TSTP Solution File: NLP122-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : NLP122-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 05:23:53 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.85s 1.07s
% Output   : Refutation 0.85s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : NLP122-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.11  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.10/0.32  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.10/0.32  % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 20:51:38 EDT 2022
% 0.10/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.34  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.10/0.34  The process was started by sandbox on n007.cluster.edu,
% 0.10/0.34  Thu Jun 30 20:51:38 2022
% 0.10/0.34  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 8488.
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.10/0.34  set(auto).
% 0.10/0.34     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.10/0.34     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.10/0.34     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.10/0.34     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.10/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.10/0.34     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.10/0.34     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.10/0.34     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.10/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.10/0.34     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.10/0.34     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.10/0.34     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.10/0.34     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.10/0.34  clear(print_given).
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  list(usable).
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=18.
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.10/0.34  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.10/0.34  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.10/0.34     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.10/0.34     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  ------------> process usable:
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  ------------> process sos:
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.36  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.36  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.36  number of clauses in intial UL: 18
% 0.18/0.36  number of clauses initially in problem: 36
% 0.18/0.36  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 50
% 0.18/0.36  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 82
% 0.18/0.36  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.36  absolute distinct symbol count: 28
% 0.18/0.36     distinct predicate count: 17
% 0.18/0.36     distinct function count: 0
% 0.18/0.36     distinct constant count: 11
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  
% 0.18/0.36  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.85/1.07  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.85/1.07  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Model 6 [ 1 1 263 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Model 7 [ 1 0 247 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Model 8 [ 1 1 251 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Model 9 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Model 10 [ 2 0 253 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Model 11 [ 2 1 255 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Model 12 [ 2 1 252 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Model 13 [ 2 0 261 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Model 14 [ 1 1 483 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.71 sec ----> 54 [hyper,41,18,44,45,46,47,48,39,40,42,43,38,53,52,51,50,49,20,37] {-} $F.
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Length of proof is 17.  Level of proof is 2.
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.85/1.07  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.85/1.07  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  1 [] {+} -ssSkC0|event(skc10,skc11).
% 0.85/1.07  2 [] {+} -ssSkC0|present(skc10,skc11).
% 0.85/1.07  3 [] {+} -ssSkC0|barrel(skc10,skc11).
% 0.85/1.07  4 [] {+} -ssSkC0|lonely(skc10,skc14).
% 0.85/1.07  5 [] {+} -ssSkC0|street(skc10,skc14).
% 0.85/1.07  6 [] {+} -ssSkC0|old(skc10,skc12).
% 0.85/1.07  7 [] {+} -ssSkC0|dirty(skc10,skc12).
% 0.85/1.07  8 [] {+} -ssSkC0|white(skc10,skc12).
% 0.85/1.07  9 [] {+} -ssSkC0|chevy(skc10,skc12).
% 0.85/1.07  10 [] {+} -ssSkC0|city(skc10,skc12).
% 0.85/1.07  11 [] {+} -ssSkC0|hollywood_placename(skc10,skc13).
% 0.85/1.07  12 [] {+} -ssSkC0|placename(skc10,skc13).
% 0.85/1.07  13 [] {+} -ssSkC0|down(skc10,skc11,skc14).
% 0.85/1.07  14 [] {+} -ssSkC0|in(skc10,skc11,skc12).
% 0.85/1.07  15 [] {+} -ssSkC0|agent(skc10,skc11,skc12).
% 0.85/1.07  16 [] {+} -ssSkC0|of(skc10,skc13,skc12).
% 0.85/1.07  17 [] {+} -event(A,B)| -present(A,B)| -barrel(A,B)| -down(A,B,C)| -lonely(A,C)| -street(A,C)| -in(A,B,D)| -agent(A,B,D)| -old(A,D)| -dirty(A,D)| -white(A,D)| -chevy(A,D)| -city(A,D)| -of(A,E,D)| -hollywood_placename(A,E)| -placename(A,E)| -actual_world(A)|ssSkC0.
