TSTP Solution File: NUM024-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NUM024-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:50:52 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.84s 2.02s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  12 unt;   8 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   35 (  19   ~;  16   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   11 (   6   >;   5   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (;  41   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ less > equalish > predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd > multiply > add > #nlpp > successor > n0 > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(multiply,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(less,type,
    less: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(add,type,
    add: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(n0,type,
    n0: $i ).

tff(predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd,type,
    predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(equalish,type,
    equalish: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(successor,type,
    successor: $i > $i ).

tff(f_133,axiom,
    ! [A] : ~ equalish(successor(A),n0),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_105,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ~ less(A,B)
      | equalish(add(successor(predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd(B,A)),A),B) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_129,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : equalish(add(A,B),add(B,A)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_49,axiom,
    ! [A] : equalish(add(A,n0),A),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_122,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ~ equalish(X,Y)
      | ~ equalish(Y,Z)
      | equalish(X,Z) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_114,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ equalish(X,Y)
      | equalish(Y,X) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_127,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C] :
      ( ~ equalish(add(A,B),add(C,B))
      | equalish(A,C) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_130,axiom,
    less(a,a),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_32,plain,
    ! [A_30] : ~ equalish(successor(A_30),n0),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_133]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ! [B_18,A_17] :
      ( equalish(add(successor(predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd(B_18,A_17)),A_17),B_18)
      | ~ less(A_17,B_18) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_105]) ).

tff(c_28,plain,
    ! [A_28,B_29] : equalish(add(A_28,B_29),add(B_29,A_28)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_129]) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [A_1] : equalish(add(A_1,n0),A_1),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_49]) ).

tff(c_166,plain,
    ! [X_68,Z_69,Y_70] :
      ( equalish(X_68,Z_69)
      | ~ equalish(Y_70,Z_69)
      | ~ equalish(X_68,Y_70) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_122]) ).

tff(c_251,plain,
    ! [X_78,A_79] :
      ( equalish(X_78,A_79)
      | ~ equalish(X_78,add(A_79,n0)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_166]) ).

tff(c_290,plain,
    ! [B_82] : equalish(add(n0,B_82),B_82),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_251]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ! [Y_21,X_20] :
      ( equalish(Y_21,X_20)
      | ~ equalish(X_20,Y_21) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_114]) ).

tff(c_307,plain,
    ! [B_83] : equalish(B_83,add(n0,B_83)),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_290,c_22]) ).

tff(c_24,plain,
    ! [X_22,Z_24,Y_23] :
      ( equalish(X_22,Z_24)
      | ~ equalish(Y_23,Z_24)
      | ~ equalish(X_22,Y_23) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_122]) ).

tff(c_1057,plain,
    ! [X_124,B_125] :
      ( equalish(X_124,add(n0,B_125))
      | ~ equalish(X_124,B_125) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_307,c_24]) ).

tff(c_26,plain,
    ! [A_25,C_27,B_26] :
      ( equalish(A_25,C_27)
      | ~ equalish(add(A_25,B_26),add(C_27,B_26)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_127]) ).

tff(c_1238,plain,
    ! [A_133,B_134] :
      ( equalish(A_133,n0)
      | ~ equalish(add(A_133,B_134),B_134) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1057,c_26]) ).

tff(c_1266,plain,
    ! [B_18] :
      ( equalish(successor(predecessor_of_1st_minus_2nd(B_18,B_18)),n0)
      | ~ less(B_18,B_18) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_1238]) ).

tff(c_1292,plain,
    ! [B_18] : ~ less(B_18,B_18),
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_32,c_1266]) ).

tff(c_30,plain,
    less(a,a),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_130]) ).

tff(c_1302,plain,
    $false,
    inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_1292,c_30]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : NUM024-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.17/0.35  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 15:06:07 EDT 2023
% 0.17/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.84/2.02  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.20/2.02  
% 4.20/2.02  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.20/2.06  
% 4.20/2.06  Inference rules
% 4.20/2.06  ----------------------
% 4.20/2.06  #Ref     : 0
% 4.20/2.06  #Sup     : 272
% 4.20/2.06  #Fact    : 0
% 4.20/2.06  #Define  : 0
% 4.20/2.06  #Split   : 0
% 4.20/2.06  #Chain   : 0
% 4.20/2.06  #Close   : 0
% 4.20/2.06  
% 4.20/2.06  Ordering : KBO
% 4.20/2.06  
% 4.20/2.06  Simplification rules
% 4.20/2.06  ----------------------
% 4.20/2.06  #Subsume      : 11
% 4.20/2.06  #Demod        : 93
% 4.20/2.06  #Tautology    : 102
% 4.20/2.06  #SimpNegUnit  : 2
% 4.20/2.06  #BackRed      : 1
% 4.20/2.06  
% 4.20/2.06  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 4.20/2.06  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 4.20/2.06  
% 4.20/2.06  Timing (in seconds)
% 4.20/2.06  ----------------------
% 4.20/2.06  Preprocessing        : 0.44
% 4.20/2.06  Parsing              : 0.24
% 4.20/2.06  CNF conversion       : 0.03
% 4.20/2.06  Main loop            : 0.55
% 4.20/2.06  Inferencing          : 0.21
% 4.20/2.06  Reduction            : 0.16
% 4.20/2.06  Demodulation         : 0.12
% 4.20/2.06  BG Simplification    : 0.02
% 4.20/2.06  Subsumption          : 0.13
% 4.20/2.06  Abstraction          : 0.02
% 4.20/2.06  MUC search           : 0.00
% 4.20/2.06  Cooper               : 0.00
% 4.20/2.06  Total                : 1.05
% 4.20/2.06  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 4.20/2.06  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 4.20/2.06  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 4.20/2.06  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------