TSTP Solution File: NUM016-2 by Prover9---1109a

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---1109a
% Problem  : NUM016-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 13:24:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.43s 0.97s
% Output   : Refutation 0.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : NUM016-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : tptp2X_and_run_prover9 %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul  6 16:30:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== Prover9 ===============================
% 0.43/0.97  Prover9 (32) version 2009-11A, November 2009.
% 0.43/0.97  Process 19816 was started by sandbox2 on n008.cluster.edu,
% 0.43/0.97  Wed Jul  6 16:30:24 2022
% 0.43/0.97  The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -t 300 -f /tmp/Prover9_19466_n008.cluster.edu".
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== end of head ===========================
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== INPUT =================================
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  % Reading from file /tmp/Prover9_19466_n008.cluster.edu
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.43/0.97  set(auto2).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto2) -> set(auto).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto) -> set(auto_inference).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto) -> set(auto_setup).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto_setup) -> set(predicate_elim).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto_setup) -> assign(eq_defs, unfold).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto) -> set(auto_limits).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(max_weight, "100.000").
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto_limits) -> assign(sos_limit, 20000).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto) -> set(auto_denials).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto) -> set(auto_process).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(new_constants, 1).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(fold_denial_max, 3).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_weight, "200.000").
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_hours, 1).
% 0.43/0.97      % assign(max_hours, 1) -> assign(max_seconds, 3600).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_seconds, 0).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_minutes, 5).
% 0.43/0.97      % assign(max_minutes, 5) -> assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto2) -> set(sort_initial_sos).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(sos_limit, -1).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(lrs_ticks, 3000).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(max_megs, 400).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto2) -> assign(stats, some).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto2) -> clear(echo_input).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto2) -> set(quiet).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_initial_clauses).
% 0.43/0.97      % set(auto2) -> clear(print_given).
% 0.43/0.97  assign(lrs_ticks,-1).
% 0.43/0.97  assign(sos_limit,10000).
% 0.43/0.97  assign(order,kbo).
% 0.43/0.97  set(lex_order_vars).
% 0.43/0.97  clear(print_given).
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  % formulas(sos).  % not echoed (8 formulas)
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== end of input ==========================
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== PROCESS NON-CLAUSAL FORMULAS ==========
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  % Formulas that are not ordinary clauses:
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== end of process non-clausal formulas ===
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== PROCESS INITIAL CLAUSES ===============
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== PREDICATE ELIMINATION =================
% 0.43/0.97  1 -divides(A,factorial_plus_one(B)) | less(B,A) # label(divisor_is_smaller) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.97  2 prime(A) | divides(prime_divisor(A),A) # label(division_by_prime_divisor) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.97  Derived: less(A,prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(A))) | prime(factorial_plus_one(A)).  [resolve(1,a,2,b)].
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== end predicate elimination =============
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  Auto_denials:  (non-Horn, no changes).
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  Term ordering decisions:
% 0.43/0.97  Function symbol KB weights:  a=1. factorial_plus_one=1. prime_divisor=1.
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== end of process initial clauses ========
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== CLAUSES FOR SEARCH ====================
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== end of clauses for search =============
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== SEARCH ================================
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  % Starting search at 0.01 seconds.
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== PROOF =================================
% 0.43/0.97  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.43/0.97  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.43/0.97  % Length of proof is 15.
% 0.43/0.97  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.43/0.97  % Maximum clause weight is 10.000.
% 0.43/0.97  % Given clauses 11.
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  1 -divides(A,factorial_plus_one(B)) | less(B,A) # label(divisor_is_smaller) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.97  2 prime(A) | divides(prime_divisor(A),A) # label(division_by_prime_divisor) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.97  3 less(A,factorial_plus_one(A)) # label(a_prime_is_less_than_the_next_one) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.97  4 prime(A) | prime(prime_divisor(A)) # label(prime_divsiors) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.97  5 prime(A) | less(prime_divisor(A),A) # label(smaller_prime_divisors) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.97  6 -less(A,A) # label(nothing_is_less_than_itself) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.97  7 -less(A,B) | -less(B,A) # label(numbers_are_different) # label(axiom).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.97  8 -prime(A) | -less(a,A) | less(factorial_plus_one(a),A) # label(prove_there_is_another_prime) # label(negated_conjecture).  [assumption].
% 0.43/0.97  9 less(A,prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(A))) | prime(factorial_plus_one(A)).  [resolve(1,a,2,b)].
% 0.43/0.97  10 -less(A,prime_divisor(A)) | prime(A).  [resolve(7,a,5,b)].
% 0.43/0.97  12 -prime(factorial_plus_one(a)).  [resolve(8,b,3,a),unit_del(b,6)].
% 0.43/0.97  13 -prime(prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(a))) | less(factorial_plus_one(a),prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(a))).  [resolve(9,a,8,b),unit_del(a,12)].
% 0.43/0.97  15 -less(factorial_plus_one(a),prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(a))).  [ur(10,b,12,a)].
% 0.43/0.97  16 -prime(prime_divisor(factorial_plus_one(a))).  [back_unit_del(13),unit_del(b,15)].
% 0.43/0.97  17 $F.  [resolve(16,a,4,b),unit_del(a,12)].
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== end of proof ==========================
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== STATISTICS ============================
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  Given=11. Generated=22. Kept=14. proofs=1.
% 0.43/0.97  Usable=11. Sos=2. Demods=0. Limbo=0, Disabled=10. Hints=0.
% 0.43/0.97  Megabytes=0.03.
% 0.43/0.97  User_CPU=0.01, System_CPU=0.00, Wall_clock=0.
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== end of statistics =====================
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  ============================== end of search =========================
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  THEOREM PROVED
% 0.43/0.97  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  Exiting with 1 proof.
% 0.43/0.97  
% 0.43/0.97  Process 19816 exit (max_proofs) Wed Jul  6 16:30:24 2022
% 0.43/0.97  Prover9 interrupted
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------