TSTP Solution File: NUM180-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : NUM180-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:46:01 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 13 ( 5 unt; 3 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 21 ( 2 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(intersection2,axiom,
( member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pJUfb9n2EG/E---3.1_1576.p',intersection2) ).
cnf(limit_ordinals,axiom,
intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers) = limit_ordinals,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pJUfb9n2EG/E---3.1_1576.p',limit_ordinals) ).
cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
| subclass(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pJUfb9n2EG/E---3.1_1576.p',not_subclass_members1) ).
cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pJUfb9n2EG/E---3.1_1576.p',not_subclass_members2) ).
cnf(prove_limit_ordinals_are_ordinals_1,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pJUfb9n2EG/E---3.1_1576.p',prove_limit_ordinals_are_ordinals_1) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
( member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
intersection2 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
intersection(complement(kind_1_ordinals),ordinal_numbers) = limit_ordinals,
limit_ordinals ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( member(X1,ordinal_numbers)
| ~ member(X1,limit_ordinals) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
| subclass(X1,X2) ),
not_subclass_members1 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( subclass(X1,X2)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
not_subclass_members2 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( member(not_subclass_element(limit_ordinals,X1),ordinal_numbers)
| subclass(limit_ordinals,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ subclass(limit_ordinals,ordinal_numbers),
prove_limit_ordinals_are_ordinals_1 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11 % Problem : NUM180-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 13:50:50 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.pJUfb9n2EG/E---3.1_1576.p
% 0.16/0.48 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.16/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1656 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.16/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.48 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 313s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1664 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.16/0.48 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.48 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.48 # Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.48 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 313s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.48 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/0.48 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.48
% 0.16/0.48 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.48 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.48 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.48 # Parsed axioms : 159
% 0.16/0.48 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Initial clauses : 159
% 0.16/0.48 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 19
% 0.16/0.48 # Initial clauses in saturation : 140
% 0.16/0.48 # Processed clauses : 245
% 0.16/0.48 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # ...subsumed : 4
% 0.16/0.48 # ...remaining for further processing : 241
% 0.16/0.48 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 8
% 0.16/0.48 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Generated clauses : 122
% 0.16/0.48 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 104
% 0.16/0.48 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Paramodulations : 112
% 0.16/0.48 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.16/0.48 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Equation resolutions : 8
% 0.16/0.48 # Total rewrite steps : 7
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.48 # Current number of processed clauses : 96
% 0.16/0.48 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 24
% 0.16/0.48 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.16/0.48 # Non-unit-clauses : 71
% 0.16/0.48 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 137
% 0.16/0.48 # ...number of literals in the above : 335
% 0.16/0.48 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Current number of archived clauses : 158
% 0.16/0.48 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3373
% 0.16/0.48 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1666
% 0.16/0.48 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.16/0.48 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.16/0.48 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # BW rewrite match attempts : 11
% 0.16/0.48 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.16/0.48 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.48 # Termbank termtop insertions : 10159
% 0.16/0.48
% 0.16/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.48 # User time : 0.022 s
% 0.16/0.48 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.16/0.48 # Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.16/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 2212 pages
% 0.16/0.48
% 0.16/0.48 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.48 # User time : 0.084 s
% 0.16/0.48 # System time : 0.013 s
% 0.16/0.48 # Total time : 0.098 s
% 0.16/0.48 # Maximum resident set size: 1816 pages
% 0.16/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.48 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------