7 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f279,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f277,f267]) ).
fof(f267,plain,
~ member(not_subclass_element(intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers),ordinal_numbers),ordinal_numbers),
inference(resolution,[],[f3,f258]) ).
fof(f258,plain,
~ subclass(intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers),ordinal_numbers),
inference(backward_demodulation,[],[f159,f139]) ).
fof(f139,axiom,
intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers) = limit_ordinals,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',limit_ordinals) ).
fof(f159,axiom,
~ subclass(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_limit_ordinals_are_ordinals_1) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( subclass(X0,X1)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_subclass_members2) ).
fof(f277,plain,
member(not_subclass_element(intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers),ordinal_numbers),ordinal_numbers),
inference(resolution,[],[f22,f266]) ).
fof(f266,plain,
member(not_subclass_element(intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers),ordinal_numbers),intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers)),
inference(resolution,[],[f2,f258]) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( subclass(X0,X1)
| member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',not_subclass_members1) ).
fof(f22,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X4] :
( ~ member(X4,intersection(X0,X1))
| member(X4,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection2) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.12 % Problem : NUM180-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.02/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.09/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 06:28:30 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.48 % (28861)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.15/0.49 % (28860)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.15/0.50 % (28868)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.15/0.50 % (28861)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.50 % (28861)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.50 % (28861)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.15/0.51 % (28877)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 0.15/0.51 % (28876)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.15/0.52 % (28861)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.15/0.52 % (28861)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.52 % (28861)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.52
% 0.15/0.52 % (28861)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.15/0.52 % (28861)Time elapsed: 0.008 s
% 0.15/0.52 % (28861)Instructions burned: 8 (million)
% 0.15/0.52 % (28861)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.52 % (28861)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.52 % (28869)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.15/0.52 % (28858)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.15/0.52 % (28876)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.52 % (28865)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 0.15/0.53 % (28862)dis+2_1:64_add=large:bce=on:bd=off:i=2:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.54 % (28876)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.54 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.54 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.54 % (28876)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.54 % (28876)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.15/0.54 % (28876)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.15/0.54 % (28876)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.54
% 0.15/0.54 % (28876)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.15/0.54 % (28876)Time elapsed: 0.130 s
% 0.15/0.54 % (28876)Instructions burned: 11 (million)
% 0.15/0.54 % (28876)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.54 % (28876)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.54 % (28853)Success in time 0.198 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------