TSTP Solution File: NLP097-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : NLP097-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art11.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz @ 3000MHz
% Memory : 2006MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.31.5-127.fc12.i686.PAE
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 02:26:50 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.00s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP22275/NLP/NLP097-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ...................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 18] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 30] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 46] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 62] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 78] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 94] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 110] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 126] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 142] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 158] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 174] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 190] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 206] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 244] [nf = 10] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 304] [nf = 30] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 364] [nf = 50] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 424] [nf = 70] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 484] [nf = 90] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 544] [nf = 110] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 604] [nf = 130] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 664] [nf = 150] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 724] [nf = 170] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 784] [nf = 190] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 25 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 844] [nf = 210] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 26 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 904] [nf = 230] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 27 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 964] [nf = 250] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 28 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1024] [nf = 270] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 29 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1084] [nf = 290] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 30 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1144] [nf = 310] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Restarting search with different parameters.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1150] [nf = 310] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1162] [nf = 310] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1178] [nf = 310] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1259] [nf = 323] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1522] [nf = 352] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2544] [nf = 411] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5793] [nf = 1332] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 25415] [nf = 5555] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 88714] [nf = 33669] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 422334] [nf = 144768] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1905049] [nf = 846515] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth
% = 12 ...
% t = 27 secs [nr = 10557645] [nf = 3249987] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 110 secs [nr = 40638783] [nf = 17044695] [nu = 0] [ut = 2]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 160120712
% resolvents: 114682013 factors: 45438699
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 2
% Total = 2
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 514 [3] = 1078920 [4] = 9416035 [5] = 19118995 [6] = 23714309 [7] = 40595021
% [8] = 42848527 [9] = 18293451 [10] = 4536722 [11] = 512748 [12] = 4456 [14] = 340
% [15] = 494 [16] = 180
% Average size of a generated clause: 8.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] ssSkC0 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] actual_world_1 (+)2 (-)0
% [2] coffee_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] customer_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] drink_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [5] event_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [6] human_person_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [7] nonreflexive_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [8] past_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [9] restaurant_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [10] see_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [11] agent_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [12] in_3 (+)0 (-)0
% [13] patient_3 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)2 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 2
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 2425815263
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 183161388
% Number of successful unifications: 160120712
% Number of unification failures: 60212065
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1105183499
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 226688983
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 10
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 1
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 2
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 1.50
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 62
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 220332777
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 533736
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 302 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------