TSTP Solution File: NLP100-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : NLP100-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 02:27:14 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11519/NLP/NLP100-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ...................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 42] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 54] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 66] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 78] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 90] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 102] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 114] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 130] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 146] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 162] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 178] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 216] [nf = 10] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 272] [nf = 28] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 328] [nf = 46] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 384] [nf = 64] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 440] [nf = 82] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 496] [nf = 100] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 552] [nf = 118] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 608] [nf = 136] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 664] [nf = 154] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 720] [nf = 172] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 776] [nf = 190] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 832] [nf = 208] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 888] [nf = 226] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 944] [nf = 244] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1000] [nf = 262] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1056] [nf = 280] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1062] [nf = 280] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1074] [nf = 280] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1086] [nf = 280] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1230] [nf = 286] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1470] [nf = 292] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 3054] [nf = 298] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5946] [nf = 766] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 15216] [nf = 4048] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 48516] [nf = 15790] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 261742] [nf = 103198] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1168902] [nf = 472552] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth =
% 12 ...
% t = 16 secs [nr = 6871664] [nf = 2395974] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 51 secs [nr = 21441074] [nf = 8915528] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 193 secs [nr = 95495964] [nf = 23919652] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 178547678
% resolvents: 144917913 factors: 33629765
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 524 [3] = 934938 [4] = 4839634 [5] = 6305464 [6] = 17833860 [7] = 58672528
% [8] = 53937059 [9] = 27500783 [10] = 7270446 [11] = 984062 [12] = 213820 [13] = 44514
% [14] = 8516 [15] = 1366 [16] = 164
% Average size of a generated clause: 8.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] actual_world_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [2] coffee_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] customer_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] drink_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] event_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] human_person_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] nonreflexive_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] past_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] restaurant_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] see_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] agent_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] in_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] patient_3 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 2225133588
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 988313461
% Number of successful unifications: 178547678
% Number of unification failures: 67338334
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 913912920
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 220539422
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 9
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 1
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 2
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.50
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 62
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 245886012
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 595159
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------