TSTP Solution File: NUM020-1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NUM020-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:50:51 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.88s 2.75s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   8 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (  12   ~;   9   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   4   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (;  22   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ equalish > multiply > add > #nlpp > successor > n1 > n0 > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(multiply,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(n1,type,
    n1: $i ).

tff(add,type,
    add: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(n0,type,
    n0: $i ).

tff(equalish,type,
    equalish: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(successor,type,
    successor: $i > $i ).

tff(f_51,axiom,
    ! [A] : equalish(add(A,n0),A),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_53,axiom,
    ! [A,B] : equalish(add(A,successor(B)),successor(add(A,B))),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_67,axiom,
    ! [A,B] :
      ( ~ equalish(A,B)
      | equalish(successor(A),successor(B)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_84,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ~ equalish(X,Y)
      | ~ equalish(Y,Z)
      | equalish(X,Z) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_87,axiom,
    ~ equalish(add(a,successor(n0)),successor(a)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_2,plain,
    ! [A_1] : equalish(add(A_1,n0),A_1),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_51]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [A_2,B_3] : equalish(add(A_2,successor(B_3)),successor(add(A_2,B_3))),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_53]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [A_9,B_10] :
      ( equalish(successor(A_9),successor(B_10))
      | ~ equalish(A_9,B_10) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_67]) ).

tff(c_84,plain,
    ! [X_34,Z_35,Y_36] :
      ( equalish(X_34,Z_35)
      | ~ equalish(Y_36,Z_35)
      | ~ equalish(X_34,Y_36) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_84]) ).

tff(c_707,plain,
    ! [X_74,B_75,A_76] :
      ( equalish(X_74,successor(B_75))
      | ~ equalish(X_74,successor(A_76))
      | ~ equalish(A_76,B_75) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_84]) ).

tff(c_4921,plain,
    ! [A_166,B_167,B_168] :
      ( equalish(add(A_166,successor(B_167)),successor(B_168))
      | ~ equalish(add(A_166,B_167),B_168) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_707]) ).

tff(c_22,plain,
    ~ equalish(add(a,successor(n0)),successor(a)),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_87]) ).

tff(c_4947,plain,
    ~ equalish(add(a,n0),a),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4921,c_22]) ).

tff(c_4962,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_2,c_4947]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : NUM020-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 15:21:20 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 6.88/2.75  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 6.88/2.76  
% 6.88/2.76  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.17/2.78  
% 7.17/2.78  Inference rules
% 7.17/2.78  ----------------------
% 7.17/2.78  #Ref     : 0
% 7.17/2.78  #Sup     : 1145
% 7.17/2.78  #Fact    : 0
% 7.17/2.78  #Define  : 0
% 7.17/2.78  #Split   : 1
% 7.17/2.78  #Chain   : 0
% 7.17/2.78  #Close   : 0
% 7.17/2.78  
% 7.17/2.78  Ordering : KBO
% 7.17/2.78  
% 7.17/2.78  Simplification rules
% 7.17/2.78  ----------------------
% 7.17/2.78  #Subsume      : 235
% 7.17/2.78  #Demod        : 431
% 7.17/2.78  #Tautology    : 307
% 7.17/2.78  #SimpNegUnit  : 31
% 7.17/2.78  #BackRed      : 0
% 7.17/2.78  
% 7.17/2.78  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 7.17/2.78  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 7.17/2.78  
% 7.17/2.78  Timing (in seconds)
% 7.17/2.78  ----------------------
% 7.17/2.79  Preprocessing        : 0.43
% 7.17/2.79  Parsing              : 0.23
% 7.17/2.79  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 7.17/2.79  Main loop            : 1.27
% 7.17/2.79  Inferencing          : 0.41
% 7.17/2.79  Reduction            : 0.37
% 7.17/2.79  Demodulation         : 0.26
% 7.17/2.79  BG Simplification    : 0.03
% 7.17/2.79  Subsumption          : 0.39
% 7.17/2.79  Abstraction          : 0.04
% 7.17/2.79  MUC search           : 0.00
% 7.17/2.79  Cooper               : 0.00
% 7.17/2.79  Total                : 1.75
% 7.17/2.79  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 7.17/2.79  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 7.17/2.79  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 7.17/2.79  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------