TSTP Solution File: NLP260+1 by lazyCoP---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem : NLP260+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 02:57:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 11.88s 9.90s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : NLP260+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.1.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 20:59:28 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 11.88/9.90 % SZS status Theorem
% 11.88/9.90 % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(c0, axiom,
% 11.88/9.90 ~hypernym(n9986904,n9855630)).
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(c1, plain,
% 11.88/9.90 ~hypernym(n9986904,n9855630),
% 11.88/9.90 inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 11.88/9.90
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(c2, axiom,
% 11.88/9.90 hypernym(X0,X1) | ~hypernym(X2,X1) | ~hypernym(X0,X2)).
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(a0, assumption,
% 11.88/9.90 n9986904 = X0).
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(a1, assumption,
% 11.88/9.90 n9855630 = X1).
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(c3, plain,
% 11.88/9.90 $false,
% 11.88/9.90 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(c4, plain,
% 11.88/9.90 ~hypernym(X2,X1) | ~hypernym(X0,X2),
% 11.88/9.90 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a0, a1])], [c1, c2])).
% 11.88/9.90
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(c5, axiom,
% 11.88/9.90 hypernym(n10126424,n9855630)).
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(a2, assumption,
% 11.88/9.90 X2 = n10126424).
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(a3, assumption,
% 11.88/9.90 X1 = n9855630).
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(c6, plain,
% 11.88/9.90 ~hypernym(X0,X2),
% 11.88/9.90 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3])], [c4, c5])).
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(c7, plain,
% 11.88/9.90 $false,
% 11.88/9.90 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a2, a3])], [c4, c5])).
% 11.88/9.90
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(c8, axiom,
% 11.88/9.90 hypernym(n9986904,n10126424)).
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(a4, assumption,
% 11.88/9.90 X0 = n9986904).
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(a5, assumption,
% 11.88/9.90 X2 = n10126424).
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(c9, plain,
% 11.88/9.90 $false,
% 11.88/9.90 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4, a5])], [c6, c8])).
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(c10, plain,
% 11.88/9.90 $false,
% 11.88/9.90 inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a4, a5])], [c6, c8])).
% 11.88/9.90
% 11.88/9.90 cnf(c11, plain,
% 11.88/9.90 $false,
% 11.88/9.90 inference(constraint_solving, [
% 11.88/9.90 bind(X0, n9986904),
% 11.88/9.90 bind(X1, n9855630),
% 11.88/9.90 bind(X2, n10126424)
% 11.88/9.90 ],
% 11.88/9.90 [a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5])).
% 11.88/9.90
% 11.88/9.90 % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------