TSTP Solution File: NUM066-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : NUM066-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 14:06:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.59s 2.82s
% Output   : Refutation 2.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   16 (  11 unt;   0 nHn;  15 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   28 (   0 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( ~ subclass(X,Y)
    | ~ member(Z,X)
    | member(Z,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(cartesian_product3,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X,Y)
    | ~ member(Z,U)
    | member(ordered_pair(X,Z),cross_product(Y,U)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',cartesian_product3) ).

cnf(element_relation3,axiom,
    ( ~ member(ordered_pair(X,Y),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class))
    | ~ member(X,Y)
    | member(ordered_pair(X,Y),element_relation) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',element_relation3) ).

cnf(well_ordering3,axiom,
    ( ~ well_ordering(X,Y)
    | ~ subclass(Z,Y)
    | ~ member(U,Z)
    | member(least(X,Z),Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM004-0.ax',well_ordering3) ).

cnf(well_ordering5,axiom,
    ( ~ well_ordering(X,Y)
    | ~ subclass(Z,Y)
    | ~ member(U,Z)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(U,least(X,Z)),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/NUM004-0.ax',well_ordering5) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_1,negated_conjecture,
    well_ordering(element_relation,y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_1) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_2,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(u,y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_2) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_3,negated_conjecture,
    member(v,u),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_3) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_4,negated_conjecture,
    member(v,least(element_relation,u)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_4) ).

cnf(234,plain,
    member(v,universal_class),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[subclass_members,class_elements_are_sets,prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_3]) ).

cnf(417,plain,
    member(least(element_relation,u),u),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[well_ordering3,prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_1,prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_2,prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_3]) ).

cnf(448,plain,
    ~ member(ordered_pair(v,least(element_relation,u)),element_relation),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[well_ordering5,prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_1,prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_2,prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_3]) ).

cnf(1026,plain,
    member(least(element_relation,u),universal_class),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[subclass_members,417,class_elements_are_sets]) ).

cnf(2701,plain,
    member(ordered_pair(v,least(element_relation,u)),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cartesian_product3,1026,234]) ).

