TSTP Solution File: NLP223+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : NLP223+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:50:39 EDT 2023

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 8.01s 2.94s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : NLP223+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 12:56:14 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 8.01/2.94  
% 8.01/2.94  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 8.01/2.94  
% 8.01/2.94  Inference rules
% 8.01/2.94  ----------------------
% 8.01/2.94  #Ref     : 0
% 8.01/2.94  #Sup     : 6
% 8.01/2.94  #Fact    : 0
% 8.01/2.94  #Define  : 0
% 8.01/2.94  #Split   : 43
% 8.01/2.94  #Chain   : 0
% 8.01/2.94  #Close   : 0
% 8.01/2.94  
% 8.01/2.94  Ordering : KBO
% 8.01/2.94  
% 8.01/2.94  Simplification rules
% 8.01/2.94  ----------------------
% 8.01/2.94  #Subsume      : 57
% 8.01/2.94  #Demod        : 510
% 8.01/2.94  #Tautology    : 504
% 8.01/2.94  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 8.01/2.94  #BackRed      : 0
% 8.01/2.94  
% 8.01/2.94  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 8.01/2.94  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 8.01/2.94  
% 8.01/2.94  Timing (in seconds)
% 8.01/2.94  ----------------------
% 8.01/2.95  Preprocessing        : 0.76
% 8.01/2.95  Parsing              : 0.30
% 8.01/2.95  CNF conversion       : 0.09
% 8.01/2.95  Main loop            : 1.14
% 8.01/2.95  Inferencing          : 0.16
% 8.01/2.95  Reduction            : 0.43
% 8.01/2.95  Demodulation         : 0.28
% 8.01/2.95  BG Simplification    : 0.12
% 8.01/2.95  Subsumption          : 0.34
% 8.01/2.95  Abstraction          : 0.03
% 8.01/2.95  MUC search           : 0.00
% 8.01/2.95  Cooper               : 0.00
% 8.01/2.95  Total                : 1.92
% 8.01/2.95  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 8.01/2.95  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 8.01/2.95  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 8.01/2.95  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------