TSTP Solution File: NUM180-1 by Metis---2.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Metis---2.4
% Problem : NUM180-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 12:24:59 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 30.58s 30.74s
% Output : CNFRefutation 30.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 4 unt; 4 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 2 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 1 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
( member(not_subclass_element(X,Y),X)
| subclass(X,Y) ) ).
cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X,Y),Y)
| subclass(X,Y) ) ).
cnf(intersection2,axiom,
( ~ member(Z,intersection(X,Y))
| member(Z,Y) ) ).
cnf(limit_ordinals,axiom,
intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers) = limit_ordinals ).
cnf(prove_limit_ordinals_are_ordinals_1,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers) ).
cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
( ~ member(not_subclass_element(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers),ordinal_numbers)
| subclass(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers) ),
inference(subst,[],[not_subclass_members2:[bind(X,$fot(limit_ordinals)),bind(Y,$fot(ordinal_numbers))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
( member(not_subclass_element(limit_ordinals,Y),limit_ordinals)
| subclass(limit_ordinals,Y) ),
inference(subst,[],[not_subclass_members1:[bind(X,$fot(limit_ordinals))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
( ~ member(X_1051,intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers))
| member(X_1051,ordinal_numbers) ),
inference(subst,[],[intersection2:[bind(X,$fot(complement(kind_1_ordinals))),bind(Y,$fot(ordinal_numbers)),bind(Z,$fot(X_1051))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
( intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers) != limit_ordinals
| ~ member(X_1051,limit_ordinals)
| member(X_1051,intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers)) ),
introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( ~ member(X_1051,intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers)) ),[1],$fot(limit_ordinals)]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
( ~ member(X_1051,limit_ordinals)
| member(X_1051,intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers)) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers),limit_ordinals) )],[limit_ordinals,refute_0_3]) ).
cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
( ~ member(X_1051,limit_ordinals)
| member(X_1051,ordinal_numbers) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( member(X_1051,intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers)) )],[refute_0_4,refute_0_2]) ).
cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
( ~ member(not_subclass_element(limit_ordinals,Y),limit_ordinals)
| member(not_subclass_element(limit_ordinals,Y),ordinal_numbers) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_5:[bind(X_1051,$fot(not_subclass_element(limit_ordinals,Y)))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
( member(not_subclass_element(limit_ordinals,Y),ordinal_numbers)
| subclass(limit_ordinals,Y) ),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( member(not_subclass_element(limit_ordinals,Y),limit_ordinals) )],[refute_0_1,refute_0_6]) ).
cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
( member(not_subclass_element(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers),ordinal_numbers)
| subclass(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers) ),
inference(subst,[],[refute_0_7:[bind(Y,$fot(ordinal_numbers))]]) ).
cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
subclass(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers),
inference(resolve,[$cnf( member(not_subclass_element(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers),ordinal_numbers) )],[refute_0_8,refute_0_0]) ).
cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
$false,
inference(resolve,[$cnf( subclass(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers) )],[refute_0_9,prove_limit_ordinals_are_ordinals_1]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : NUM180-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jul 6 05:31:03 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.34 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 30.58/30.74 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 30.58/30.74
% 30.58/30.74 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 30.58/30.74
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------