TSTP Solution File: NLP261+1 by lazyCoP---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem  : NLP261+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 02:57:47 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 29.76s 11.84s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : NLP261+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.1.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Fri Jul  1 08:44:14 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 29.76/11.84  % SZS status Theorem
% 29.76/11.84  % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c0, axiom,
% 29.76/11.84  	~hypernym(n9986904,n10560637)).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c1, plain,
% 29.76/11.84  	~hypernym(n9986904,n10560637),
% 29.76/11.84  	inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 29.76/11.84  
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c2, axiom,
% 29.76/11.84  	hypernym(X0,X1) | ~hypernym(X2,X1) | ~hypernym(X0,X2)).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(a0, assumption,
% 29.76/11.84  	n9986904 = X0).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(a1, assumption,
% 29.76/11.84  	n10560637 = X1).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c3, plain,
% 29.76/11.84  	$false,
% 29.76/11.84  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c4, plain,
% 29.76/11.84  	~hypernym(X2,X1) | ~hypernym(X0,X2),
% 29.76/11.84  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 29.76/11.84  
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c5, axiom,
% 29.76/11.84  	hypernym(n9855630,n10560637)).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(a2, assumption,
% 29.76/11.84  	X2 = n9855630).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(a3, assumption,
% 29.76/11.84  	X1 = n10560637).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c6, plain,
% 29.76/11.84  	~hypernym(X0,X2),
% 29.76/11.84  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3])], [c4, c5])).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c7, plain,
% 29.76/11.84  	$false,
% 29.76/11.84  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3])], [c4, c5])).
% 29.76/11.84  
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c8, axiom,
% 29.76/11.84  	hypernym(X3,X4) | ~hypernym(X5,X4) | ~hypernym(X3,X5)).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(a4, assumption,
% 29.76/11.84  	X0 = X3).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(a5, assumption,
% 29.76/11.84  	X2 = X4).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c9, plain,
% 29.76/11.84  	$false,
% 29.76/11.84  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4, a5])], [c6, c8])).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c10, plain,
% 29.76/11.84  	~hypernym(X5,X4) | ~hypernym(X3,X5),
% 29.76/11.84  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4, a5])], [c6, c8])).
% 29.76/11.84  
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c11, axiom,
% 29.76/11.84  	hypernym(n10126424,n9855630)).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(a6, assumption,
% 29.76/11.84  	X5 = n10126424).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(a7, assumption,
% 29.76/11.84  	X4 = n9855630).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c12, plain,
% 29.76/11.84  	~hypernym(X3,X5),
% 29.76/11.84  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a6, a7])], [c10, c11])).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c13, plain,
% 29.76/11.84  	$false,
% 29.76/11.84  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a6, a7])], [c10, c11])).
% 29.76/11.84  
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c14, axiom,
% 29.76/11.84  	hypernym(n9986904,n10126424)).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(a8, assumption,
% 29.76/11.84  	X3 = n9986904).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(a9, assumption,
% 29.76/11.84  	X5 = n10126424).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c15, plain,
% 29.76/11.84  	$false,
% 29.76/11.84  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a8, a9])], [c12, c14])).
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c16, plain,
% 29.76/11.84  	$false,
% 29.76/11.84  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a8, a9])], [c12, c14])).
% 29.76/11.84  
% 29.76/11.84  cnf(c17, plain,
% 29.76/11.84  	$false,
% 29.76/11.84  	inference(constraint_solving, [
% 29.76/11.84  		bind(X0, n9986904),
% 29.76/11.84  		bind(X1, n10560637),
% 29.76/11.84  		bind(X2, n9855630),
% 29.76/11.84  		bind(X3, n9986904),
% 29.76/11.84  		bind(X4, n9855630),
% 29.76/11.84  		bind(X5, n10126424)
% 29.76/11.84  	],
% 29.76/11.84  	[a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6, a7, a8, a9])).
% 29.76/11.84  
% 29.76/11.84  % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------