TSTP Solution File: NLP137-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : NLP137-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 02:40:27 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP9007/NLP/NLP137-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................................................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 361] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 822] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1591] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2844] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4401] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5958] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7515] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9072] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10629] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12186] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13743] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15300] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16857] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18414] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19971] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 21528] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 23085] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24642] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 26199] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27756] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 29317] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 30882] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 32447] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 34012] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 35577] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 37142] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 38707] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 40272] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 41837] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43402] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43763] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 44224] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 45015] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 46393] [nf = 11] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 48986] [nf = 67] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 55535] [nf = 635] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 73849] [nf = 2398] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 119917] [nf = 8561] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 234614] [nf = 27525] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 639488] [nf = 100180] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 2143383] [nf = 36818
% 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 36 secs [nr = 8457707] [nf = 1713345] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 169 secs [nr = 38215252] [nf = 8949802] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 83345365
% resolvents: 67049717 factors: 16295648
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 15523 [3] = 354843 [4] = 2969465 [5] = 11052943 [6] = 32798329 [7] = 25808579
% [8] = 8980008 [9] = 1319623 [10] = 45160 [11] = 816 [21] = 40 [22] = 36
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] actual_world_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [2] barrel_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] chevy_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] city_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] dirty_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] event_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] fellow_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] frontseat_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] group_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hollywood_placename_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] lonely_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] old_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] placename_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] present_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ssSkP0_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] ssSkP1_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] state_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] street_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] two_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] white_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] young_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] agent_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] down_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] in_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] member_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] of_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] be_4 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 638978321
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 2262122150
% Number of successful unifications: 83345365
% Number of unification failures: 32180318
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1091818258
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1504720889
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 26
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 1
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 2
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.50
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 83
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 115525683
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 277818
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------