TSTP Solution File: NLP237-1 by CARINE---0.734

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CARINE---0.734
% Problem  : NLP237-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : add_equality
% Format   : carine
% Command  : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000

% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model    : i686 i686
% CPU      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory   : 2018MB
% OS       : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 03:02:31 EST 2010

% Result   : GaveUp 1.44s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    : 0

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP15326/NLP/NLP237-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ..................................................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 1260] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 2804] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 4348] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 5892] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 7436] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 8980] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 10524] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 0 secs [nr = 12068] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 13612] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 15156] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 16700] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 18244] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 19788] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 21332] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 22876] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 24420] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 25964] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 27508] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 29052] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 30596] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 32140] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 33684] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 35228] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 36772] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 38316] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 39860] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 41404] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 42948] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 44492] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 46036] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 47296] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 48840] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 50400] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 51960] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 53520] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 55080] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 56640] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 58200] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 59760] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 61320] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 62880] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 64440] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 66000] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 67560] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 69120] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 70680] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 72240] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 73800] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 75360] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 76920] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 78480] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 80040] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 81600] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 83160] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% 	t = 1 secs [nr = 84720] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 86280] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 87840] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 89400] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 90960] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% 	t = 2 secs [nr = 92520] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% GIVE UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% |                Statistics                 |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 92520
% 	resolvents: 92520	factors: 0
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2		
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 75600	[3] = 16472	[4] = 448	
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssSkC0		(+)0	(-)0
% [1] actual_world_1	(+)2	(-)0
% [2] accessible_world_2	(+)0	(-)0
% [3] event_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [4] forename_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [5] jules_forename_2	(+)0	(-)0
% [6] man_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [7] present_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [8] proposition_2	(+)0	(-)0
% [9] smoke_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [10] state_2		(+)0	(-)0
% [11] think_believe_consider_2	(+)0	(-)0
% [12] vincent_forename_2	(+)0	(-)0
% [13] agent_3		(+)0	(-)0
% [14] of_3		(+)0	(-)0
% [15] theme_3		(+)0	(-)0
% [16] be_4		(+)0	(-)0
% 			------------------
% 		Total:	(+)2	(-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 31410
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% 	because of the shortest resolvents table: 568
% Number of successful unifications: 92520
% Number of unification failures: 0
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 16188312
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 7081392
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 1
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 2
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.50
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 84
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 92520
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% |                                                      |
%   Inferences per sec: 92520
% |                                                      |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 2 secs
% CPU time: 1.44 secs
% 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------