TSTP Solution File: NLP134-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : NLP134-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 02:38:23 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP12359/NLP/NLP134-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ...................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 361] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 818] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1657] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2890] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4435] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5980] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 7525] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9070] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10615] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12160] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 13705] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15250] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 16795] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18340] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19885] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 21430] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 22975] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24520] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 26065] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27610] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 29159] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30712] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 32265] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 33818] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 35371] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 36924] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 38477] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 40030] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 41583] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43136] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43497] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 43954] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 44797] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 46138] [nf = 8] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 48719] [nf = 48] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 55252] [nf = 696] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 69609] [nf = 1820] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 96380] [nf = 2979] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 141468] [nf = 5523] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 320505] [nf = 19008] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 915970] [nf = 92732] [nu = 0]
% [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 14 secs [nr = 2849367] [nf = 421552] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 66 secs [nr = 15227100] [nf = 3041732] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 85770111
% resolvents: 68508572 factors: 17261539
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 15884 [3] = 380322 [4] = 3359789 [5] = 10649065 [6] = 27830186 [7] = 30289738
% [8] = 11657504 [9] = 1508181 [10] = 72457 [11] = 6909 [21] = 40 [22] = 36
% Average size of a generated clause: 7.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] actual_world_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [2] barrel_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] chevy_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] city_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] dirty_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] event_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] fellow_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] frontseat_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] group_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] hollywood_placename_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] lonely_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] old_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] placename_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] present_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [15] ssSkP0_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] state_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [17] street_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [18] two_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [19] white_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [20] young_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [21] agent_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [22] down_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [23] in_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] member_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] of_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] be_4 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 555801429
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 2718495546
% Number of successful unifications: 85770111
% Number of unification failures: 12567323
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 919602398
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 1605338774
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 26
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 1
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 2
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.50
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 78
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 98337434
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 285900
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------