TSTP Solution File: NLP193-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : NLP193-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 02:55:04 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.01s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP27727/NLP/NLP193-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 961] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 2167] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 4760] [nf = 12] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 10706] [nf = 24] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 19364] [nf = 36] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 28022] [nf = 48] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 36680] [nf = 60] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 45338] [nf = 72] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 53996] [nf = 84] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 62654] [nf = 96] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 71312] [nf = 108] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 79970] [nf = 120] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 88628] [nf = 132] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 97286] [nf = 144] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 105944] [nf = 156] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 114602] [nf = 168] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 123260] [nf = 180] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 131918] [nf = 192] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 140576] [nf = 204] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 149234] [nf = 216] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 157892] [nf = 228] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 166550] [nf = 240] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 175208] [nf = 252] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 183866] [nf = 264] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 192524] [nf = 276] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 201182] [nf = 288] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 209840] [nf = 300] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 218498] [nf = 312] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 227156] [nf = 324] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 235814] [nf = 336] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 236775] [nf = 336] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 237981] [nf = 336] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 240663] [nf = 372] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 246962] [nf = 420] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 261698] [nf = 1006] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 315804] [nf = 15121] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 578712] [nf = 81034] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 12 secs [nr = 1581950] [nf = 309886] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 42 secs [nr = 6382191] [nf = 2199597] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t =
% 193 secs [nr = 30721034] [nf = 10514150] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 68757559
% resolvents: 49271784 factors: 19485775
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 59220 [3] = 1119034 [4] = 8940141 [5] = 32879276 [6] = 22162009 [7] = 3583291
% [8] = 13374 [9] = 1214
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] actual_world_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [2] barrel_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] black_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] cheap_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] chevy_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] city_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] coat_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] dirty_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] event_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] fellow_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] forename_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] frontseat_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] group_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] hollywood_placename_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] jules_forename_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] lonely_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] man_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] nonreflexive_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] old_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] placename_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] present_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] ssSkP0_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] state_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] street_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] two_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] wear_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] wheel_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] white_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] young_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] agent_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] behind_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] down_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] in_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] member_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [35] of_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [36] patient_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [37] ssSkP1_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [38] ssSkP2_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [39] be_4 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 631303026
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 2219422037
% Number of successful unifications: 68757559
% Number of unification failures: 9115348
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 892147244
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1259975168
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 25
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 1
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 2
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.50
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 108
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 77872907
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 229192
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------