%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NLP229+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:50:40 EDT 2023

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 7.83s 2.77s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : NLP229+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 12:58:18 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 7.83/2.77  
% 7.83/2.77  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.83/2.77  
% 7.83/2.77  Inference rules
% 7.83/2.77  ----------------------
% 7.83/2.77  #Ref     : 0
% 7.83/2.77  #Sup     : 396
% 7.83/2.77  #Fact    : 0
% 7.83/2.77  #Define  : 0
% 7.83/2.77  #Split   : 3
% 7.83/2.77  #Chain   : 0
% 7.83/2.77  #Close   : 0
% 7.83/2.77  
% 7.83/2.77  Ordering : KBO
% 7.83/2.77  
% 7.83/2.77  Simplification rules
% 7.83/2.77  ----------------------
% 7.83/2.77  #Subsume      : 156
% 7.83/2.77  #Demod        : 35
% 7.83/2.77  #Tautology    : 11
% 7.83/2.77  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 7.83/2.77  #BackRed      : 0
% 7.83/2.77  
% 7.83/2.77  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 7.83/2.77  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 7.83/2.77  
% 7.83/2.77  Timing (in seconds)
% 7.83/2.77  ----------------------
% 7.83/2.78  Preprocessing        : 0.63
% 7.83/2.78  Parsing              : 0.35
% 7.83/2.78  CNF conversion       : 0.06
% 7.83/2.78  Main loop            : 1.14
% 7.83/2.78  Inferencing          : 0.49
% 7.83/2.78  Reduction            : 0.25
% 7.83/2.78  Demodulation         : 0.16
% 7.83/2.78  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 7.83/2.78  Subsumption          : 0.28
% 7.83/2.78  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 7.83/2.78  MUC search           : 0.00
% 7.83/2.78  Cooper               : 0.00
% 7.83/2.78  Total                : 1.79
% 7.83/2.78  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 7.83/2.78  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 7.83/2.78  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 7.83/2.78  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------