TSTP Solution File: NLP165-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : NLP165-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 02:45:59 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.06s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP14313/NLP/NLP165-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............................................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 576] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1355] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3213] [nf = 12] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7696] [nf = 24] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 14331] [nf = 36] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 20966] [nf = 48] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27601] [nf = 60] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 34236] [nf = 72] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 40871] [nf = 84] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 47506] [nf = 96] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 54141] [nf = 108] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 60776] [nf = 120] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 67411] [nf = 132] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 74046] [nf = 144] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 80681] [nf = 156] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 87316] [nf = 168] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 93951] [nf = 180] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 100586] [nf = 192] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 107221] [nf = 204] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 113856] [nf = 216] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 120491] [nf = 228] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 127126] [nf = 240] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 133761] [nf = 252] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 140396] [nf = 264] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 147031] [nf = 276] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 153694] [nf = 300] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 160357] [nf = 324] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 167048] [nf = 360] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 173739] [nf = 396] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 180430] [nf = 432] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 181006] [nf = 432] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 181785] [nf = 432] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 183730] [nf = 468] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 188564] [nf = 516] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 200469] [nf = 1098] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 245226] [nf = 12913] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 454119] [nf = 67670] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 1273641] [nf = 264237] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 26 secs [nr = 5123606] [nf = 1814387] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 115 secs [nr = 2379
% 9448] [nf = 8752842] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 89547617
% resolvents: 63671935 factors: 25875682
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 39284 [3] = 939439 [4] = 8786414 [5] = 37334734 [6] = 35666820 [7] = 6753785
% [8] = 25779 [9] = 1042 [25] = 120 [26] = 80 [27] = 72 [28] = 48
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] actual_world_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [2] barrel_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] black_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] cheap_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] chevy_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] city_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] coat_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] dirty_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] event_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] fellow_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] frontseat_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] group_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] hollywood_placename_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] lonely_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] nonreflexive_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] old_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] placename_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] present_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] ssSkP0_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] state_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] street_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] two_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] wear_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] white_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] young_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] agent_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] down_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [28] in_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] member_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] of_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [31] patient_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] ssSkP1_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [33] ssSkP2_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [34] be_4 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 790616129
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 2215873034
% Number of successful unifications: 89547617
% Number of unification failures: 12976714
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1042598328
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1295886864
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 27
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 1
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 2
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.50
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 97
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 102524331
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 298492
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------