TSTP Solution File: NUM020-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : NUM020-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.GZV0qVlBQL true
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 12:39:00 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.76s
% Output : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : NUM020-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.GZV0qVlBQL true
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Fri Aug 25 17:13:53 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.21/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.65 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.65 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.21/0.69 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.21/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.21/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.21/0.76 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.21/0.76 % BCE start: 12
% 0.21/0.76 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.21/0.76 % PE start: 12
% 0.21/0.76 logic: neq
% 0.21/0.76 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.21/0.76 % done 51 iterations in 0.022s
% 0.21/0.76 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.21/0.76 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.21/0.76 thf(n0_type, type, n0: $i).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(successor_type, type, successor: $i > $i).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(add_type, type, add: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(equalish_type, type, equalish: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(successor_substitution, axiom,
% 0.21/0.76 (( ~( equalish @ A @ B ) ) |
% 0.21/0.76 ( equalish @ ( successor @ A ) @ ( successor @ B ) ))).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 0.21/0.76 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.76 (~ (equalish @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.21/0.76 | (equalish @ (successor @ X0) @ (successor @ X1)))),
% 0.21/0.76 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [successor_substitution])).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(addition, axiom,
% 0.21/0.76 (equalish @
% 0.21/0.76 ( add @ A @ ( successor @ B ) ) @ ( successor @ ( add @ A @ B ) ))).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.21/0.76 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.76 (equalish @ (add @ X0 @ (successor @ X1)) @
% 0.21/0.76 (successor @ (add @ X0 @ X1)))),
% 0.21/0.76 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [addition])).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(transitivity, axiom,
% 0.21/0.76 (( ~( equalish @ X @ Y ) ) | ( ~( equalish @ Y @ Z ) ) |
% 0.21/0.76 ( equalish @ X @ Z ))).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.21/0.76 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.76 (~ (equalish @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.21/0.76 | ~ (equalish @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.21/0.76 | (equalish @ X0 @ X2))),
% 0.21/0.76 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [transitivity])).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain,
% 0.21/0.76 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.21/0.76 ( (equalish @ (add @ X1 @ (successor @ X0)) @ X2)
% 0.21/0.76 | ~ (equalish @ (successor @ (add @ X1 @ X0)) @ X2))),
% 0.21/0.76 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl8])).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(deny_addition_lemma, conjecture,
% 0.21/0.76 (equalish @ ( add @ a @ ( successor @ n0 ) ) @ ( successor @ a ))).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.76 (~( equalish @ ( add @ a @ ( successor @ n0 ) ) @ ( successor @ a ) )),
% 0.21/0.76 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [deny_addition_lemma])).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain,
% 0.21/0.76 (~ (equalish @ (add @ a @ (successor @ n0)) @ (successor @ a))),
% 0.21/0.76 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl115, plain,
% 0.21/0.76 (~ (equalish @ (successor @ (add @ a @ n0)) @ (successor @ a))),
% 0.21/0.76 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl20, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl118, plain, (~ (equalish @ (add @ a @ n0) @ a)),
% 0.21/0.76 inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl115])).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(adding_zero, axiom, (equalish @ ( add @ A @ n0 ) @ A)).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (equalish @ (add @ X0 @ n0) @ X0)),
% 0.21/0.76 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [adding_zero])).
% 0.21/0.76 thf(zip_derived_cl119, plain, ($false),
% 0.21/0.76 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl118, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.21/0.76
% 0.21/0.76 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.21/0.76
% 0.21/0.76
% 0.21/0.76 % Terminating...
% 1.12/0.84 % Runner terminated.
% 1.12/0.85 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------