TSTP Solution File: NLP120-1 by E---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1
% Problem : NLP120-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 18:42:20 EDT 2023
% Result : Satisfiable 0.19s 0.49s
% Output : Saturation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named clause1)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
actual_world(skc17),
clause1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
ssSkC0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_68]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
( ~ down(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ of(X1,X4,X5)
| ~ in(X1,X2,X5)
| ~ agent(X1,X2,X5)
| ~ street(X1,X3)
| ~ lonely(X1,X3)
| ~ barrel(X1,X2)
| ~ present(X1,X2)
| ~ event(X1,X2)
| ~ hollywood_placename(X1,X4)
| ~ placename(X1,X4)
| ~ old(X1,X5)
| ~ dirty(X1,X5)
| ~ white(X1,X5)
| ~ chevy(X1,X5)
| ~ city(X1,X5)
| ~ actual_world(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_78,negated_conjecture,
down(skc11,skc12,skc16),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_70])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_79,negated_conjecture,
street(skc11,skc16),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_72,c_0_70])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
lonely(skc11,skc16),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_70])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_81,negated_conjecture,
barrel(skc11,skc12),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_70])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_82,negated_conjecture,
present(skc11,skc12),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_75,c_0_70])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
event(skc11,skc12),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_70])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_84,negated_conjecture,
actual_world(skc11),
clause2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_87,negated_conjecture,
( ~ of(skc11,X1,X2)
| ~ in(skc11,skc12,X2)
| ~ agent(skc11,skc12,X2)
| ~ hollywood_placename(skc11,X1)
| ~ placename(skc11,X1)
| ~ old(skc11,X2)
| ~ dirty(skc11,X2)
| ~ white(skc11,X2)
| ~ chevy(skc11,X2)
| ~ city(skc11,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_78]),c_0_79]),c_0_80]),c_0_81]),c_0_82]),c_0_83]),c_0_84])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_88,negated_conjecture,
in(skc11,skc12,skc15),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_70])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_89,negated_conjecture,
city(skc11,skc15),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_86,c_0_70])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_98,negated_conjecture,
( ~ of(skc11,X1,skc15)
| ~ agent(skc11,skc12,skc15)
| ~ hollywood_placename(skc11,X1)
| ~ placename(skc11,X1)
| ~ old(skc11,skc15)
| ~ dirty(skc11,skc15)
| ~ white(skc11,skc15)
| ~ chevy(skc11,skc15) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_88]),c_0_89])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_99,negated_conjecture,
agent(skc11,skc12,skc13),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_70])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_100,negated_conjecture,
of(skc11,skc14,skc15),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_70])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_101,negated_conjecture,
chevy(skc11,skc13),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_92,c_0_70])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_102,negated_conjecture,
white(skc11,skc13),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_70])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_103,negated_conjecture,
dirty(skc11,skc13),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_94,c_0_70])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_104,negated_conjecture,
old(skc11,skc13),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_70])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_105,negated_conjecture,
placename(skc11,skc14),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_96,c_0_70])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_106,negated_conjecture,
hollywood_placename(skc11,skc14),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_97,c_0_70])]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : NLP120-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 11:43:58 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.aIt0W1KuhX/E---3.1_1302.p
% 0.19/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 1441 completed with status 1
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting H----_011_C07_F1_PI_AE_OS_S1U with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G----_425_C05_02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_RG_S04AI with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_B07--C_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_200_B02_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S2k with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # H----_011_C07_F1_PI_AE_OS_S1U with pid 1446 completed with status 1
% 0.19/0.49 # Result found by H----_011_C07_F1_PI_AE_OS_S1U
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.19/0.49 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/0.49 # Starting H----_011_C07_F1_PI_AE_OS_S1U with 811s (1) cores
% 0.19/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # No proof found!
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.19/0.49 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 36
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses : 36
% 0.19/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 36
% 0.19/0.49 # Processed clauses : 71
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 71
% 0.19/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 13
% 0.19/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 36
% 0.19/0.49 # Generated clauses : 19
% 0.19/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 36
% 0.19/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Paramodulations : 19
% 0.19/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 45
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 22
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 19
% 0.19/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.19/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 49
% 0.19/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 110
% 0.19/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 85
% 0.19/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13
% 0.19/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.19/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.19/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2032
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.19/0.49
% 0.19/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49 # User time : 0.019 s
% 0.19/0.49 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Total time : 0.027 s
% 0.19/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1708 pages
% 0.19/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.19/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------