TSTP Solution File: NLP108-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : NLP108-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 02:30:45 EST 2010
% Result : GaveUp 1.11s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP12816/NLP/NLP108-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 47] [nf = 0] [nu = 23] [ut = 26]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 219] [nf = 0] [nu = 121] [ut = 58]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 664] [nf = 0] [nu = 378] [ut = 73]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1555] [nf = 0] [nu = 878] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3175] [nf = 0] [nu = 1788] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5879] [nf = 0] [nu = 3334] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9934] [nf = 0] [nu = 5732] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15432] [nf = 0] [nu = 9048] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 22242] [nf = 0] [nu = 13306] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 29763] [nf = 0] [nu = 18208] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 37423] [nf = 1] [nu = 23184] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 45174] [nf = 2] [nu = 28243] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 52925] [nf = 3] [nu = 33302] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 60676] [nf = 4] [nu = 38361] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 68427] [nf = 5] [nu = 43420] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 76178] [nf = 6] [nu = 48479] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 83929] [nf = 7] [nu = 53538] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 91680] [nf = 8] [nu = 58597] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 99431] [nf = 9] [nu = 63656] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 107182] [nf = 10] [nu = 68715] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 114933] [nf = 11] [nu = 73774] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 122684] [nf = 12] [nu = 78833] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 130435] [nf = 13] [nu = 83892] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 138186] [nf = 14] [nu = 88951] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 145937] [nf = 15] [nu = 94010] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 153688] [nf = 16] [nu = 99069] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 161439] [nf = 17] [nu = 104128] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 169190] [nf = 18] [nu = 109187] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 176941] [nf = 19] [nu = 114246] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 184692] [nf = 20] [nu = 119305] [ut = 74]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 184787] [nf = 20] [nu = 119376] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 184997] [nf = 20] [nu = 119512] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 185452] [nf = 20] [nu = 119776] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 186391] [nf = 20] [nu = 120294] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 188155] [nf = 20] [nu = 121264] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 191210] [nf = 20] [nu = 122946] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 196091] [nf = 20] [nu = 125660] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 203267] [nf = 20] [nu = 129688] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 212753] [nf = 20] [nu = 135204] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 223744] [nf = 20] [nu = 141844] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 235491] [nf = 30] [nu = 148864] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 247799] [nf = 40] [nu = 156357] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 260107] [nf = 50] [nu = 163850] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 272415] [nf = 60] [nu = 171343] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 284723] [nf = 70] [nu = 178836] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 297031] [nf = 80] [nu = 186329] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 309339] [nf = 90] [nu = 193822] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 321647] [nf = 100] [nu = 201315] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 333955] [nf = 110] [nu = 208808] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 346263] [nf = 120] [nu = 216301] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 358571] [nf = 130] [nu = 223794] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 370879] [nf = 140] [nu = 231287] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 383187] [nf = 150] [nu = 238780] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 395495] [nf = 160] [nu = 246273] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 407803] [nf = 170] [nu = 253766] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 420111] [nf = 180] [nu = 261259] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 432419] [nf = 190] [nu = 268752] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 444727] [nf = 200] [nu = 276245] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 457035] [nf = 210] [nu = 283738] [ut = 74]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 469343] [nf = 220] [nu = 291231] [ut = 74]
% GIVE UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 469563
% resolvents: 469343 factors: 220
% Number of unit clauses generated: 291231
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 62.02
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 10 [1] = 16 [2] = 32 [3] = 15
% [4] = 1
% Total = 74
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 291231 [2] = 169614 [3] = 8361 [4] = 357
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] actual_world_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [1] animate_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [2] artifact_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [3] beverage_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [4] building_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [5] coffee_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [6] customer_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] drink_2 (+)1 (-)3
% [8] entity_2 (+)3 (-)1
% [9] event_2 (+)1 (-)3
% [10] eventuality_2 (+)1 (-)3
% [11] existent_2 (+)3 (-)1
% [12] food_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [13] human_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [14] human_person_2 (+)1 (-)3
% [15] impartial_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [16] living_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [17] nonexistent_2 (+)1 (-)3
% [18] nonliving_2 (+)2 (-)1
% [19] nonreflexive_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [20] object_2 (+)2 (-)2
% [21] organism_2 (+)1 (-)3
% [22] past_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [23] restaurant_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [24] see_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [25] singleton_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [26] specific_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [27] substance_matter_2 (+)1 (-)2
% [28] thing_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [29] unisex_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [30] agent_3 (+)1 (-)1
% [31] in_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [32] patient_3 (+)1 (-)2
% ------------------
% Total: (+)30 (-)44
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 74
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 8454
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 469563
% Number of unification failures: 55706
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 51
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 945942
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 6525673
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 22
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 12418
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 96
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 152
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.63
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 73
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 525269
% ConstructUnitClause() = 12482
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.02 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 469563
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 1 secs
% CPU time: 1.11 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------