TSTP Solution File: NLP261+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : NLP261+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 01:54:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 20.60s 13.96s
% Output : CNFRefutation 20.60s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 20 ( 0 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( hypernym(X1,X2)
| ~ hypernym(X3,X2)
| ~ hypernym(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-r38amrd3/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_2546,plain,
hypernym(n9855630,n10560637),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-r38amrd3/input.p',i_0_2546) ).
cnf(i_0_853,plain,
hypernym(n10126424,n9855630),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-r38amrd3/input.p',i_0_853) ).
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ hypernym(n9986904,n10560637),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-r38amrd3/input.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(i_0_107,plain,
hypernym(n9986904,n10126424),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-r38amrd3/input.p',i_0_107) ).
cnf(c_0_2552,plain,
( hypernym(X1,X2)
| ~ hypernym(X3,X2)
| ~ hypernym(X1,X3) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_2553,plain,
hypernym(n9855630,n10560637),
i_0_2546 ).
cnf(c_0_2554,plain,
hypernym(n10126424,n9855630),
i_0_853 ).
cnf(c_0_2555,negated_conjecture,
~ hypernym(n9986904,n10560637),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_2556,plain,
( hypernym(X1,n10560637)
| ~ hypernym(X1,n9855630) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2552,c_0_2553]) ).
cnf(c_0_2557,plain,
( hypernym(X1,n9855630)
| ~ hypernym(X1,n10126424) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2552,c_0_2554]) ).
cnf(c_0_2558,plain,
hypernym(n9986904,n10126424),
i_0_107 ).
cnf(c_0_2559,negated_conjecture,
~ hypernym(n9986904,n9855630),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2555,c_0_2556]) ).
cnf(c_0_2560,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2557,c_0_2558]),c_0_2559]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : NLP261+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.1.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jul 1 08:57:41 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.44 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 10.77/11.01 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.77/11.01 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 10.77/11.01 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 10.77/11.01 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 20.60/13.96 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 20.60/13.96 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 20.60/13.96 # Preprocessing time : 0.057 s
% 20.60/13.96
% 20.60/13.96 # Proof found!
% 20.60/13.96 # SZS status Theorem
% 20.60/13.96 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 20.60/13.96 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 20.60/13.96 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 20.60/13.96 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 20.60/13.96 # Proof object conjectures : 3
% 20.60/13.96 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 20.60/13.96 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 20.60/13.96 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 20.60/13.96 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 20.60/13.96 # Proof object generating inferences : 4
% 20.60/13.96 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 20.60/13.96 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 20.60/13.96 # Parsed axioms : 2807
% 20.60/13.96 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Initial clauses : 2807
% 20.60/13.96 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2807
% 20.60/13.96 # Processed clauses : 2839
% 20.60/13.96 # ...of these trivial : 111
% 20.60/13.96 # ...subsumed : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # ...remaining for further processing : 2727
% 20.60/13.96 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Generated clauses : 996
% 20.60/13.96 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 539
% 20.60/13.96 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Paramodulations : 996
% 20.60/13.96 # Factorizations : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Current number of processed clauses : 2727
% 20.60/13.96 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2702
% 20.60/13.96 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 20.60/13.96 # Non-unit-clauses : 21
% 20.60/13.96 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 507
% 20.60/13.96 # ...number of literals in the above : 973
% 20.60/13.96 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 213
% 20.60/13.96 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 93
% 20.60/13.96 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 38
% 20.60/13.96 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Condensation successes : 0
% 20.60/13.96 # Termbank termtop insertions : 29553
% 20.60/13.96
% 20.60/13.96 # -------------------------------------------------
% 20.60/13.96 # User time : 0.092 s
% 20.60/13.96 # System time : 0.007 s
% 20.60/13.96 # Total time : 0.099 s
% 20.60/13.96 # ...preprocessing : 0.057 s
% 20.60/13.96 # ...main loop : 0.042 s
% 20.60/13.96 # Maximum resident set size: 20124 pages
% 20.60/13.96
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------