TSTP Solution File: NLP113-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : NLP113-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Mon Jul 18 02:12:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Satisfiable 0.12s 0.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : NLP113-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Jun 30 21:27:52 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.12/0.37 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.12/0.37 #
% 0.12/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.37 # Number of axioms: 50 Number of unprocessed: 50
% 0.12/0.37 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.37 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.37 # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.37 # 50 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 16 conjectures.
% 0.12/0.37 # There are 16 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.37 # Found 2 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.12/0.37 # 16 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.37 # 48 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.37 # 2 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.37
% 0.12/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.38 # 19672 Satisfiable branch
% 0.12/0.38 # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.12/0.38 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.38 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.38 # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38 # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.38 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_85, negated_conjecture, (actual_world(skc2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_86, negated_conjecture, (restaurant(skc2,skc3))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_90, negated_conjecture, (see(skc2,skf4(X1))|~in(skc2,X2,skc3)|~customer(skc2,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_87, negated_conjecture, (event(skc2,skf4(X1))|~in(skc2,X2,skc3)|~customer(skc2,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_95, negated_conjecture, (event(skc2,skf5(X1))|~in(skc2,X2,skc3)|~customer(skc2,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_51, plain, (event(X1,X2)|~see(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_58, plain, (event(X1,X2)|~drink(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_81, plain, (~existent(X1,X2)|~nonexistent(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_80, plain, (~living(X1,X2)|~nonliving(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_82, plain, (~animate(X1,X2)|~nonliving(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_59, plain, (beverage(X1,X2)|~coffee(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_76, plain, (human_person(X1,X2)|~customer(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_92, negated_conjecture, (drink(skc2,skf5(X1))|~in(skc2,X2,skc3)|~customer(skc2,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_91, negated_conjecture, (coffee(skc2,skf6(X1))|~in(skc2,X2,skc3)|~customer(skc2,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_96, negated_conjecture, (human_person(skc2,skf7(X1))|~in(skc2,X2,skc3)|~customer(skc2,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_89, negated_conjecture, (nonreflexive(skc2,skf4(X1))|~in(skc2,X2,skc3)|~customer(skc2,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_52, plain, (eventuality(X1,X2)|~event(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_70, plain, (organism(X1,X2)|~human_person(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_62, plain, (object(X1,X2)|~substance_matter(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_79, plain, (object(X1,X2)|~artifact(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_71, plain, (entity(X1,X2)|~organism(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_78, plain, (artifact(X1,X2)|~building(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_74, plain, (human(X1,X2)|~human_person(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_93, negated_conjecture, (nonreflexive(skc2,skf5(X1))|~in(skc2,X2,skc3)|~customer(skc2,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_88, negated_conjecture, (past(skc2,skf4(X1))|~in(skc2,X2,skc3)|~customer(skc2,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_94, negated_conjecture, (past(skc2,skf5(X1))|~in(skc2,X2,skc3)|~customer(skc2,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_97, negated_conjecture, (agent(skc2,skf4(X1),X1)|~in(skc2,X1,skc3)|~customer(skc2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_53, plain, (thing(X1,X2)|~eventuality(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_75, plain, (animate(X1,X2)|~human_person(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_64, plain, (thing(X1,X2)|~entity(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_54, plain, (singleton(X1,X2)|~thing(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_55, plain, (specific(X1,X2)|~eventuality(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_65, plain, (specific(X1,X2)|~entity(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_77, plain, (building(X1,X2)|~restaurant(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_100, negated_conjecture, (patient(skc2,skf4(X1),skf7(X1))|~in(skc2,X2,skc3)|~customer(skc2,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_98, negated_conjecture, (patient(skc2,skf5(X1),skf6(X1))|~in(skc2,X2,skc3)|~customer(skc2,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_99, negated_conjecture, (agent(skc2,skf5(X1),skf7(X1))|~in(skc2,X2,skc3)|~customer(skc2,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_56, plain, (nonexistent(X1,X2)|~eventuality(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_57, plain, (unisex(X1,X2)|~eventuality(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_69, plain, (unisex(X1,X2)|~object(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_60, plain, (food(X1,X2)|~beverage(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_61, plain, (substance_matter(X1,X2)|~food(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_63, plain, (entity(X1,X2)|~object(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_66, plain, (existent(X1,X2)|~entity(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_67, plain, (nonliving(X1,X2)|~object(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_68, plain, (impartial(X1,X2)|~object(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_72, plain, (impartial(X1,X2)|~organism(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_73, plain, (living(X1,X2)|~organism(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_83, plain, (~agent(X1,X2,X3)|~patient(X1,X2,X3)|~nonreflexive(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_84, plain, (beverage(X1,X2)|~agent(X1,X3,X4)|~patient(X1,X3,X2)|~drink(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.38 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.38 # Found 3 steps
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_86, negated_conjecture, (restaurant(skc2,skc3)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_143, plain, (restaurant(skc2,skc3)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_77])).
% 0.12/0.38 cnf(i_0_846, plain, (building(skc2,skc3)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_78])).
% 0.12/0.38 # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.38 # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.38 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.38 # Child (19672) has found a proof.
% 0.12/0.38
% 0.12/0.38 # Proof search is over...
% 0.12/0.38 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------