TSTP Solution File: NUM066-1 by E---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1
% Problem  : NUM066-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:45:52 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   75 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   90 (  49   ~;  39   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   49 (   6 sgn;   2   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JaCtFCLPoX/E---3.1_7394.p',subclass_members) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JaCtFCLPoX/E---3.1_7394.p',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(well_ordering3,axiom,
    ( member(least(X1,X3),X3)
    | ~ well_ordering(X1,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ member(X4,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JaCtFCLPoX/E---3.1_7394.p',well_ordering3) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_1,negated_conjecture,
    well_ordering(element_relation,y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JaCtFCLPoX/E---3.1_7394.p',prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_1) ).

cnf(element_relation3,axiom,
    ( member(ordered_pair(X1,X2),element_relation)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JaCtFCLPoX/E---3.1_7394.p',element_relation3) ).

cnf(cartesian_product3,axiom,
    ( member(ordered_pair(X1,X3),cross_product(X2,X4))
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JaCtFCLPoX/E---3.1_7394.p',cartesian_product3) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_3,negated_conjecture,
    member(v,u),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JaCtFCLPoX/E---3.1_7394.p',prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_3) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_2,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(u,y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JaCtFCLPoX/E---3.1_7394.p',prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_2) ).

cnf(well_ordering5,axiom,
    ( ~ well_ordering(X1,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ member(X4,X3)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(X4,least(X1,X3)),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JaCtFCLPoX/E---3.1_7394.p',well_ordering5) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_4,negated_conjecture,
    member(v,least(element_relation,u)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JaCtFCLPoX/E---3.1_7394.p',prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_4) ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    subclass_members ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    class_elements_are_sets ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    ( member(least(X1,X3),X3)
    | ~ well_ordering(X1,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ member(X4,X3) ),
    well_ordering3 ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    well_ordering(element_relation,y),
    prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_1 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    ( member(ordered_pair(X1,X2),element_relation)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(X1,X2),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    element_relation3 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    ( member(ordered_pair(X1,X3),cross_product(X2,X4))
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X4) ),
    cartesian_product3 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( member(X1,universal_class)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(least(element_relation,X1),X1)
    | ~ member(X2,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,y) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    member(v,u),
    prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_3 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(u,y),
    prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_2 ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    ( ~ well_ordering(X1,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X3,X2)
    | ~ member(X4,X3)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(X4,least(X1,X3)),X1) ),
    well_ordering5 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( member(ordered_pair(X1,X2),element_relation)
    | ~ member(X2,universal_class)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    member(least(element_relation,u),u),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ epred1_0
  <=> ! [X1] :
        ( ~ subclass(u,X1)
        | ~ well_ordering(element_relation,X1) ) ),
    introduced(definition) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ epred2_0
  <=> ! [X2] :
        ( ~ member(X2,u)
        | ~ member(X2,least(element_relation,u)) ) ),
    introduced(definition) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ well_ordering(element_relation,X1)
    | ~ member(least(element_relation,X2),universal_class)
    | ~ member(X3,least(element_relation,X2))
    | ~ member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    member(least(element_relation,u),universal_class),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( epred1_0
    | ~ well_ordering(element_relation,X1)
    | ~ subclass(u,X1) ),
    inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ epred2_0
    | ~ epred1_0 ),
    inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_23]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    epred1_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_13]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ epred2_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,least(element_relation,u))
    | ~ member(X1,u) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(split_equiv,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    member(v,least(element_relation,u)),
    prove_corollary_to_well_ordering_property1_4 ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_18])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13  % Problem    : NUM066-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.12/0.15  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 14:23:38 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.50  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.50  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.JaCtFCLPoX/E---3.1_7394.p
% 0.21/0.53  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # new_bool_3 with pid 7503 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.53  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 130s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 7515 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.53  # Search class: FGHSM-FFMS31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_103_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S0Y with 130s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.53  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 162
% 0.21/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 128
% 0.21/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 34
% 0.21/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 34
% 0.21/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 151
% 0.21/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 10
% 0.21/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 33
% 0.21/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 108
% 0.21/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.21/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 6
% 0.21/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 3
% 0.21/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 558
% 0.21/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 520
% 0.21/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.21/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 553
% 0.21/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.21/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 39
% 0.21/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 96
% 0.21/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 23
% 0.21/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.21/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.21/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 71
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 396
% 0.21/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1124
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 9
% 0.21/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1018
% 0.21/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 795
% 0.21/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 40
% 0.21/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 75
% 0.21/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 14
% 0.21/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.21/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 9756
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  # User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.21/0.53  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 2000 pages
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  # User time                : 0.010 s
% 0.21/0.53  # System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Total time               : 0.023 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1812 pages
% 0.21/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------