TSTP Solution File: NLP260+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : NLP260+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 01:54:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 19.58s 13.78s
% Output : CNFRefutation 19.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 15 ( 0 equ; 7 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,plain,
( hypernym(X1,X2)
| ~ hypernym(X3,X2)
| ~ hypernym(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8qgqi98a/input.p',i_0_1) ).
cnf(i_0_918,plain,
hypernym(n10126424,n9855630),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8qgqi98a/input.p',i_0_918) ).
cnf(i_0_83,plain,
hypernym(n9986904,n10126424),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8qgqi98a/input.p',i_0_83) ).
cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ hypernym(n9986904,n9855630),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-8qgqi98a/input.p',i_0_4) ).
cnf(c_0_923,plain,
( hypernym(X1,X2)
| ~ hypernym(X3,X2)
| ~ hypernym(X1,X3) ),
i_0_1 ).
cnf(c_0_924,plain,
hypernym(n10126424,n9855630),
i_0_918 ).
cnf(c_0_925,plain,
( hypernym(X1,n9855630)
| ~ hypernym(X1,n10126424) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_923,c_0_924]) ).
cnf(c_0_926,plain,
hypernym(n9986904,n10126424),
i_0_83 ).
cnf(c_0_927,negated_conjecture,
~ hypernym(n9986904,n9855630),
i_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_928,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_925,c_0_926]),c_0_927]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : NLP260+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v4.0.1.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 20:59:17 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 10.91/11.13 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 10.91/11.13 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 10.91/11.13 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 10.91/11.13 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 19.58/13.78 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_S0Y:
% 19.58/13.78 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 19.58/13.78 # Preprocessing time : 0.037 s
% 19.58/13.78
% 19.58/13.78 # Proof found!
% 19.58/13.78 # SZS status Theorem
% 19.58/13.78 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 19.58/13.79 # Proof object total steps : 10
% 19.58/13.79 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 19.58/13.79 # Proof object formula steps : 4
% 19.58/13.79 # Proof object conjectures : 2
% 19.58/13.79 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 19.58/13.79 # Proof object formula conjectures : 1
% 19.58/13.79 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 19.58/13.79 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 19.58/13.79 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 19.58/13.79 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 19.58/13.79 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 19.58/13.79 # Parsed axioms : 2713
% 19.58/13.79 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Initial clauses : 2713
% 19.58/13.79 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2713
% 19.58/13.79 # Processed clauses : 2714
% 19.58/13.79 # ...of these trivial : 117
% 19.58/13.79 # ...subsumed : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # ...remaining for further processing : 2597
% 19.58/13.79 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Generated clauses : 720
% 19.58/13.79 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 360
% 19.58/13.79 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Paramodulations : 720
% 19.58/13.79 # Factorizations : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Current number of processed clauses : 2597
% 19.58/13.79 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 2592
% 19.58/13.79 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 19.58/13.79 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 19.58/13.79 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 359
% 19.58/13.79 # ...number of literals in the above : 716
% 19.58/13.79 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9
% 19.58/13.79 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 19.58/13.79 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Condensation successes : 0
% 19.58/13.79 # Termbank termtop insertions : 26782
% 19.58/13.79
% 19.58/13.79 # -------------------------------------------------
% 19.58/13.79 # User time : 0.058 s
% 19.58/13.79 # System time : 0.012 s
% 19.58/13.79 # Total time : 0.070 s
% 19.58/13.79 # ...preprocessing : 0.037 s
% 19.58/13.79 # ...main loop : 0.033 s
% 19.58/13.79 # Maximum resident set size: 19460 pages
% 19.58/13.79
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------