TSTP Solution File: NLP143-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : NLP143-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:44:43 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 15
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 45 ( 17 unt; 0 nHn; 36 RR)
% Number of literals : 73 ( 3 equ; 32 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 15 ( 13 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 64 ( 16 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause60,axiom,
( member(X1,skf10(X2,X1),X2)
| ~ two(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p8irny2g9l/E---3.1_29054.p',clause60) ).
cnf(clause73,negated_conjecture,
two(skc6,skc7),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p8irny2g9l/E---3.1_29054.p',clause73) ).
cnf(clause89,negated_conjecture,
( frontseat(skc6,skf5(X2))
| ~ member(skc6,X1,skc7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p8irny2g9l/E---3.1_29054.p',clause89) ).
cnf(clause48,axiom,
( seat(X1,X2)
| ~ frontseat(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p8irny2g9l/E---3.1_29054.p',clause48) ).
cnf(clause49,axiom,
( furniture(X1,X2)
| ~ seat(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p8irny2g9l/E---3.1_29054.p',clause49) ).
cnf(clause50,axiom,
( instrumentality(X1,X2)
| ~ furniture(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p8irny2g9l/E---3.1_29054.p',clause50) ).
cnf(clause30,axiom,
( artifact(X1,X2)
| ~ instrumentality(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p8irny2g9l/E---3.1_29054.p',clause30) ).
cnf(clause31,axiom,
( object(X1,X2)
| ~ artifact(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p8irny2g9l/E---3.1_29054.p',clause31) ).
cnf(clause35,axiom,
( unisex(X1,X2)
| ~ object(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p8irny2g9l/E---3.1_29054.p',clause35) ).
cnf(clause92,negated_conjecture,
( be(skc6,skf6(X1),X1,skf5(X1))
| ~ member(skc6,X1,skc7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p8irny2g9l/E---3.1_29054.p',clause92) ).
cnf(clause88,negated_conjecture,
( fellow(skc6,X1)
| ~ member(skc6,X1,skc7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p8irny2g9l/E---3.1_29054.p',clause88) ).
cnf(clause52,axiom,
( ~ male(X1,X2)
| ~ unisex(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p8irny2g9l/E---3.1_29054.p',clause52) ).
cnf(clause59,axiom,
( X3 = X4
| ~ be(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p8irny2g9l/E---3.1_29054.p',clause59) ).
cnf(clause2,axiom,
( man(X1,X2)
| ~ fellow(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p8irny2g9l/E---3.1_29054.p',clause2) ).
cnf(clause14,axiom,
( male(X1,X2)
| ~ man(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p8irny2g9l/E---3.1_29054.p',clause14) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
( member(X1,skf10(X2,X1),X2)
| ~ two(X1,X2) ),
clause60 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
two(skc6,skc7),
clause73 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
( frontseat(skc6,skf5(X2))
| ~ member(skc6,X1,skc7) ),
clause89 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
member(skc6,skf10(skc7,skc6),skc7),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
( seat(X1,X2)
| ~ frontseat(X1,X2) ),
clause48 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
frontseat(skc6,skf5(X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
( furniture(X1,X2)
| ~ seat(X1,X2) ),
clause49 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
seat(skc6,skf5(X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
( instrumentality(X1,X2)
| ~ furniture(X1,X2) ),
clause50 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
furniture(skc6,skf5(X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
( artifact(X1,X2)
| ~ instrumentality(X1,X2) ),
clause30 ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
instrumentality(skc6,skf5(X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
( object(X1,X2)
| ~ artifact(X1,X2) ),
clause31 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
artifact(skc6,skf5(X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,axiom,
( unisex(X1,X2)
| ~ object(X1,X2) ),
clause35 ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
object(skc6,skf5(X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
( be(skc6,skf6(X1),X1,skf5(X1))
| ~ member(skc6,X1,skc7) ),
clause92 ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
( fellow(skc6,X1)
| ~ member(skc6,X1,skc7) ),
clause88 ).
cnf(c_0_33,axiom,
( ~ male(X1,X2)
| ~ unisex(X1,X2) ),
clause52 ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
unisex(skc6,skf5(X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,axiom,
( X3 = X4
| ~ be(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
clause59 ).
cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
be(skc6,skf6(skf10(skc7,skc6)),skf10(skc7,skc6),skf5(skf10(skc7,skc6))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,axiom,
( man(X1,X2)
| ~ fellow(X1,X2) ),
clause2 ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
fellow(skc6,skf10(skc7,skc6)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
~ male(skc6,skf5(X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
skf5(skf10(skc7,skc6)) = skf10(skc7,skc6),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,axiom,
( male(X1,X2)
| ~ man(X1,X2) ),
clause14 ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
man(skc6,skf10(skc7,skc6)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
~ male(skc6,skf10(skc7,skc6)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]),c_0_43]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : NLP143-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 11:11:36 EDT 2023
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.45 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.p8irny2g9l/E---3.1_29054.p
% 0.17/0.47 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.17/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 29131 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.17/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.47 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S2g with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_107_C48_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S4d with 136s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with pid 29136 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA
% 0.17/0.47 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.47 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.17/0.47 # Search class: FGHSF-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.47 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.17/0.47 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SA with 811s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.17/0.47 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/0.47
% 0.17/0.47 # Proof found!
% 0.17/0.47 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.47 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.47 # Parsed axioms : 92
% 0.17/0.47 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Initial clauses : 92
% 0.17/0.47 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Initial clauses in saturation : 92
% 0.17/0.47 # Processed clauses : 285
% 0.17/0.47 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.17/0.47 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # ...remaining for further processing : 284
% 0.17/0.47 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.17/0.47 # Generated clauses : 129
% 0.17/0.47 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 123
% 0.17/0.47 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Paramodulations : 129
% 0.17/0.47 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Total rewrite steps : 13
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 # Current number of processed clauses : 188
% 0.17/0.47 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 95
% 0.17/0.47 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Negative unit clauses : 23
% 0.17/0.47 # Non-unit-clauses : 70
% 0.17/0.47 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19
% 0.17/0.47 # ...number of literals in the above : 19
% 0.17/0.47 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Current number of archived clauses : 96
% 0.17/0.47 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3131
% 0.17/0.47 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2104
% 0.17/0.47 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 225
% 0.17/0.47 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.17/0.47 # BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.17/0.47 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.47 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3122
% 0.17/0.47
% 0.17/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.47 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.17/0.47 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.47 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.17/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1776 pages
% 0.17/0.47
% 0.17/0.47 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.47 # User time : 0.037 s
% 0.17/0.47 # System time : 0.020 s
% 0.17/0.47 # Total time : 0.057 s
% 0.17/0.47 # Maximum resident set size: 1740 pages
% 0.17/0.47 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------