TSTP Solution File: NUM180-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : NUM180-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:16:41 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.67s 0.91s
% Output   : Refutation 0.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : NUM180-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 05:36:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.37  The process was started by sandbox on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.37  Wed Jul  6 05:36:07 2022
% 0.12/0.37  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 20832.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.37  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.37  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  list(usable).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.37  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.37  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.37  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.37     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.37    Following clause subsumed by 221 during input processing: 0 [copy,221,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.37  221 back subsumes 110.
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.67/0.88  
% 0.67/0.88  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.67/0.88  
% 0.67/0.88  
% 0.67/0.88  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.67/0.88  
% 0.67/0.88  
% 0.67/0.88  
% 0.67/0.88  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.67/0.88  
% 0.67/0.88  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.67/0.88  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.67/0.88  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.67/0.88  number of clauses in intial UL: 88
% 0.67/0.88  number of clauses initially in problem: 197
% 0.67/0.88  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 44
% 0.67/0.88  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 65
% 0.67/0.88  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.67/0.88  absolute distinct symbol count: 79
% 0.67/0.88     distinct predicate count: 17
% 0.67/0.88     distinct function count: 44
% 0.67/0.88     distinct constant count: 18
% 0.67/0.88  
% 0.67/0.88  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.67/0.88  
% 0.67/0.88  
% 0.67/0.88  
% 0.67/0.88  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.67/0.91  
% 0.67/0.91  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.67/0.91  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.67/0.91  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.67/0.91  
% 0.67/0.91  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.52 sec ----> 1992 [binary,1991.1,109.1] {-} $F.
% 0.67/0.91  
% 0.67/0.91  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 0.67/0.91  
% 0.67/0.91  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.67/0.91  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.67/0.91  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.67/0.91  
% 0.67/0.91  2 [] {+} -member(not_subclass_element(A,B),B)|subclass(A,B).
% 0.67/0.91  16 [] {+} -member(A,intersection(B,C))|member(A,C).
% 0.67/0.91  109 [] {+} -subclass(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers).
% 0.67/0.91  119 [] {-} member(not_subclass_element(A,B),A)|subclass(A,B).
% 0.67/0.91  209 [] {-} intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers)=limit_ordinals.
% 0.67/0.91  251 [hyper,119,109] {-} member(not_subclass_element(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers),limit_ordinals).
% 0.67/0.91  1531 [para_from,209.1.1,16.1.2] {-} -member(A,limit_ordinals)|member(A,ordinal_numbers).
% 0.67/0.91  1924 [hyper,1531,251] {-} member(not_subclass_element(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers),ordinal_numbers).
% 0.67/0.91  1991 [hyper,1924,2] {-} subclass(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers).
% 0.67/0.91  1992 [binary,1991.1,109.1] {-} $F.
% 0.67/0.91  
% 0.67/0.91  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.67/0.91  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.67/0.91  
% 0.67/0.91  
% 0.67/0.91  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.67/0.91  
% 0.67/0.91  
% 0.67/0.91  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.67/0.91  
% 0.67/0.91  ============ end of search ============
% 0.67/0.91  
% 0.67/0.91  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.67/0.91  
% 0.67/0.91  Process 20832 finished Wed Jul  6 05:36:07 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------