TSTP Solution File: NUM016-2 by SnakeForV---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem  : NUM016-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 17:56:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   28 (  16   ~;  12   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   1 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (  11   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f21,f14]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    divides(prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(a)),factorial_plus_one(a)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f9,f5]) ).

fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( divides(prime_divisor(X0),X0)
      | prime(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',division_by_prime_divisor) ).

fof(f9,plain,
    ~ prime(factorial_plus_one(a)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f3,f1,f8]) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( less(factorial_plus_one(a),X0)
      | ~ prime(X0)
      | ~ less(a,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_there_is_another_prime) ).

fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0] : ~ less(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',nothing_is_less_than_itself) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X0] : less(X0,factorial_plus_one(X0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a_prime_is_less_than_the_next_one) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ~ divides(prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(a)),factorial_plus_one(a)),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f20,f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ divides(X0,factorial_plus_one(X1))
      | less(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',divisor_is_smaller) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ~ less(a,prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(a))),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f19,f12]) ).

fof(f12,plain,
    prime(prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(a))),
    inference(unit_resulting_resolution,[],[f9,f6]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( prime(prime_divisor(X0))
      | prime(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prime_divsiors) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ( ~ less(a,prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(a)))
    | ~ prime(prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(a))) ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f15,f9]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ( ~ less(a,prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(a)))
    | prime(factorial_plus_one(a))
    | ~ prime(prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(a))) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f11,f7]) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( less(prime_divisor(X0),X0)
      | prime(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',smaller_prime_divisors) ).

fof(f11,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ less(X0,factorial_plus_one(a))
      | ~ less(a,X0)
      | ~ prime(X0) ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f8,f2]) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ less(X0,X1)
      | ~ less(X1,X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',numbers_are_different) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : NUM016-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 05:57:59 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  % (23987)ott+21_1:1_erd=off:s2a=on:sac=on:sd=1:sgt=64:sos=on:ss=included:st=3.0:to=lpo:urr=on:i=97:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/97Mi)
% 0.20/0.48  % (23987)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.48  % (23973)lrs+1011_1:1_atotf=0.0306256:ep=RST:mep=off:nm=0:sos=all:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.20/0.48  % (23980)fmb+10_1:1_fmbes=contour:fmbsr=2.0:fmbsso=input_usage:i=6:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/6Mi)
% 0.20/0.48  % (23973)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.20/0.48  TRYING [1]
% 0.20/0.49  % (23987)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49  % (23987)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (23987)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.49  % (23987)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.49  % (23987)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  % (23987)Memory used [KB]: 5756
% 0.20/0.49  % (23987)Time elapsed: 0.067 s
% 0.20/0.49  % (23987)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.20/0.49  % (23987)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (23987)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (23963)Success in time 0.136 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------