% 0.85/1.07  18 [] {+} -city(A,B)| -chevy(A,B)| -white(A,B)| -dirty(A,B)| -old(A,B)| -agent(A,C,B)| -in(A,C,B)| -placename(A,D)| -hollywood_placename(A,D)| -of(A,D,B)| -event(A,C)| -present(A,C)| -barrel(A,C)| -down(A,C,E)| -lonely(A,E)| -street(A,E)| -actual_world(A)| -ssSkC0.
% 0.85/1.07  19 [] {+} actual_world(skc15).
% 0.85/1.07  20 [] {+} actual_world(skc10).
% 0.85/1.07  21 [] {+} ssSkC0|city(skc15,skc18).
% 0.85/1.07  22 [] {+} ssSkC0|chevy(skc15,skc18).
% 0.85/1.07  23 [] {+} ssSkC0|white(skc15,skc18).
% 0.85/1.07  24 [] {+} ssSkC0|dirty(skc15,skc18).
% 0.85/1.07  25 [] {+} ssSkC0|old(skc15,skc18).
% 0.85/1.07  26 [] {+} ssSkC0|placename(skc15,skc19).
% 0.85/1.07  27 [] {+} ssSkC0|hollywood_placename(skc15,skc19).
% 0.85/1.07  28 [] {+} ssSkC0|event(skc15,skc16).
% 0.85/1.07  29 [] {+} ssSkC0|present(skc15,skc16).
% 0.85/1.07  30 [] {+} ssSkC0|barrel(skc15,skc16).
% 0.85/1.07  31 [] {+} ssSkC0|lonely(skc15,skc17).
% 0.85/1.07  32 [] {+} ssSkC0|street(skc15,skc17).
% 0.85/1.07  33 [] {+} ssSkC0|agent(skc15,skc16,skc18).
% 0.85/1.07  34 [] {-} ssSkC0|in(skc15,skc16,skc18).
% 0.85/1.07  35 [] {+} ssSkC0|of(skc15,skc19,skc18).
% 0.85/1.07  36 [] {-} ssSkC0|down(skc15,skc16,skc17).
% 0.85/1.07  37 [hyper,35,17,28,29,30,36,31,32,34,33,25,24,23,22,21,27,26,19,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} ssSkC0.
% 0.85/1.07  38 [hyper,37,16] {+} of(skc10,skc13,skc12).
% 0.85/1.07  39 [hyper,37,15] {+} agent(skc10,skc11,skc12).
% 0.85/1.07  40 [hyper,37,14] {+} in(skc10,skc11,skc12).
% 0.85/1.07  41 [hyper,37,13] {+} down(skc10,skc11,skc14).
% 0.85/1.07  42 [hyper,37,12] {+} placename(skc10,skc13).
% 0.85/1.07  43 [hyper,37,11] {+} hollywood_placename(skc10,skc13).
% 0.85/1.07  44 [hyper,37,10] {+} city(skc10,skc12).
% 0.85/1.07  45 [hyper,37,9] {+} chevy(skc10,skc12).
% 0.85/1.07  46 [hyper,37,8] {+} white(skc10,skc12).
% 0.85/1.07  47 [hyper,37,7] {+} dirty(skc10,skc12).
% 0.85/1.07  48 [hyper,37,6] {+} old(skc10,skc12).
% 0.85/1.07  49 [hyper,37,5] {+} street(skc10,skc14).
% 0.85/1.07  50 [hyper,37,4] {+} lonely(skc10,skc14).
% 0.85/1.07  51 [hyper,37,3] {+} barrel(skc10,skc11).
% 0.85/1.07  52 [hyper,37,2] {+} present(skc10,skc11).
% 0.85/1.07  53 [hyper,37,1] {+} event(skc10,skc11).
% 0.85/1.07  54 [hyper,41,18,44,45,46,47,48,39,40,42,43,38,53,52,51,50,49,20,37] {-} $F.
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.85/1.07  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  ============ end of search ============
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  true clauses given          20      (57.1%)
% 0.85/1.07  false clauses given         15
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.85/1.07  tot:  0         0      (-nan% true)
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Model 14 [ 1 1 483 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.85/1.07  
% 0.85/1.07  Process 8488 finished Thu Jun 30 20:51:39 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------