TSTP Solution File: NLP110-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : NLP110-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art01.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 02:30:58 EST 2010
% Result : GaveUp 0.67s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP28793/NLP/NLP110-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 40] [nf = 0] [nu = 20] [ut = 23]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 169] [nf = 0] [nu = 91] [ut = 43]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 484] [nf = 0] [nu = 266] [ut = 52]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1101] [nf = 0] [nu = 604] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2207] [nf = 0] [nu = 1208] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4061] [nf = 0] [nu = 2240] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6882] [nf = 0] [nu = 3868] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 10762] [nf = 0] [nu = 6158] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15698] [nf = 0] [nu = 9134] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 21345] [nf = 0] [nu = 12754] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 27131] [nf = 1] [nu = 16448] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 33008] [nf = 2] [nu = 20225] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 38885] [nf = 3] [nu = 24002] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 44762] [nf = 4] [nu = 27779] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 50639] [nf = 5] [nu = 31556] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 56516] [nf = 6] [nu = 35333] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 62393] [nf = 7] [nu = 39110] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 68270] [nf = 8] [nu = 42887] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 74147] [nf = 9] [nu = 46664] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 80024] [nf = 10] [nu = 50441] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 85901] [nf = 11] [nu = 54218] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 91778] [nf = 12] [nu = 57995] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 97655] [nf = 13] [nu = 61772] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 103532] [nf = 14] [nu = 65549] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 109409] [nf = 15] [nu = 69326] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 115286] [nf = 16] [nu = 73103] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 121163] [nf = 17] [nu = 76880] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 127040] [nf = 18] [nu = 80657] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 132917] [nf = 19] [nu = 84434] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 138794] [nf = 20] [nu = 88211] [ut = 53]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 138863] [nf = 20] [nu = 88260] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 139015] [nf = 20] [nu = 88354] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 139339] [nf = 20] [nu = 88536] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 139956] [nf = 20] [nu = 88874] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 141062] [nf = 20] [nu = 89478] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 142916] [nf = 20] [nu = 90510] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 145737] [nf = 20] [nu = 92138] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 149617] [nf = 20] [nu = 94428] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 154553] [nf = 20] [nu = 97404] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 160200] [nf = 20] [nu = 101024] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 165986] [nf = 21] [nu = 104718] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 171863] [nf = 22] [nu = 108495] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 177740] [nf = 23] [nu = 112272] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 183617] [nf = 24] [nu = 116049] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 189494] [nf = 25] [nu = 119826] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 195371] [nf = 26] [nu = 123603] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 201248] [nf = 27] [nu = 127380] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 207125] [nf = 28] [nu = 131157] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 213002] [nf = 29] [nu = 134934] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 218879] [nf = 30] [nu = 138711] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 224756] [nf = 31] [nu = 142488] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 230633] [nf = 32] [nu = 146265] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 236510] [nf = 33] [nu = 150042] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 242387] [nf = 34] [nu = 153819] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 248264] [nf = 35] [nu = 157596] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 254141] [nf = 36] [nu = 161373] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 260018] [nf = 37] [nu = 165150] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 265895] [nf = 38] [nu = 168927] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 271772] [nf = 39] [nu = 172704] [ut = 53]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 277649] [nf = 40] [nu = 176481] [ut = 53]
% GIVE UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 277689
% resolvents: 277649 factors: 40
% Number of unit clauses generated: 176481
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 63.55
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 9 [1] = 14 [2] = 20 [3] = 9
% [4] = 1
% Total = 53
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 176481 [2] = 98612 [3] = 2596
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] actual_world_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [1] animate_2 (+)1 (-)1
% [2] artifact_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] beverage_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [4] building_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] coffee_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [6] customer_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] drink_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [8] entity_2 (+)2 (-)1
% [9] event_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [10] eventuality_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [11] existent_2 (+)2 (-)1
% [12] food_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [13] human_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] human_person_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [15] impartial_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] living_2 (+)1 (-)1
% [17] nonexistent_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [18] nonliving_2 (+)1 (-)1
% [19] nonreflexive_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [20] object_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [21] organism_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [22] past_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [23] restaurant_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [24] see_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] singleton_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] specific_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] substance_matter_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [28] thing_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] unisex_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] agent_3 (+)1 (-)1
% [31] in_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] patient_3 (+)1 (-)2
% ------------------
% Total: (+)23 (-)30
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 53
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 4232
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 277689
% Number of unification failures: 22463
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 32
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 526840
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3140734
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 22
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 7466
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 84
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 110
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.76
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 72
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 300152
% ConstructUnitClause() = 7510
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.01 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: inf
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 1 secs
% CPU time: 0.67 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------