TSTP Solution File: NLP159+1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : NLP159+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:50:28 EDT 2023
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 5.93s 2.38s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13 % Problem : NLP159+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 12:26:21 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 5.93/2.37
% 5.93/2.38 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.93/2.38
% 5.93/2.38 Inference rules
% 5.93/2.38 ----------------------
% 5.93/2.38 #Ref : 0
% 5.93/2.38 #Sup : 101
% 5.93/2.38 #Fact : 0
% 5.93/2.38 #Define : 0
% 5.93/2.38 #Split : 1
% 5.93/2.38 #Chain : 0
% 5.93/2.38 #Close : 0
% 5.93/2.38
% 5.93/2.38 Ordering : KBO
% 5.93/2.38
% 5.93/2.38 Simplification rules
% 5.93/2.38 ----------------------
% 5.93/2.38 #Subsume : 9
% 5.93/2.38 #Demod : 4
% 5.93/2.38 #Tautology : 5
% 5.93/2.38 #SimpNegUnit : 0
% 5.93/2.38 #BackRed : 0
% 5.93/2.38
% 5.93/2.38 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 5.93/2.38 #Strategies tried : 1
% 5.93/2.38
% 5.93/2.38 Timing (in seconds)
% 5.93/2.38 ----------------------
% 5.93/2.38 Preprocessing : 0.71
% 5.93/2.38 Parsing : 0.38
% 5.93/2.38 CNF conversion : 0.06
% 5.93/2.38 Main loop : 0.62
% 5.93/2.38 Inferencing : 0.26
% 5.93/2.38 Reduction : 0.16
% 5.93/2.38 Demodulation : 0.10
% 5.93/2.38 BG Simplification : 0.04
% 5.93/2.38 Subsumption : 0.12
% 5.93/2.38 Abstraction : 0.02
% 5.93/2.38 MUC search : 0.00
% 5.93/2.38 Cooper : 0.00
% 5.93/2.38 Total : 1.34
% 5.93/2.38 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 5.93/2.38 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 5.93/2.38 Index Matching : 0.00
% 5.93/2.38 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------