cnf(12772,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[element_relation3,448,prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_4]),2701]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : NUM066-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 17:56:56 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  "."
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-06T17:56:56
% 0.19/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n003.cluster.edu at 2022-07-06T17:56:56
% 2.59/2.82  
% 2.59/2.82  
% 2.59/2.82  #||
% 2.59/2.82  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.59/2.82  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.59/2.82  ||#
% 2.59/2.82  
% 2.59/2.82  ; Summary of computation:
% 2.59/2.82  ;     24965 formulas have been input or derived (from 445 formulas).
% 2.59/2.82  ;     12772 (51%) were retained.  Of these,
% 2.59/2.82  ;          628 ( 5%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 2.59/2.82  ;        12144 (95%) are still being kept.
% 2.59/2.82  ; 
% 2.59/2.82  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 2.59/2.82  ;     0.031   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 2.59/2.82  ;     0.004   0%   Assert                       (162 calls)
% 2.59/2.82  ;     0.805  34%   Process new row              (24,319 calls)
% 2.59/2.82  ;     0.777  33%   Resolution                   (888 calls)
% 2.59/2.82  ;     0.009   0%   Paramodulation               (444 calls)
% 2.59/2.82  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (10 calls)
% 2.59/2.82  ;     0.014   1%   Condensing                   (2,098 calls)
% 2.59/2.82  ;     0.126   5%   Forward subsumption          (2,098 calls)
% 2.59/2.82  ;     0.098   4%   Backward subsumption         (1,917 calls)
% 2.59/2.82  ;     0.006   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (4,879 calls)
% 2.59/2.82  ;     0.248  11%   Forward simplification       (24,313 calls)
% 2.59/2.82  ;     0.109   5%   Backward simplification      (12,738 calls)
% 2.59/2.82  ;     0.012   1%   Ordering                     (4,533 calls)
% 2.59/2.82  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 2.59/2.82  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 2.59/2.82  ;     0.104   4%   Other
% 2.59/2.82  ;     2.343        Total
% 2.59/2.82  ;     2.346        Real time
% 2.59/2.82  ; 
% 2.59/2.83  ; Term-hash-array has 18,708 terms in all.
% 2.59/2.83  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,682 entries (1,682 at peak, 1,917 added, 235 deleted).
% 2.59/2.83  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 7,686 nodes (7,686 at peak, 8,724 added, 1,038 deleted).
% 2.59/2.83  ;  Retrieved 4,679 possibly forward subsuming rows in 2,098 calls.
% 2.59/2.83  ;  Retrieved 1,372 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,917 calls.
% 2.59/2.83  ; Path-index has 18,143 entries (18,143 at peak, 19,015 added, 872 deleted).
% 2.59/2.83  ; Path-index has 8,562 nodes (8,562 at peak, 8,734 added, 172 deleted).
% 2.59/2.83  ; Trie-index has 18,143 entries (18,143 at peak, 19,015 added, 872 deleted).
% 2.59/2.83  ; Trie-index has 46,867 nodes (46,867 at peak, 48,819 added, 1,952 deleted).
% 2.59/2.83  ; Retrieved 15,486 generalization terms in 60,089 calls.
% 2.59/2.83  ; Retrieved 10,862 instance terms in 10,823 calls.
% 2.59/2.83  ; Retrieved 1,746,600 unifiable terms in 18,669 calls.
% 2.59/2.83  ; 
% 2.59/2.83  ; The agenda of rows to process has 5 entries:
% 2.59/2.83  ;     2 with value 14              1 with value 15               2 with value 17
% 2.59/2.83  ; The agenda of rows to give has 11729 entries:
% 2.59/2.83  ;   208 with value (4 11)          8 with value (4 25)           3 with value (4 39)
% 2.59/2.83  ;   238 with value (4 12)         29 with value (4 26)           3 with value (4 41)
% 2.59/2.83  ;   378 with value (4 13)         21 with value (4 27)           3 with value (4 42)
% 2.59/2.83  ;   485 with value (4 14)         16 with value (4 28)           2 with value (4 43)
% 2.59/2.83  ;   790 with value (4 15)         17 with value (4 29)           1 with value (4 44)
% 2.59/2.83  ;  1348 with value (4 16)          4 with value (4 30)           2 with value (4 45)
% 2.59/2.83  ;  1814 with value (4 17)         12 with value (4 31)           6 with value (4 46)
% 2.59/2.83  ;  2643 with value (4 18)         15 with value (4 32)           3 with value (4 49)
% 2.59/2.83  ;  1726 with value (4 19)          7 with value (4 33)           1 with value (4 51)
% 2.59/2.83  ;  1058 with value (4 20)         10 with value (4 34)           1 with value (4 53)
% 2.59/2.83  ;   556 with value (4 21)          2 with value (4 35)           1 with value (4 55)
% 2.59/2.83  ;   229 with value (4 22)          3 with value (4 36)           1 with value (4 57)
% 2.59/2.83  ;    56 with value (4 23)          3 with value (4 37)           1 with value (4 59)
% 2.59/2.83  ;    21 with value (4 24)          3 with value (4 38)           1 with value (4 63)
% 2.59/2.83  Evaluation took:
% 2.59/2.83    2.348 seconds of real time
% 2.59/2.83    2.176067 seconds of user run time
% 2.59/2.83    0.17072 seconds of system run time
% 2.59/2.83    [Run times include 0.355 seconds GC run time.]
% 2.59/2.83    0 calls to %EVAL
% 2.59/2.83    0 page faults and
% 2.59/2.83    166,694,392 bytes consed.
% 2.59/2.83  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.59/2.83  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-06T17:56:59
% 2.59/2.83  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.59/2.83  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------