TSTP Solution File: NUM025-1 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : NUM025-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 11:55:02 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.40s
% Output   : Proof 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : NUM025-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 09:25:38 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.40  Command-line arguments: --no-flatten-goal
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.40  Take the following subset of the input axioms:
% 0.20/0.40    fof(a_less_than_b, hypothesis, less(a, b)).
% 0.20/0.40    fof(no_number_less_than_itself, axiom, ![A]: ~less(A, A)).
% 0.20/0.40    fof(prove_b_not_less_than_a, negated_conjecture, less(b, a)).
% 0.20/0.40    fof(transitivity_of_less, axiom, ![B, C, A2]: (~less(A2, B) | (~less(C, A2) | less(C, B)))).
% 0.20/0.40    fof(zero_is_the_first_number, axiom, ![A3]: ~equalish(successor(A3), n0)).
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Now clausify the problem and encode Horn clauses using encoding 3 of
% 0.20/0.40  http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~nicsma/papers/horn.pdf.
% 0.20/0.40  We repeatedly replace C & s=t => u=v by the two clauses:
% 0.20/0.40    fresh(y, y, x1...xn) = u
% 0.20/0.40    C => fresh(s, t, x1...xn) = v
% 0.20/0.40  where fresh is a fresh function symbol and x1..xn are the free
% 0.20/0.40  variables of u and v.
% 0.20/0.40  A predicate p(X) is encoded as p(X)=true (this is sound, because the
% 0.20/0.40  input problem has no model of domain size 1).
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  The encoding turns the above axioms into the following unit equations and goals:
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Axiom 1 (a_less_than_b): less(a, b) = true2.
% 0.20/0.40  Axiom 2 (prove_b_not_less_than_a): less(b, a) = true2.
% 0.20/0.40  Axiom 3 (transitivity_of_less): fresh(X, X, Y, Z) = true2.
% 0.20/0.40  Axiom 4 (transitivity_of_less): fresh2(X, X, Y, Z, W) = less(W, Z).
% 0.20/0.40  Axiom 5 (transitivity_of_less): fresh2(less(X, Y), true2, Y, Z, X) = fresh(less(Y, Z), true2, Z, X).
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Goal 1 (no_number_less_than_itself): less(X, X) = true2.
% 0.20/0.40  The goal is true when:
% 0.20/0.40    X = a
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  Proof:
% 0.20/0.40    less(a, a)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by axiom 4 (transitivity_of_less) R->L }
% 0.20/0.40    fresh2(true2, true2, b, a, a)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by axiom 1 (a_less_than_b) R->L }
% 0.20/0.40    fresh2(less(a, b), true2, b, a, a)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by axiom 5 (transitivity_of_less) }
% 0.20/0.40    fresh(less(b, a), true2, a, a)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by axiom 2 (prove_b_not_less_than_a) }
% 0.20/0.40    fresh(true2, true2, a, a)
% 0.20/0.40  = { by axiom 3 (transitivity_of_less) }
% 0.20/0.40    true2
% 0.20/0.40  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.40  
% 0.20/0.40  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------